• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用自我报告的客观智能手机使用数据检验青少年智能手机普及量表的有效性。

Testing the validity of the smartphone pervasiveness scale for adolescents with self-reported objective smartphone use data.

作者信息

Chakraborty Shobhik, Gui Marco, Gerosa Tiziano, Marciano Laura

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Mar 29;10:20552076241234744. doi: 10.1177/20552076241234744. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241234744
PMID:38559580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10981259/
Abstract

An ongoing and heated scientific debate pertains to the conceptualization and quantification of adolescents' problematic smartphone use (PSU). To address the limitations of existing surveys, the smartphone pervasiveness scale for adolescents (SPS-A) has been designed to measure the subjective frequency of smartphone usage during significant moments within daily routines. Given the weak correlations in prior literature between self-reported PSU metrics and objective use data, this study investigates the relationships between diverse self-reported objective metrics of smartphone engagement-that is duration, frequency, and count of notifications-and the SPS-A scale, employing a cohort of Swiss adolescents ( = 1396; = 15.8, SD= 0.81; 59% female). The findings reveal a substantial correlation between the total objectively measured duration of smartphone engagement and the SPS-A scale ( = .41 for iOS users and  = .42 for Android users). Moreover, a similar trend emerges as users are categorized by their level of objective use, with each category displaying a linear augmentation in smartphone pervasiveness levels. Instead, modest correlations emerge when considering the quantity of device unlocks and notifications. Noteworthy, no gender disparities emerged. These results add to our knowledge about the usefulness of the concept and measurement of smartphone pervasiveness: not only the SPS-A is a valid alternative to scales on "smartphone addiction" to capture non-pathological PSU, but it is also a better predictor of smartphone objective duration of use than self-reported measures. The correlation found between self-reported pervasiveness and actual use is discussed in light of the debate about the relevance of screen time in the study of PSU.

