• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤暴露青年样本中的诊断标准。

Comparing diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Department of Population Health University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1002/jts.23037
PMID:38565718
Abstract

Divergent conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (11th ed..; ICD-11) significantly confounds both research and practice. Using a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth (N = 1,542, age range: 8-20 years), we compared these two diagnostic approaches along with an expanded version of the ICD-11 PTSD criteria that included three additional reexperiencing symptoms (ICD-11+). Within the sample, PTSD was more prevalent using the DSM-5 criteria (25.7%) compared to the ICD-11 criteria (16.0%), with moderate agreement between these diagnostic systems, κ = .57. The inclusion of additional reexperiencing symptoms (i.e., ICD-11+) reduced this discrepancy in prevalence (24.7%) and increased concordance with DSM-5 criteria, κ = .73. All three PTSD classification systems exhibited similar comorbidity rates with major depressive episode (MDE) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; 78.0%-83.6%). Most youths who met the DSM-5 PTSD criteria also met the criteria for ICD-11 PTSD, MDE, or GAD (88.4%), and this proportion increased when applying the ICD-11+ criteria (95.5%). Symptom-level analyses identified reexperiencing/intrusions and negative alterations in cognition and mood symptoms as primary sources of discrepancy between the DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD diagnostic systems. Overall, these results challenge assertions that nonspecific distress and diagnostically overlapping symptoms within DSM-5 PTSD inflate comorbidity with depressive and anxiety disorders. Further, they support the argument that the DSM-5 PTSD criteria can be refined and simplified without reducing the overall prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in youth.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版;DSM-5)和《国际疾病分类》(第十一次修订版;ICD-11)对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的不同概念化,严重混淆了研究和实践。本研究使用了一个不同的创伤后青少年样本(N=1542,年龄范围:8-20 岁),比较了这两种诊断方法,以及 ICD-11 PTSD 标准的扩展版本,其中包括另外三个再体验症状(ICD-11+)。在样本中,使用 DSM-5 标准(25.7%)比 ICD-11 标准(16.0%)更常见 PTSD,这两种诊断系统之间的一致性中等,κ=0.57。纳入额外的再体验症状(即 ICD-11+)减少了流行率的差异(24.7%),并提高了与 DSM-5 标准的一致性,κ=0.73。所有三种 PTSD 分类系统与重性抑郁发作(MDE)或广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的共病率相似(78.0%-83.6%)。大多数符合 DSM-5 PTSD 标准的青少年也符合 ICD-11 PTSD、MDE 或 GAD 的标准(88.4%),当应用 ICD-11+标准时,这一比例增加到 95.5%。症状水平分析确定了再体验/闯入和认知及情绪症状的负性改变是 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 PTSD 诊断系统之间差异的主要原因。总的来说,这些结果挑战了非特异性痛苦和 DSM-5 PTSD 中诊断上重叠的症状会增加与抑郁和焦虑障碍共病的说法。此外,它们支持了这样一种观点,即 DSM-5 PTSD 标准可以在不降低青少年总体精神诊断流行率的情况下得到细化和简化。

相似文献

1
Comparing diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth.比较创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤暴露青年样本中的诊断标准。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Examining Rates of Traumatic Events and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults.自闭症成年人创伤性事件发生率及创伤后应激障碍症状研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):374-387. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0022. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Positive Symptoms of Psychosis and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Network Analysis in a Canadian Sample from Montreal: Symptômes positifs de psychose et trouble de stress post-traumatique complexe (CIM-11): Une analyse de réseau dans un échantillon canadien de Montréal.精神病的阳性症状与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)复杂性创伤后应激障碍:来自蒙特利尔的加拿大样本的网络分析:精神病阳性症状与复杂性创伤后应激障碍(ICD - 11):蒙特利尔加拿大样本的网络分析
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 May 15:7067437251337645. doi: 10.1177/07067437251337645.
4
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders.焦虑症合并酒精使用障碍的药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD007505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007505.pub2.
6
Development and validation of the Aarhus Structured Clinical Interview for Prolonged Grief Disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR (A-PGDi).《用于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中持续性悲伤障碍的奥胡斯结构化临床访谈(A-PGDi)的开发与验证》
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2511373. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2511373. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
9
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.治疗师支持的针对成人焦虑症的互联网认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 12;3(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.pub2.
10
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.针对受人道主义危机影响的低收入和中等收入国家精神障碍治疗的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 5;7(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Classes of Adolescent Trauma Exposure, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, and Substance Use Predict Clinical Diagnoses at 12-Month Follow-Up.青少年创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍症状和物质使用的潜在类别可预测12个月随访时的临床诊断。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2025 Jun 20;9:24705470251350144. doi: 10.1177/24705470251350144. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.