• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农民生活垃圾源头分类意愿与行为偏差:邻里效应及政策干预研究

The deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation: a study on neighborhood effects and policy interventions.

作者信息

Chen Xi, Xing Lirong, Li Bowei, Wang Chongcai, Zhang Yue

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.

School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 5;15:1358903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358903. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358903
PMID:38558778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10979936/
Abstract

Based on the perspective of combining informal and formal systems, this paper empirically explores the impact of neighborhood effects and policy interventions on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation (DWS) by using data from the China Land Economy Survey (CLES) and constructing a probit model. It should be explained that the neighborhood effect in this paper refers to the fact that the behavior of farmers is highly susceptible to the behavior of their neighbors in the process of production and living. The results of the study show that neighborhood effects and policy interventions have a significant negative impact on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, respectively. Comparison of marginal effects shows that neighborhood effects > environmental advocacy > reward and punishment policies. From the interaction effects as a whole, neighborhood effects and policy interventions have complementary effects on the deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that neighborhood effects completely replace the inhibitory effect of policy interventions on the deviation of high-income farmers' willingness and behavior of DWS, but have no effect on political elite farmers. The interaction between neighborhood effects and policy interventions has complementary effects on low-income farmers and ordinary farmers, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant.

摘要

基于非正式制度与正式制度相结合的视角,本文利用中国土地经济调查(CLES)的数据并构建Probit模型,实证探究邻里效应和政策干预对农民生活垃圾分离意愿与行为偏差的影响。需要说明的是,本文中的邻里效应是指农民在生产生活过程中,其行为极易受到邻居行为的影响。研究结果表明,邻里效应和政策干预分别对农民生活垃圾分离意愿与行为偏差有显著的负向影响。边际效应比较显示,邻里效应>环境宣传>奖惩政策。从整体交互效应来看,邻里效应和政策干预对农民生活垃圾分离意愿与行为偏差具有互补效应,其中邻里效应与环境宣传的互补效应更为显著。异质性分析表明,邻里效应完全替代了政策干预对高收入农民生活垃圾分离意愿与行为偏差的抑制作用,但对政治精英农民没有影响。邻里效应与政策干预的交互作用对低收入农民和普通农民具有互补效应,其中邻里效应与环境宣传的互补效应更为显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105e/10979936/3528e9dfbe70/fpsyg-15-1358903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105e/10979936/3528e9dfbe70/fpsyg-15-1358903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/105e/10979936/3528e9dfbe70/fpsyg-15-1358903-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The deviation of farmers' willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation: a study on neighborhood effects and policy interventions.农民生活垃圾源头分类意愿与行为偏差:邻里效应及政策干预研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 5;15:1358903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358903. eCollection 2024.
2
Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers' Green Production in Hainan, China.意愿与行为之间的差距:理解中国海南农民绿色生产的一致性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811351.
3
Influencing factors of farmers' participation in domestic waste classification: An empirical analysis based on the semi-nonparametric estimation extended model.农民参与生活垃圾分类的影响因素:基于半非参数估计扩展模型的实证分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 16;13:1000601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000601. eCollection 2022.
4
The Perception and Attitude of Farmers toward Domestic Waste Classifications: A Case Study on Wusheng County, Sichuan Province, China.农民对生活垃圾分类的认知和态度:以四川省武胜县为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013499.
5
Are Farmers Willing to Substitute Tobacco Cultivation? Evidence From Lichuan City, China.农民愿意替代烟草种植吗?来自中国利川市的证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Apr 28;24(6):897-903. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab264.
6
Assessing the impact of farmers' willingness to pay on different cultivated land attribute levels in China: an empirical analysis using the choice experiment method.评估中国农民支付意愿对不同耕地属性水平的影响:基于选择实验法的实证分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74280-0.
7
Farmers' Preference for Participating in Rural Solid Waste Management: A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China.农民参与农村固体废物管理的意愿:来自中国陕西省的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114440.
8
Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers' Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective.中国河南农民绿色处置农药包装废弃物的意愿和行为:感知价值形成机制视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3753. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113753.
9
Effect of ecoliteracy on farmers' participation in pesticide packaging waste governance behavior in rural North China.生态素养对中国北方农村地区农民参与农药包装废弃物治理行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):23103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73858-y.
10
Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions.从农民认知角度看影响农业绿色生产意愿的因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:140289. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140289. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic incentive in enhancing community waste separation and collection: A panel data analysis in China.经济激励在增强社区垃圾分类和收集中的作用:来自中国的面板数据分析。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Feb;42(2):158-166. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231178215. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
2
Influencing factors of farmers' participation in domestic waste classification: An empirical analysis based on the semi-nonparametric estimation extended model.农民参与生活垃圾分类的影响因素:基于半非参数估计扩展模型的实证分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 16;13:1000601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000601. eCollection 2022.
3
How does digital governance affect the level of domestic waste separation for rural residents? Empirical evidence from rural areas in Jiangsu Province, China.
数字治理如何影响农村居民的垃圾分类水平?来自中国江苏省农村地区的经验证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;11:1122705. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122705. eCollection 2023.
4
Information publicity and resident's waste separation behavior: An empirical study based on the norm activation model.信息宣传与居民垃圾分类行为:基于规范激活模型的实证研究。
Waste Manag. 2019 Mar 15;87:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: A case study in Hangzhou.中国农村地区垃圾源头分类绩效、影响因素与管理策略:以杭州市为例。
Waste Manag. 2019 Apr 15;89:313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.020.
6
From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?从意图到行动:个人态度、设施可达性和政府激励如何影响家庭垃圾分类?
J Environ Manage. 2019 Mar 1;233:447-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
7
Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study.经济激励和社会影响克服家庭垃圾分类困境:一项实地干预研究。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Classification and management of asbestos-containing waste: European legislation and the Italian experience.含石棉废物的分类和管理:欧洲法规和意大利经验。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:130-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Feb 22.