Li Hao, Xu Mi, Chang Wei-Yew, Feng Linhan
School of Economics, Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, 730000, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 10;14(1):23648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74280-0.
Exploring farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for cultivated land protection and its influencing factors is key to promoting their enthusiasm for participating in cultivated land pollution governance. However, existing studies often overlook the differences in farmers' preference for different levels of cultivated land attributes and the issue of intertemporal choice in farmers' WTP, thus lowering the effectiveness of cultivated land protection policies. Using survey data from 646 small farmers in Shandong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang provinces of China, this study empirically analyzes the impact of time preference on farmers' WTP for cultivated land attribute levels by utilizing the choice experiment method, measures the relative importance of different cultivated land attributes and attribute levels to farmers, and calculates farmers' WTP for different cultivated land attribute levels. The results revealed that farmers are generally reluctant to pay for cultivated land protection. Time preference affects farmers' WTP for different levels of cultivated land attributes, with future-biased preference increasing farmers' WTP and present-biased preference inhibiting it. Furthermore, for farmers, the relative importance of cultivated land attributes is in the order of cultivated land quality, cultivated land surrounding landscape and ecological environment, cultivated land social security function, and cultivated land area. The most crucial cultivated land attribute level is the improved cultivated land quality, with an average WTP of 3290.625 CNY per hectare (approximately 459.117 USD). In contrast, the least important cultivated land attribute level is the unchanged cultivated land area, with an average WTP of 1001.250 CNY per hectare (approximately 139.697 USD). The economic benefits of cultivated land protection in the sampled provinces can reach 353.892 million CNY per year (approximately 49.376 million USD) annually, which is calculated based on vegetable planting area. Our results suggest that the government should diversify farmers' sources of income while increasing the amount of income, thereby reducing barriers to farmers' payment. Simultaneously, farmers' time preferences should be considered to guide them toward expecting long-term benefits and encouraging their active participation in cultivated land pollution governance. Moreover, cultivated land protection policies should match the preference of farmers for cultivated land attributes and attribute levels, and a limited fiscal fund should be allocated to the cultivated land attributes (i.e., cultivated land quality) and attribute levels (i.e., improved cultivated land quality) preferred by farmers to improve policy efficiency. This study highlights the importance of encouraging farmers to actively participate in cultivated land pollution governance and improving the allocation efficiency of the government's cultivated land protection fund.
探究农民对耕地保护的支付意愿(WTP)及其影响因素,是提升他们参与耕地污染治理积极性的关键。然而,现有研究往往忽视了农民对不同水平耕地属性偏好的差异以及农民支付意愿中的跨期选择问题,从而降低了耕地保护政策的有效性。本研究利用中国山东、江苏和浙江三省646位小农户的调查数据,运用选择实验法实证分析了时间偏好对农民对耕地属性水平支付意愿的影响,测度了不同耕地属性及其水平对农民的相对重要性,并计算了农民对不同耕地属性水平的支付意愿。结果显示,农民普遍不愿为耕地保护付费。时间偏好影响农民对不同水平耕地属性的支付意愿,未来偏向型偏好会增加农民的支付意愿,而当前偏向型偏好则会抑制支付意愿。此外,对农民而言,耕地属性的相对重要性依次为耕地质量、耕地周边景观与生态环境、耕地社会保障功能、耕地面积。最关键的耕地属性水平是耕地质量改善,平均每公顷支付意愿为3290.625元人民币(约合459.117美元)。相比之下,最不重要的耕地属性水平是耕地面积不变,平均每公顷支付意愿为1001.250元人民币(约合139.697美元)。基于蔬菜种植面积计算,抽样省份每年的耕地保护经济效益可达3.53892亿元人民币(约合4937.6万美元)。我们的研究结果表明,政府应在增加农民收入的同时实现收入来源多样化,从而减少农民支付的障碍。同时,应考虑农民的时间偏好,引导他们期待长期利益并鼓励他们积极参与耕地污染治理。此外,耕地保护政策应与农民对耕地属性及其水平的偏好相匹配,将有限的财政资金分配给农民偏好的耕地属性(即耕地质量)及其水平(即耕地质量改善),以提高政策效率。本研究凸显了鼓励农民积极参与耕地污染治理以及提高政府耕地保护资金配置效率的重要性。