• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示大脑功能、行为及其在背景下相互作用的决定因素。

Uncovering the determinants of brain functioning, behavior and their interplay in the light of context.

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4687-4706. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16331. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1111/ejn.16331
PMID:38558227
Abstract

Notwithstanding the huge progress in molecular and cellular neuroscience, our ability to understand the brain and develop effective treatments promoting mental health is still limited. This can be partially ascribed to the reductionist, deterministic and mechanistic approaches in neuroscience that struggle with the complexity of the central nervous system. Here, I introduce the Context theory of constrained systems proposing a novel role of contextual factors and genetic, molecular and neural substrates in determining brain functioning and behavior. This theory entails key conceptual implications. First, context is the main driver of behavior and mental states. Second, substrates, from genes to brain areas, have no direct causal link to complex behavioral responses as they can be combined in multiple ways to produce the same response and different responses can impinge on the same substrates. Third, context and biological substrates play distinct roles in determining behavior: context drives behavior, substrates constrain the behavioral repertoire that can be implemented. Fourth, since behavior is the interface between the central nervous system and the environment, it is a privileged level of control and orchestration of brain functioning. Such implications are illustrated through the Kitchen metaphor of the brain. This theoretical framework calls for the revision of key concepts in neuroscience and psychiatry, including causality, specificity and individuality. Moreover, at the clinical level, it proposes treatments inducing behavioral changes through contextual interventions as having the highest impact to reorganize the complexity of the human mind and to achieve a long-lasting improvement in mental health.

摘要

尽管分子和细胞神经科学取得了巨大进展,但我们理解大脑和开发促进心理健康的有效治疗方法的能力仍然有限。这在一定程度上可以归因于神经科学中的还原论、决定论和机械论方法,它们难以应对中枢神经系统的复杂性。在这里,我介绍了约束系统的情境理论,提出了情境因素以及遗传、分子和神经基质在决定大脑功能和行为方面的新作用。这一理论包含了关键的概念性含义。首先,情境是行为和心理状态的主要驱动因素。其次,从基因到大脑区域的基质与复杂的行为反应没有直接的因果关系,因为它们可以以多种方式组合,产生相同的反应,不同的反应也可以影响相同的基质。第三,情境和生物基质在决定行为方面起着不同的作用:情境驱动行为,基质限制可以实施的行为范围。第四,由于行为是中枢神经系统与环境之间的接口,它是大脑功能控制和协调的一个特权层面。通过 Kitchen 隐喻来举例说明这一理论框架,它呼吁修订神经科学和精神病学中的关键概念,包括因果关系、特异性和个体性。此外,在临床层面上,它提出了通过情境干预来诱导行为改变的治疗方法,因为这些方法对重新组织人类思维的复杂性和实现心理健康的长期改善具有最高的影响。

相似文献

1
Uncovering the determinants of brain functioning, behavior and their interplay in the light of context.揭示大脑功能、行为及其在背景下相互作用的决定因素。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Sep;60(5):4687-4706. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16331. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Recentering neuroscience on behavior: The interface between brain and environment is a privileged level of control of neural activity.将神经科学重新聚焦于行为:大脑与环境的相互作用是神经活动控制的一个特殊层次。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jul;138:104678. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104678. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
[Dynamic paradigm in psychopathology: "chaos theory", from physics to psychiatry].[精神病理学中的动态范式:“混沌理论”,从物理学到精神病学]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):260-8.
4
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
5
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias.神经科学需要行为学:纠正简化论偏见。
Neuron. 2017 Feb 8;93(3):480-490. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041.
6
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
7
Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: how overuse/misuse of the term 'cognition' and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind.从神经学角度反思认知革命:行为神经科学中过度使用/误用“认知”一词以及忽视情感控制如何可能会延迟对脑-心智理解的进展。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):2026-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
8
Sciences of the brain: The long road to scientific maturity and to present-day reductionism.脑科学:通往科学成熟及当代还原论的漫长道路。
C R Biol. 2015 Aug-Sep;338(8-9):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2015.06.014. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
9
Traces of culture: The feedback loop between behavior, brain, and disorder.文化的痕迹:行为、大脑和疾病之间的反馈回路。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;57(3):387-407. doi: 10.1177/1363461519879515. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Social neuroscience: undoing the schism between neurology and psychiatry.社会神经科学:消除神经病学与精神病学之间的分歧。
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Feb;13(1):1-39. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1245214. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Tacit Creationism Encourages Oversimplified Views of Functions and Dysfunctions.隐性神创论助长了对功能和功能障碍的过度简化观点。
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Mar;61(5):e70028. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70028.
2
A network-based analysis anticipates time to recovery from major depression revealing a plasticity by context interplay.基于网络的分析预测了重度抑郁症恢复所需的时间,揭示了一种由情境相互作用产生的可塑性。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03246-1.