Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Department of Population Health University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Divergent conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (11th ed..; ICD-11) significantly confounds both research and practice. Using a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth (N = 1,542, age range: 8-20 years), we compared these two diagnostic approaches along with an expanded version of the ICD-11 PTSD criteria that included three additional reexperiencing symptoms (ICD-11+). Within the sample, PTSD was more prevalent using the DSM-5 criteria (25.7%) compared to the ICD-11 criteria (16.0%), with moderate agreement between these diagnostic systems, κ = .57. The inclusion of additional reexperiencing symptoms (i.e., ICD-11+) reduced this discrepancy in prevalence (24.7%) and increased concordance with DSM-5 criteria, κ = .73. All three PTSD classification systems exhibited similar comorbidity rates with major depressive episode (MDE) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; 78.0%-83.6%). Most youths who met the DSM-5 PTSD criteria also met the criteria for ICD-11 PTSD, MDE, or GAD (88.4%), and this proportion increased when applying the ICD-11+ criteria (95.5%). Symptom-level analyses identified reexperiencing/intrusions and negative alterations in cognition and mood symptoms as primary sources of discrepancy between the DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic systems. Overall, these results challenge assertions that nonspecific distress and diagnostically overlapping symptoms within DSM-5 PTSD inflate comorbidity with depressive and anxiety disorders. Further, they support the argument that the DSM-5 PTSD criteria can be refined and simplified without reducing the overall prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in youth.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版;DSM-5)和《国际疾病分类》(第十一次修订版;ICD-11)对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的不同概念化,严重混淆了研究和实践。本研究使用了一个不同的创伤后青少年样本(N=1542,年龄范围:8-20 岁),比较了这两种诊断方法,以及 ICD-11 PTSD 标准的扩展版本,其中包括另外三个再体验症状(ICD-11+)。在样本中,使用 DSM-5 标准(25.7%)比 ICD-11 标准(16.0%)更常见 PTSD,这两种诊断系统之间的一致性中等,κ=0.57。纳入额外的再体验症状(即 ICD-11+)减少了流行率的差异(24.7%),并提高了与 DSM-5 标准的一致性,κ=0.73。所有三种 PTSD 分类系统与重性抑郁发作(MDE)或广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的共病率相似(78.0%-83.6%)。大多数符合 DSM-5 PTSD 标准的青少年也符合 ICD-11 PTSD、MDE 或 GAD 的标准(88.4%),当应用 ICD-11+标准时,这一比例增加到 95.5%。症状水平分析确定了再体验/闯入和认知及情绪症状的负性改变是 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 PTSD 诊断系统之间差异的主要原因。总的来说,这些结果挑战了非特异性痛苦和 DSM-5 PTSD 中诊断上重叠的症状会增加与抑郁和焦虑障碍共病的说法。此外,它们支持了这样一种观点,即 DSM-5 PTSD 标准可以在不降低青少年总体精神诊断流行率的情况下得到细化和简化。