Vinicki Juan Pablo, Cusa Alejandra, Domingo Daniela, Velasco Zamora José Luis, Magri Sebastián, Brigante Alejandro, Schmid Maria Marcela, Ávila Paola, Zamora Natalia, Sorrentino Laura, Rodriguez Anabella M, Linarez Miguel, Pisoni Cecilia, Costi Carolina, Rodriguez Gil Gustavo, Spinetto María Andrea, Paris Vanesa Ursula, Perrotta Natalia, Maliandi María Del Rosario, Rillo Oscar, Pena Claudia, Got Julio, Cavallasca Javier, Machado Escobar Maximiliano, Iturralde Carolina, Martire María Victoria, Tessel Romina, Chocobar N Saravia, Alarcon Graciela
Sección Reumatología, Hospital de Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
IARI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024 Mar 21;8(2):rkae033. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae033. eCollection 2024.
The need for glucocorticoid-sparing drugs (GCSD) remains an important issue and is an unmet need in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We therefore aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of methotrexate (MTX) and of leflunomide (LEF) in daily clinical practice in PMR patients from Argentina.
A multicentre and observational study (medical records review) of PMR patients seen between 2007 and 2023, who had at least three months of follow-up after starting a GCSD, either MTX or LEF, was performed. Results are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges [25th-75th (IQR)] for continuous variables and percentages for categorical ones. The two treatment groups were compared using χ test for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the log-rank test for time-to-event data. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression. In all cases, a -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
One-hundred and eighty-six patients (79% female) with a median age of 72 years (IQR, 65-77 years) were included. One-hundred and forty-three patients (77%) were prescribed MTX (15, IQR 10-15) and 43 (23%) LEF (20 mg, fixed dose). Flare-ups (relapses and recurrences) occurred in 13 patients (7%) and were comparable between both groups. Persistent GCSD intake was observed in 145 patients (78%). Glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal was achieved in 67 of these 145 patients (46%) and this occurred more frequently in the LEF group (). Furthermore, time until prednisone discontinuation was shorter in the LEF-treated patients (4.7 months, IQR 3-20 on LEF versus 31.8 months, IQR 10-82 on MTX, ). Remission was found more frequently in the LEF group (). In the multivariate analysis, the probability of remission was higher with LEF therapy (=0.010) and this finding persisted in the subgroup analysis who were followed up < 40 months (OR 3.12, 95% CI = 1.30-7.47, = 0.011).
This study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of LEF and even its superiority in achieving remission when compared with MTX as GCSD in PMR patients. Further research is needed to support these findings.
对糖皮质激素节约药物(GCSD)的需求仍然是一个重要问题,在风湿性多肌痛(PMR)的治疗中这一需求尚未得到满足。因此,我们旨在评估甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和来氟米特(LEF)在阿根廷PMR患者日常临床实践中的有效性和安全性。
对2007年至2023年间就诊的PMR患者进行了一项多中心观察性研究(病历回顾),这些患者在开始使用GCSD(MTX或LEF)后至少随访了三个月。连续变量的结果以中位数和四分位数间距[第25 - 75百分位数(IQR)]表示,分类变量的结果以百分比表示。使用χ检验比较分类变量的两个治疗组,使用曼 - 惠特尼U检验比较连续变量,使用对数秩检验比较事件发生时间数据。使用逻辑回归计算粗比值比(OR)和调整后的比值比以及95%置信区间(CI)。在所有情况下,P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
纳入了186例患者(79%为女性),中位年龄为72岁(IQR,65 - 77岁)。143例患者(77%)被处方使用MTX(剂量15,IQR 10 - 15),43例(23%)使用LEF(20mg,固定剂量)。13例患者(7%)出现病情复发(复发和再发),两组之间相当。145例患者(78%)持续使用GCSD。在这145例患者中有67例(46%)实现了糖皮质激素(GC)撤减,且在LEF组更常见()。此外,LEF治疗的患者停用泼尼松的时间更短(4.7个月,LEF组IQR 3 - 20,MTX组为31.8个月,IQR 10 - 82,)。LEF组缓解更为常见()。在多变量分析中,LEF治疗缓解的概率更高(P = 0.010),这一发现在随访<40个月的亚组分析中持续存在(OR 3.12,95%CI = 1.30 - 7.47,P = 0.011)。
本研究证明了LEF的临床有效性,甚至在作为PMR患者的GCSD与MTX相比时,在实现缓解方面具有优越性。需要进一步的研究来支持这些发现。