Matheson Granville J, Zanderigo Francesca, Miller Jeffrey M, Bartlett Elizabeth A, Mann J John, Ogden R Todd
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, 10032 NY, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, 10032 NY, USA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Mar 12:2024.03.12.584569. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.12.584569.
The serotonin 1A receptor has been linked to both the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) and the antidepressant action of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Most PET studies of the serotonin 1A receptor in MDD used the receptor antagonist radioligand, [carbonyl-C]WAY100635; however the interpretation of the combined results has been contentious owing to reports of higher or lower binding in MDD with different outcome measures. The reasons for these divergent results originate from several sources, including properties of the radiotracer itself, which complicate its quantification and interpretation; as well as from previously reported differences between MDD and healthy volunteers in both reference tissue binding and plasma free fraction, which are typically assumed not to differ. Recently, we have developed two novel hierarchical multivariate methods which we validated for the quantification and analysis of [C]WAY100635, which show better accuracy and inferential efficiency compared to standard analysis approaches. Importantly, these new methods should theoretically be more resilient to many of the factors thought to have caused the discrepancies observed in previous studies. We sought to apply these methods in the largest [C]WAY100635 sample to date, consisting of 160 individuals, including 103 MDD patients, of whom 50 were not-recently-medicated and 53 were antidepressant-exposed, as well as 57 healthy volunteers. While the outcome measure discrepancies were substantial using conventional univariate analysis, our multivariate analysis techniques instead yielded highly consistent results across PET outcome measures and across pharmacokinetic models, with all approaches showing higher serotonin 1A autoreceptor binding potential in the raphe nuclei of not-recently-medicated MDD patients relative to both healthy volunteers and antidepressant-exposed MDD patients. Moreover, with the additional precision of estimates afforded by this approach, we can show that while binding is also higher in projection areas in this group, these group differences are approximately half of those in the raphe nuclei, which are statistically distinguishable from one another. These results are consistent with the biological role of the serotonin 1A autoreceptor in the raphe nuclei in regulating serotonin neuron firing and release, and with preclinical and clinical evidence of deficient serotonin activity in MDD due to over expression of autoreceptors resulting from genetic and/or epigenetic effects. These results are also consistent with downregulation of autoreceptors as a mechanism of action of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In summary, the results using multivariate analysis approaches therefore demonstrate both face and convergent validity, and may serve to provide a resolution and consensus interpretation for the disparate results of previous studies examining the serotonin 1A receptor in MDD.
血清素1A受体与重度抑郁症(MDD)的病理生理学以及血清素再摄取抑制剂的抗抑郁作用均有关联。大多数关于MDD患者血清素1A受体的PET研究使用受体拮抗剂放射性配体[羰基 - C]WAY100635;然而,由于不同研究结果测量方式下MDD患者中该受体结合水平有高有低的报道,综合结果的解读一直存在争议。这些不同结果的原因源于多个方面,包括放射性示踪剂本身的特性,这使其定量和解读变得复杂;以及先前报道的MDD患者与健康志愿者在参考组织结合和血浆游离分数方面的差异,而这些差异通常被认为不存在。最近,我们开发了两种新颖的分层多变量方法,并对其进行了验证,用于[C]WAY100635的定量和分析,与标准分析方法相比,这两种方法显示出更高的准确性和推理效率。重要的是,从理论上讲,这些新方法对许多被认为是导致先前研究中出现差异的因素具有更强的适应性。我们试图将这些方法应用于迄今为止最大的[C]WAY100635样本,该样本由160名个体组成,包括103名MDD患者,其中50名近期未接受药物治疗,53名正在接受抗抑郁药物治疗,以及57名健康志愿者。虽然使用传统单变量分析时结果测量差异很大,但我们的多变量分析技术在PET结果测量和药代动力学模型中均产生了高度一致的结果,所有方法均显示,相对于健康志愿者和接受抗抑郁药物治疗的MDD患者,近期未接受药物治疗的MDD患者中缝核的血清素1A自身受体结合潜力更高。此外,通过这种方法提供的估计精度,我们可以表明,虽然该组投射区域的结合也较高,但这些组间差异约为中缝核差异的一半,且在统计学上彼此可区分。这些结果与血清素1A自身受体在中缝核中调节血清素神经元放电和释放的生物学作用一致,也与MDD中由于遗传和/或表观遗传效应导致自身受体过度表达而使血清素活性不足的临床前和临床证据一致。这些结果还与自身受体下调作为选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂作用机制一致。总之,使用多变量分析方法得到的结果因此证明了表面效度和聚合效度,并可能为先前研究MDD患者血清素1A受体时出现的不同结果提供一种解决方案和共识性解释。