• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款带监测功能的电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的功效:一项交叉随机对照试验

Efficacy of an Electric Toothbrush With Monitor in Dental Plaque Removal: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Yoshinaga Yasunori, Oyama Akinori, Ohgi Kimiko, Maruo Naoki, Yamato Hiroaki, Tsuchimochi Nanako, Nakagami Masanobu, Sakagami Ryuji

机构信息

Section of Periodontology, Department of Odontology, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, JPN.

Oral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55278. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.55278
PMID:38562273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982135/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Plaque control is very important in the treatment of periodontitis. However, plaque is difficult to remove because one cannot see one's own oral cavity. The purpose of this study was to verify the plaque removal effect of a prototype device that has a built-in image sensor in the head of an electric toothbrush, enabling the user to brush while checking the condition of the tooth surface on a monitor in real time and to assess their sense of use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects were 10 fifth-year students from the Graduate School of Dental Science, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka, Japan. The subjects were divided into those who used electric toothbrushes while having the condition of the tooth surface checked with a monitor (monitor group) and those without a monitor (non-monitor group). O'Leary plaque control records before and after brushing and the brushing time were measured, and questionnaires were given to the subjects after brushing. Scaling and professional tooth cleaning were performed after completing the questionnaire. One week later, subjects were switched to the opposite group and had the same measurements and questionnaires. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare both groups before and after the examination at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

The monitor group had significantly better plaque removal than the non-monitor group. In addition, the monitor group spent significantly more time brushing than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Brushing while monitoring oral conditions in real time using an electric toothbrush with a built-in image sensor showed that significantly better plaque removal can be achieved with a longer brushing time.

摘要

背景与目的

菌斑控制在牙周炎治疗中非常重要。然而,由于人们无法看到自己的口腔,菌斑很难清除。本研究的目的是验证一种原型设备的菌斑清除效果,该设备在电动牙刷头部内置图像传感器,使用户能够在实时查看监视器上牙齿表面状况的同时刷牙,并评估他们的使用感受。

材料与方法

受试者为日本福冈齿科大学齿学部研究生院的10名五年级学生。受试者被分为两组,一组在使用电动牙刷时通过监视器检查牙齿表面状况(监视器组),另一组不使用监视器(非监视器组)。测量刷牙前后的奥利里菌斑控制记录和刷牙时间,并在刷牙后向受试者发放问卷。完成问卷后进行龈上洁治和专业牙齿清洁。一周后,受试者切换到另一组,进行相同的测量和问卷调查。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验,以5%的显著性水平比较两组检查前后的情况。

结果

监视器组的菌斑清除效果明显优于非监视器组。此外,监视器组的刷牙时间明显长于对照组。

结论

使用内置图像传感器的电动牙刷实时监测口腔状况时刷牙表明,刷牙时间越长,菌斑清除效果越好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/cd2844342dfe/cureus-0016-00000055278-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/509b4a7eb3f7/cureus-0016-00000055278-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/708a1376bef8/cureus-0016-00000055278-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/6c2e945bd0bd/cureus-0016-00000055278-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/c7a97ebecb16/cureus-0016-00000055278-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/9f6f6d56a541/cureus-0016-00000055278-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/cd2844342dfe/cureus-0016-00000055278-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/509b4a7eb3f7/cureus-0016-00000055278-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/708a1376bef8/cureus-0016-00000055278-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/6c2e945bd0bd/cureus-0016-00000055278-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/c7a97ebecb16/cureus-0016-00000055278-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/9f6f6d56a541/cureus-0016-00000055278-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15c/10982135/cd2844342dfe/cureus-0016-00000055278-i06.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of an Electric Toothbrush With Monitor in Dental Plaque Removal: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.一款带监测功能的电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的功效:一项交叉随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):e55278. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55278. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Comparison of dental plaque reduction after use of electric toothbrushes with and without QLF-D-applied plaque visualization: a 1-week randomized controlled trial.使用和不使用QLF-D应用菌斑可视化的电动牙刷后牙菌斑减少情况的比较:一项为期1周的随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0982-3.
3
[Clinical analysis of the cleaning effectiveness of toothbrushes of various types in children aged 6-15 years after a single brushing].[6至15岁儿童单次刷牙后不同类型牙刷清洁效果的临床分析]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2021;100(6):76-81. doi: 10.17116/stomat202110006176.
4
Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?新型声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面是否比手动牙刷更有效?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):13-8.
5
Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque.与手动牙刷相比,两种不同刷头的声波电动牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):65-70.
6
Randomized controlled trial assessing plaque removal of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with micro-vibrations.一项评估具有微振功能的往复旋转电动牙刷清除牙菌斑效果的随机对照试验。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S27. doi: 10.1111/idj.12568.
7
Plaque removal efficacy of two electric toothbrushes with different brush head designs.两种不同刷头设计的电动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果
J Dent. 2005 Jun;33 Suppl 1:17-21.
8
Efficacy of electric-powered cleaning instruments in edentulous patients with implant-supported full-arch fixed prostheses: a crossover design.电动清洁器械在种植体支持的全牙弓固定修复无牙颌患者中的疗效:一项交叉设计研究
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Mar 26;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0164-8.
9
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
10
Evaluation of the extent of plaque removal and users' experience of alternative toothbrushes: A randomized single-blind crossover study.评估牙菌斑清除程度及用户对替代牙刷的使用体验:一项随机单盲交叉研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2025 Feb;23(1):203-217. doi: 10.1111/idh.12825. Epub 2024 May 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of powered toothbrushes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.电动牙刷的功效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2022 Feb;20(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/idh.12563. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
Efficacy of oscillating rotating versus side-to-side powered toothbrushes on plaque and gingival index reduction: A systematic review.振荡旋转式电动牙刷与侧向旋转式电动牙刷在减少菌斑和牙龈指数方面的疗效:系统评价。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Feb;152(2):115-126.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Dental Plaque Removal by Ultrasonic Toothbrushes.
超声波牙刷去除牙菌斑
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Mar 23;8(1):28. doi: 10.3390/dj8010028.
4
How effective is a powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush? A systematic review and meta-analysis of single brushing exercises.电动牙刷相对于手动牙刷的效果如何?单次刷牙的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2020 Feb;18(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/idh.12401. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
A new tooth brushing approach supported by an innovative hybrid toothbrush-compared reduction of dental plaque after a single use versus an oscillating-rotating powered toothbrush.一种新型的刷牙方法,通过使用一种新型的混合牙刷来支持,与使用传统的旋转式电动牙刷相比,单次使用后对牙菌斑的减少效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0647-7.
6
Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis a meta review.家庭护理方案在机械性菌斑清除治疗牙龈炎中的疗效:一项Meta综述
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S77-91. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12359.
7
The efficacy of powered toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review.刷牙练习后电动牙刷的功效:一项系统评价
Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Feb;14(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/idh.12115. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
8
A randomized 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush to a new sonic brush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque.一项为期12周的随机临床对照试验,比较一款旋转振动牙刷与一款新型声波牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):26-31.
9
A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.一项为期六周的临床评估,比较一款采用新型刷头、带有成角度交叉刷毛的旋转振荡电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在清除牙菌斑和治疗牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):6-12.
10
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.