Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Tübingen, Germany.
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Jun;59(11):2967-2978. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16321. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Neuromodulation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can transiently alter neural activity, but its spatial precision is low. High-definition (HD) tDCS was introduced to increase spatial precision by placing additional electrodes over the scalp. Initial evaluations of HD tDCS indicated polarity-specific neurophysiological effects-similar to conventional tDCS albeit with greater spatial precision. Here, we compared the effects of cathodal tDCS or HD tDCS in a 4 × 1 configuration over prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions on behavioural outcomes in a magnitude classification task. We report results on overall performance, on the numerical distance effect as a measure of numerical processing, and on the spatial-numerical associations of response codes (SNARC) effect, which was previously affected by prefrontal tDCS. Healthy volunteers (n = 68) received sham or cathodal HD tDCS at 1 mA over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Results were compared to an identical protocol with conventional cathodal tDCS to the left PFC versus sham (n = 64). Mixed effects models showed performance gains relative to sham tDCS in all conditions after tDCS (i.e. 'offline'), whereas montages over PFC and DLPFC already showed performance gains during tDCS (i.e. 'online'). In contrast to conventional tDCS, HD tDCS did not reduce the SNARC effect. Neither condition affected numerical processing, as expected. The results suggest that HD tDCS with cathodal polarity might require further adjustments (i.e. regarding tDCS intensity) for effective modulations of cognitive-behavioural performance, which could be achieved by individualised current density in electric field modelling.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的神经调节可以暂时改变神经活动,但空间精度较低。高清晰度(HD)tDCS 通过在头皮上放置额外的电极来提高空间精度。HD tDCS 的初步评估表明具有极性特异性的神经生理效应-与传统 tDCS 相似,尽管空间精度更高。在这里,我们比较了在额叶皮层(PFC)区域上以 4×1 配置进行的阴极 tDCS 或 HD tDCS 对数量分类任务中行为结果的影响。我们报告了总体表现、作为数量处理衡量标准的数值距离效应(numerical distance effect)以及之前受前额叶 tDCS 影响的反应代码空间-数量关联(SNARC)效应的结果。健康志愿者(n=68)接受了 1 mA 电流强度的假刺激或阴极 HD tDCS 刺激左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)或左额下回(IFG)。结果与传统阴极 tDCS 刺激左 PFC 与假刺激(n=64)的相同方案进行了比较。混合效应模型显示,与假刺激 tDCS 相比,所有条件下 tDCS 后(即“离线”)的表现均有所提高,而 PFC 和 DLPFC 上的刺激模式在 tDCS 期间(即“在线”)就已经表现出了提高。与传统 tDCS 相反,HD tDCS 并没有降低 SNARC 效应。两种条件都没有影响预期的数字处理。结果表明,具有阴极极性的 HD tDCS 可能需要进一步调整(例如关于 tDCS 强度)以有效调节认知行为表现,这可以通过个体化电场建模中的电流密度来实现。