Center for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4687-4706. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16331. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
Notwithstanding the huge progress in molecular and cellular neuroscience, our ability to understand the brain and develop effective treatments promoting mental health is still limited. This can be partially ascribed to the reductionist, deterministic and mechanistic approaches in neuroscience that struggle with the complexity of the central nervous system. Here, I introduce the Context theory of constrained systems proposing a novel role of contextual factors and genetic, molecular and neural substrates in determining brain functioning and behavior. This theory entails key conceptual implications. First, context is the main driver of behavior and mental states. Second, substrates, from genes to brain areas, have no direct causal link to complex behavioral responses as they can be combined in multiple ways to produce the same response and different responses can impinge on the same substrates. Third, context and biological substrates play distinct roles in determining behavior: context drives behavior, substrates constrain the behavioral repertoire that can be implemented. Fourth, since behavior is the interface between the central nervous system and the environment, it is a privileged level of control and orchestration of brain functioning. Such implications are illustrated through the Kitchen metaphor of the brain. This theoretical framework calls for the revision of key concepts in neuroscience and psychiatry, including causality, specificity and individuality. Moreover, at the clinical level, it proposes treatments inducing behavioral changes through contextual interventions as having the highest impact to reorganize the complexity of the human mind and to achieve a long-lasting improvement in mental health.
尽管分子和细胞神经科学取得了巨大进展,但我们理解大脑和开发促进心理健康的有效治疗方法的能力仍然有限。这在一定程度上可以归因于神经科学中的还原论、决定论和机械论方法,它们难以应对中枢神经系统的复杂性。在这里,我介绍了约束系统的情境理论,提出了情境因素以及遗传、分子和神经基质在决定大脑功能和行为方面的新作用。这一理论包含了关键的概念性含义。首先,情境是行为和心理状态的主要驱动因素。其次,从基因到大脑区域的基质与复杂的行为反应没有直接的因果关系,因为它们可以以多种方式组合,产生相同的反应,不同的反应也可以影响相同的基质。第三,情境和生物基质在决定行为方面起着不同的作用:情境驱动行为,基质限制可以实施的行为范围。第四,由于行为是中枢神经系统与环境之间的接口,它是大脑功能控制和协调的一个特权层面。通过 Kitchen 隐喻来举例说明这一理论框架,它呼吁修订神经科学和精神病学中的关键概念,包括因果关系、特异性和个体性。此外,在临床层面上,它提出了通过情境干预来诱导行为改变的治疗方法,因为这些方法对重新组织人类思维的复杂性和实现心理健康的长期改善具有最高的影响。