Apithanung Lalitpat, Sethasathien Saviga, Silvilairat Suchaya, Sittiwangkul Rekwan, Makonkawkeyoon Krit, Saengsin Kwannapas, Woragidpoonpol Surin
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;40(6):1193-1200. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03086-y. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
The gold standard for assessing pressure gradients (PG) across coarctation involves measurements obtained through cardiac catheterization or surgical intervention. There has been ongoing discussion regarding the accuracy of non-invasive methods for estimating these gradients. This study sought to establish the correlation and agreement between the systolic blood pressure (SBP) gradient between the upper and lower extremities, as well as, the mean and maximum PG derived from echocardiography, in comparison to the peak-to-peak pressure gradient obtained from either cardiac catheterization or surgery. We conducted a retrospective study on patients < 18 years diagnosed with coarctation at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2011 to 2022. The study involved the measurement of the SBP gradient between the upper and lower extremities, mean and maximum PG using echocardiography, peak-to-peak pressure gradient obtained from cardiac catheterization, and pressure gradient recorded during surgical procedures. The Spearman's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess correlation and agreement. Fifty-four patients with aortic coarctation were enrolled. The mean PG measured by echocardiography showed a significantly moderate correlation (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and the highest level of agreement according to Bland Altman plots, in comparison to the peak-to-peak pressure gradient measured during both cardiac catheterization and surgical procedure. The max PG demonstrated a notable overestimation compared to the gold standard (mean difference + 13.14 with a slope of biases + 0.64, p < 0.001). The mean PG obtained through echocardiography has more potential to be applied in practical application in predicting pressure gradient in patients with coarctation.
评估主动脉缩窄处压力阶差(PG)的金标准是通过心导管检查或手术干预获得的测量值。关于估计这些压力阶差的非侵入性方法的准确性一直存在讨论。本研究旨在确定上肢和下肢之间收缩压(SBP)阶差与超声心动图得出的平均和最大PG之间的相关性和一致性,并与心导管检查或手术得出的峰-峰压力阶差进行比较。我们对2011年至2022年在清迈大学医院诊断为主动脉缩窄的18岁以下患者进行了一项回顾性研究。该研究包括测量上肢和下肢之间的SBP阶差、使用超声心动图测量的平均和最大PG、心导管检查得出的峰-峰压力阶差以及手术过程中记录的压力阶差。采用Spearman相关性分析和Bland-Altman分析来评估相关性和一致性。纳入了54例主动脉缩窄患者。与心导管检查和手术过程中测量的峰-峰压力阶差相比,超声心动图测量的平均PG显示出显著的中度相关性(r = 0.78,p < 0.001),并且根据Bland Altman图显示出最高水平的一致性。与金标准相比,最大PG显示出明显高估(平均差异 + 13.14,偏差斜率 + 0.64,p < 0.001)。通过超声心动图获得的平均PG在预测主动脉缩窄患者的压力阶差方面更有潜力应用于实际。