摘要

一场持续且激烈的科学辩论围绕青少年问题智能手机使用(PSU)的概念化和量化展开。为解决现有调查的局限性,设计了青少年智能手机普及量表(SPS - A),以测量日常活动重要时刻的智能手机使用主观频率。鉴于先前文献中自我报告的PSU指标与客观使用数据之间的相关性较弱,本研究调查了智能手机使用的各种自我报告客观指标(即使用时长、频率和通知数量)与SPS - A量表之间的关系,研究对象为一组瑞士青少年(n = 1396;平均年龄 = 15.8岁,标准差 = 0.81;59%为女性)。研究结果显示,客观测量的智能手机使用总时长与SPS - A量表之间存在显著相关性(iOS用户r = 0.41,安卓用户r = 0.42)。此外,按客观使用水平对用户进行分类时也出现了类似趋势,每个类别在智能手机普及程度上都呈线性增加。相反,在考虑设备解锁次数和通知数量时,相关性较弱。值得注意的是,未出现性别差异。这些结果增加了我们对智能手机普及概念及测量有用性的认识:SPS - A不仅是捕捉非病理性PSU的“智能手机成瘾”量表的有效替代方法,而且在预测智能手机客观使用时长方面比自我报告测量方法更好。根据关于PSU研究中屏幕时间相关性的辩论,讨论了自我报告的普及程度与实际使用之间的相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/ede7c7ef20c5/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/04886dbd3eaa/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/5fd5f9d960d8/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/dbc663d86f14/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/ede7c7ef20c5/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/04886dbd3eaa/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/5fd5f9d960d8/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/dbc663d86f14/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d23d/10981259/ede7c7ef20c5/10.1177_20552076241234744-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing the validity of the smartphone pervasiveness scale for adolescents with self-reported objective smartphone use data.利用自我报告的客观智能手机使用数据检验青少年智能手机普及量表的有效性。
Digit Health. 2024 Mar 29;10:20552076241234744. doi: 10.1177/20552076241234744. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Duration, frequency, and time distortion: Which is the best predictor of problematic smartphone use in adolescents? A trace data study.使用时长、使用频率和时间扭曲:哪项因素能更好地预测青少年智能手机使用问题?一项追踪数据研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263815. eCollection 2022.
3
The Relationship between Social Anxiety, Smartphone Use, Dispositional Trust, and Problematic Smartphone Use: A Moderated Mediation Model.社交焦虑、智能手机使用、性格信任与智能手机问题使用之间的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052452.
4
The influence of meaning in life on children and adolescents' problematic smartphone use: A three-wave multiple mediation model.生活意义对儿童和青少年问题性智能手机使用的影响:三波多次中介模型。
Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;126:107199. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107199. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
5
Determination of the cutoff point for Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale for adolescents: a latent profile analysis.基于智能手机应用的青少年成瘾量表切点的确定:潜在剖面分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05170-4.
6
Does the Type of Smartphone Usage Behavior Influence Problematic Smartphone Use and the Related Stress Perception?智能手机使用行为的类型会影响问题性智能手机使用及相关压力感知吗?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 9;12(4):99. doi: 10.3390/bs12040099.
7
Meaning in Life and Self-Control Mediate the Potential Contribution of Harsh Parenting to Adolescents' Problematic Smartphone Use: Longitudinal Multi-Group Analyses.生活意义和自我控制在严厉教养对青少年问题性智能手机使用的潜在贡献中的中介作用:纵向多群组分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP2159-NP2181. doi: 10.1177/08862605221099495. Epub 2022 May 17.
8
Sleep quality as a mediator of problematic smartphone use and clinical health symptoms.睡眠质量作为智能手机使用问题和临床健康症状的中介。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):466-472. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.40. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Association between problematic smartphone use, chronotype and nonsuicidal self-injury among adolescents: A large-scale study in China.青少年中智能手机使用问题、昼夜类型与非自杀性自伤的关联:一项中国的大规模研究。
Addict Behav. 2023 Sep;144:107725. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107725. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
Development and validation of the while-in-bed-smartphone-use-induced sleep procrastination scale (WSPS) in Chinese undergraduates with/without problematic smartphone use.发展并验证了中文版智能手机卧床使用诱导睡眠拖延量表(WSPS),适用于有/无问题性智能手机使用的中国大学生。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3085-3098. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03457-3. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Earlier smartphone acquisition negatively impacts language proficiency, but only for heavy media users. Results from a longitudinal quasi-experimental study. 早期智能手机的获取会对语言熟练度产生负面影响,但仅针对重度媒体使用者。一项纵向准实验研究的结果。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Aug;114:102915. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102915. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
2
Differences between problematic internet and smartphone use and their psychological risk factors in boys and girls: a network analysis.男孩和女孩中网络与智能手机使用问题及其心理风险因素的差异:一项网络分析
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jun 12;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00620-z.
3
Persistence of Lockdown Consequences on Children: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study.
封锁措施对儿童的影响持续存在:一项横断面比较研究。
Children (Basel). 2022 Dec 8;9(12):1927. doi: 10.3390/children9121927.
4
Duration, frequency, and time distortion: Which is the best predictor of problematic smartphone use in adolescents? A trace data study.使用时长、使用频率和时间扭曲:哪项因素能更好地预测青少年智能手机使用问题?一项追踪数据研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263815. eCollection 2022.
5
Associations between symptoms of problematic smartphone, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram use: An item-level exploratory graph analysis perspective.智能手机、Facebook、WhatsApp 和 Instagram 使用问题症状之间的关联:项目层面的探索性图形分析视角。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Aug 13;9(3):686-697. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00036. Print 2020 Oct 12.
6
Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence.儿童和青少年中智能手机使用问题及相关心理健康结果的流行率:系统评价、荟萃分析和证据的 GRADE 评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2350-x.
7
Problematic smartphone use: Digital approaches to an emerging public health problem.智能手机使用问题:应对新出现的公共卫生问题的数字化方法。
Digit Health. 2018 Mar 5;4:2055207618759167. doi: 10.1177/2055207618759167. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
8
Determining Typical Smartphone Usage: What Data Do We Need?确定典型智能手机使用情况:我们需要哪些数据?
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Jun;21(6):395-398. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0652. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use.超越自我报告:比较估计的和现实世界中智能手机使用情况的工具。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0139004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139004. eCollection 2015.
10
The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents.智能手机成瘾量表:青少年版的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. eCollection 2013.