Suppr超能文献

麻醉住院医师教学服务对麻醉控制时间和术后患者结局的影响:一项针对15084例手术病例的回顾性观察研究。

The impact of an anesthesia residency teaching service on anesthesia-controlled time and postsurgical patient outcomes: a retrospective observational study on 15,084 surgical cases.

作者信息

Lynch Davene, Mongan Paul D, Hoefnagel Amie L

机构信息

University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA.

University of Florida College of Medicine- Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, 32209, Jacksonville, FL, Box C-72, USA.

出版信息

Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Apr 1;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00394-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding the impact of anesthesia residents on operating room efficiency and patient safety outcomes. This investigation hypothesized that supervised anesthesiology residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled or prolonged extubation times compared to supervised certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNA)/certified anesthesiologist assistants (CAA) or anesthesiologists working independently. Secondary objectives included differences in critical outcomes such as intraoperative hypotension, cardiac and pulmonary complications, acute kidney injury, and mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center 24-month (January 1, 2020- December 31, 2021) cohort focused on primary outcomes of anesthesia-controlled times and prolonged extubation (>15 min) with additional assessment of secondary patient outcomes in adult patients having general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway for elective non-cardiac surgery. The study excluded sedation, obstetric, endoscopic, ophthalmology, and non-operating room procedures. Procedures were divided into three groups: anesthesiologists working solo, anesthesiologists supervising residents, or anesthesiologists supervising CRNA/CAAs. After univariate analysis, multivariable models were constructed to control for the univariate cofactor differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 15,084 surgical cases met the inclusion criteria for this study for the three different care models: solo anesthesiologists (1,204 cases), anesthesiologist/resident pairing (3,146 cases), and anesthesiologist/CRNA/CAA (14,040 cases). Before multivariate analysis, the resident group exhibited longer anesthesia-controlled times (median, [interquartile range], 26.1 [21.7-32.0], p < 0.001), compared to CRNA/CAA (23.9 [19.7-29.5]), and attending-only surgical cases (21.0 [17.9-25.4]). After adjusting for covariates in a general linear regression model (age, BMI, ASA classification, comorbidities, arterial line insertion, surgical service, and surgical location), there were no significant differences in the anesthesia-controlled times between the provider groups. Prolonged extubation times (>15 min) were significantly less common in the anesthesiologist-only group compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Despite these time differences, there were no clinically significant differences among the groups in postoperative pulmonary or cardiac complications, renal impairment, or the 30-day mortality rate of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia residents do not increase anesthesia-controlled operating room times or adversely affect clinically relevant patient outcomes compared to anesthesiologists working independently or supervising certified registered nurse anesthetists or certified anesthesiologist assistants.

摘要

背景

关于麻醉住院医师对手术室效率和患者安全结果的影响,现有数据有限。本研究假设,与受监督的注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)/认证麻醉医师助理(CAA)或独立工作的麻醉医师相比,受监督的麻醉住院医师不会增加麻醉控制时间或延长拔管时间。次要目标包括关键结果的差异,如术中低血压、心肺并发症、急性肾损伤和死亡率。

方法

这项回顾性单中心24个月(2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日)队列研究聚焦于麻醉控制时间和延长拔管(>15分钟)的主要结果,并对接受全身麻醉、使用气管内插管或喉罩气道进行择期非心脏手术的成年患者的次要患者结果进行额外评估。该研究排除了镇静、产科、内镜、眼科和非手术室手术。手术分为三组:独立工作的麻醉医师、指导住院医师的麻醉医师或指导CRNA/CAA的麻醉医师。在单因素分析后,构建多变量模型以控制主要和次要结果中的单因素协变量差异。

结果

共有15084例手术病例符合本研究针对三种不同护理模式的纳入标准:独立麻醉医师(1204例)、麻醉医师/住院医师配对(3146例)和麻醉医师/CRNA/CAA(14040例)。在多变量分析之前,与CRNA/CAA组(23.9[19.7-29.5])和仅由主治麻醉医师负责的手术病例组(21.0[17.9-25.4])相比,住院医师组的麻醉控制时间更长(中位数,[四分位间距],26.1[21.7-32.0],p<0.001)。在一般线性回归模型中对协变量(年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级、合并症、动脉置管、手术科室和手术部位)进行调整后,各医疗组之间的麻醉控制时间没有显著差异。与其他组相比,仅由麻醉医师负责的组中延长拔管时间(>15分钟)明显较少见(p<0.001)。尽管存在这些时间差异,但各组之间在术后肺部或心脏并发症、肾功能损害或患者30天死亡率方面没有临床显著差异。

结论

与独立工作或指导注册护士麻醉师或认证麻醉医师助理的麻醉医师相比,麻醉住院医师不会增加麻醉控制的手术室时间,也不会对临床相关的患者结果产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e1a/10985884/4dacb61ad3cd/13037_2024_394_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验