• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法预测 2 型糖尿病血管钙化风险:一项回顾性研究。

A machine learning approach to predicting vascular calcification risk of type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China.

Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2024 Apr;47(4):e24264. doi: 10.1002/clc.24264.

DOI:10.1002/clc.24264
PMID:38563389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10985945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have experienced a higher incidence and severer degree of vascular calcification (VC), which leads to an increase in the incidence and mortality of vascular complications in patients with T2DM.

HYPOTHESIS

To construct and validate prediction models for the risk of VC in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Twenty-three baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record system. Ten clinical features were screened with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and were used to develop prediction models based on eight machine learning (ML) algorithms (k-nearest neighbor [k-NN], light gradient boosting machine, logistic regression [LR], multilayer perception [(MLP], Naive Bayes [NB], random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], XGBoost [XGB]). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and precision.

RESULTS

A total of 1407 and 352 patients were retrospectively collected in the training and test sets, respectively. Among the eight models, the AUC value in the NB model was higher than the other models (NB: 0.753, LGB: 0.719, LR: 0.749, MLP: 0.715, RF: 0.722, SVM: 0.689, XGB:0.707, p < .05 for all). The k-NN model achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.633-0.857), the MLP model achieved the highest accuracy of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.767-0.852) and specificity of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.836-0.912).

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a predictive model of VC based on ML and clinical features in type 2 diabetic patients. The NB model is a tool with potential to facilitate clinicians in identifying VC in high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

最近,2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的血管钙化(VC)发生率和严重程度更高,导致 T2DM 患者血管并发症的发生率和死亡率增加。

假设

构建和验证 T2DM 患者 VC 风险的预测模型。

方法

从电子病历系统中提取 23 项基线人口统计学和临床特征。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子法筛选 10 项临床特征,基于 8 种机器学习(ML)算法(k-最近邻[k-NN]、轻梯度提升机、逻辑回归[LR]、多层感知器[(MLP]、朴素贝叶斯[NB]、随机森林[RF]、支持向量机[SVM]、XGBoost[XGB])建立预测模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)、准确性和精度评估模型性能。

结果

共回顾性收集了训练集和测试集的 1407 例和 352 例患者。在 8 种模型中,NB 模型的 AUC 值高于其他模型(NB:0.753、LGB:0.719、LR:0.749、MLP:0.715、RF:0.722、SVM:0.689、XGB:0.707,均为<.05)。k-NN 模型的敏感性最高为 0.75(95%置信区间[CI]:0.633-0.857),MLP 模型的准确性最高为 0.81(95%CI:0.767-0.852),特异性最高为 0.875(95%CI:0.836-0.912)。

结论

本研究基于 ML 和 2 型糖尿病患者的临床特征开发了 VC 预测模型。NB 模型是一种有潜力的工具,可以帮助临床医生识别高危患者的 VC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/1c74b145dc60/CLC-47-e24264-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/f2b3ad8fbb69/CLC-47-e24264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/bf0bd67bc1d7/CLC-47-e24264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/1c74b145dc60/CLC-47-e24264-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/f2b3ad8fbb69/CLC-47-e24264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/bf0bd67bc1d7/CLC-47-e24264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4671/10985945/1c74b145dc60/CLC-47-e24264-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning approach to predicting vascular calcification risk of type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study.机器学习方法预测 2 型糖尿病血管钙化风险:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Apr;47(4):e24264. doi: 10.1002/clc.24264.
2
Multimodality radiomics prediction of radiotherapy-induced the early proctitis and cystitis in rectal cancer patients: a machine learning study.多模态放射组学预测直肠癌患者放疗诱导的早期直肠炎和膀胱炎:一项机器学习研究。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023 Dec 20;10(1). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad0f3e.
3
Machine learning algorithms for predicting COVID-19 mortality in Ethiopia.用于预测埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 死亡率的机器学习算法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):1728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19196-0.
4
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Nomogram Construction for Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.机器学习算法与列线图构建在 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变预测中的比较。
Ophthalmic Res. 2024;67(1):537-548. doi: 10.1159/000541294. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
5
Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.基于机器学习模型的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术后严重并发症风险预测
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2023 Feb;32(2):185-194. doi: 10.17219/acem/152895.
6
Machine learning models for predicting critical illness risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.用于预测新冠肺炎肺炎住院患者危重症风险的机器学习模型
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):1215-1229. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2580.
7
Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.机器学习模型在预测髋部骨折手术后输血可能性中的应用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02550-4. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
8
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
9
Predictive model and risk analysis for peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using machine learning and shapley additive explanation.基于机器学习和 Shapley 加法解释的 2 型糖尿病患者外周血管疾病预测模型和风险分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 28;15:1320335. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1320335. eCollection 2024.
10
Prediction and feature selection of low birth weight using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测和选择低出生体重。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 12;43(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00647-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Regression analysis and validation of risk factors for upper limb dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者改良根治术后上肢功能障碍危险因素的回归分析及验证
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):2614-2628. doi: 10.62347/CZYA6232. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Machine Learning Techniques to Develop Risk Prediction Models for the Risk of Incident Diabetic Retinopathy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cohort Study.运用机器学习技术为 2 型糖尿病患者发生糖尿病视网膜病变的风险开发预测模型:一项队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 17;13:876559. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.876559. eCollection 2022.
2
Machine Learning for the Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Calcification in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Chinese Large Cohort Study.机器学习在非透析慢性肾脏病患者冠状动脉钙化患病率和严重程度中的应用:一项中国大样本队列研究。
J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Nov 1;37(6):401-408. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000657. Epub 2022 May 3.
3
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会临床实践中心血管疾病预防指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 7;42(34):3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
4
Role of coronary artery calcium score in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.冠状动脉钙评分在心血管疾病一级预防中的作用。
BMJ. 2021 May 4;373:n776. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n776.
5
New Model for Predicting the Presence of Coronary Artery Calcification.预测冠状动脉钙化存在的新模型
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):457. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030457.
6
Supervised Machine Learning: A Brief Primer.监督机器学习:简介。
Behav Ther. 2020 Sep;51(5):675-687. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Vascular Calcification-New Insights Into Its Mechanism.血管钙化——机制的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 13;21(8):2685. doi: 10.3390/ijms21082685.
8
Machine Learning for Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Cardiac CT: A Survey.用于心脏CT中冠状动脉疾病评估的机器学习:一项综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Nov 26;6:172. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00172. eCollection 2019.
9
Increasing the Impact of JMIR Journals in the Attention Economy.增强JMIR期刊在注意力经济中的影响力。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 31;21(10):e16172. doi: 10.2196/16172.
10
Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine.医学成像中的人工智能:威胁还是机遇?放射科医生再次站在医学创新的前沿。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Oct 24;2(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6.