Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MarylandUSA.
14th Field Hospital, Fort Stewart, GeorgiaUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Apr;39(2):151-155. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X24000207. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Identifying patients at imminent risk of death is critical in the management of trauma patients. This study measures the vital sign thresholds associated with death among trauma patients.
This study included data from patients ≥15 years of age in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database. Patients with vital signs of zero were excluded. Documented prehospital and emergency department (ED) vital signs included systolic pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and calculated shock index (SI). The area under the receiver operator curves (AUROC) was used to assess the accuracy of these variables for predicting 24-hour survival. Optimal thresholds to predict mortality were identified using Youden's Index, 90% specificity, and 90% sensitivity. Additional analyses examined patients 70+ years of age.
There were 1,439,221 subjects in the 2019-2020 datasets that met inclusion for this analysis with <0.1% (10,270) who died within 24 hours. The optimal threshold for prehospital systolic pressure was 110, pulse rate was 110, SI was 0.9, and respiratory rate was 15. The optimal threshold for the ED systolic was 112, pulse rate was 107, SI was 0.9, and respiratory rate was 21. Among the elderly sub-analysis, the optimal threshold for prehospital systolic was 116, pulse rate was 100, SI was 0.8, and respiratory rate was 21. The optimal threshold for ED systolic was 121, pulse rate was 95, SI was 0.8, and respiratory rate was 0.8.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and SI offered the best predictor of mortality among trauma patients. The SBP values predictive of mortality were significantly higher than the traditional 90mmHg threshold. This dataset highlights the need for better methods to guide resuscitation as initial vital signs have limited accuracy in predicting subsequent mortality.
识别即将死亡的创伤患者至关重要。本研究测量了与创伤患者死亡相关的生命体征阈值。
本研究纳入了美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划(TQIP)数据库中≥15 岁患者的数据。排除生命体征为零的患者。记录的院前和急诊(ED)生命体征包括收缩压、心率、呼吸频率和计算的休克指数(SI)。使用接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积评估这些变量预测 24 小时生存率的准确性。使用约登指数、90%特异性和 90%敏感性确定最佳阈值以预测死亡率。进一步的分析检查了 70 岁以上的患者。
在 2019-2020 年的数据集中有 1439221 例符合纳入标准的患者,其中<0.1%(10270 例)在 24 小时内死亡。院前收缩压的最佳阈值为 110,脉搏率为 110,SI 为 0.9,呼吸频率为 15。ED 收缩压的最佳阈值为 112,脉搏率为 107,SI 为 0.9,呼吸频率为 21。在老年亚组分析中,院前收缩压的最佳阈值为 116,脉搏率为 100,SI 为 0.8,呼吸频率为 21。ED 收缩压的最佳阈值为 121,脉搏率为 95,SI 为 0.8,呼吸频率为 0.8。
收缩压(SBP)和 SI 是创伤患者死亡率的最佳预测指标。预测死亡率的 SBP 值明显高于传统的 90mmHg 阈值。该数据集强调需要更好的方法来指导复苏,因为初始生命体征在预测随后的死亡率方面准确性有限。