• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原创文章——采用Trifecta™(雅培公司)主动脉瓣置换术的中年患者的中期临床和血流动力学结果:一项单中心研究。

Original Article--Mid-term Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in Middle Age Patients Post Trifecta™ (Abbott) Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-center Study.

作者信息

Khaliel Feras H, Al Aboud Mohammed S, Althibait Suha A, Yezli Saber, Al Muaythir Elaf A, Alamro Bandar, Galzerano Domenico

机构信息

Adult Cardiac Surgery Section, Heart Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 3;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1366. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1366
PMID:38566901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10984674/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trifecta™ is an externally wrapped bovine pericardial aortic valve with a favorable hemodynamic performance and acceptable rate of freedom from structural valve degeneration. However, recent reports of early Trifecta valve failure question its durability. Rheumatic valve disease in young population is predominant, there is no data on the Trifecta performance, durability or safety available worldwide over the middle age population, as well as there are no previous similar reports from Middle East region. We report on mid-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of Trifecta valve in middle age population with small aortic annuls, a single center report.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who underwent Trifecta™ SAVR between June 2014 and December 2019 at a cardiac center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Hemodynamic performance was analyzed by longitudinal Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS

During a 5.5-year period, a total of 24 patients underwent SAVR with Trifecta™ valves at our heart center. Patients had a median age of 47.1 years (IQR = 37) and male:female ratio of 1:1. Patients had a median EuroScoreII of 2 (IQR = 1). The 19 mm valve was the most frequently used (29.2%) followed by the 21 mm and 23 mm (both 25.0%). Concomitant procedure was (54.2%). All patients survived their operations and most (87.0%) had their symptoms relieved. A 30-day mortality rate of 4.2%. Patients were followed up for a median of 58.5 months (IQR = 38), during which 8.3% required re interventions, giving an overall freedom from re-intervention of 91.7%. The re-intervention after valve implantation was recorded in two (8.3%). These re-interventions were performed 3 years post initial surgery and were due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). The mean gradient reduced significantly from 43.6 ± 23.9 mmHg (median = 41, IQR = 21) at baseline to 13.0 ± 7.4 mmHg (median = 11, IQR = 5) one-week post intervention (p < 0.001). The average mean gradients were stable from post-operation to follow-up (13.0 ± 7.4 vs 14.1 ± 6.4 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms excellent mid-term durability, clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta™ valve in middle age population, despite the fact of non-statically significant trend-up of transvalvular gradient over the follow up period. Further long-term studies with larger sample-size are warranted to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

Trifecta™是一种外部包裹牛心包的主动脉瓣,具有良好的血流动力学性能和可接受的结构瓣膜退变发生率。然而,近期有关Trifecta瓣膜早期失效的报道对其耐用性提出了质疑。年轻人群中风湿性瓣膜病占主导,全球范围内尚无关于Trifecta瓣膜在中年人群中的性能、耐用性或安全性的数据,中东地区也没有先前类似的报道。我们报告了Trifecta瓣膜在主动脉瓣环较小的中年人群中的中期临床和血流动力学性能,这是一份单中心报告。

方法

对2014年6月至2019年12月期间在沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家心脏中心接受Trifecta™经导管主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的所有患者进行回顾性研究。通过纵向多普勒超声心动图分析血流动力学性能。

结果

在5.5年期间,我们心脏中心共有24例患者接受了Trifecta™瓣膜的SAVR手术。患者的中位年龄为47.1岁(四分位间距 = 37),男女比例为1:1。患者的中位欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroScoreII)评分为2(四分位间距 = 1)。19毫米瓣膜使用最为频繁(29.2%),其次是21毫米和23毫米瓣膜(均为25.0%)。同期手术率为54.2%。所有患者术后存活,大多数(87.0%)症状得到缓解。30天死亡率为4.2%。患者的中位随访时间为58.5个月(四分位间距 = 38),在此期间,8.3%的患者需要再次干预,总体再次干预率为91.7%。瓣膜植入后有两例(8.3%)进行了再次干预。这些再次干预发生在初次手术后3年,原因是结构瓣膜退变(SVD)。平均压差从基线时的43.6±23.9毫米汞柱(中位数 = 41,四分位间距 = 21)显著降至干预后1周的13.0±7.4毫米汞柱(中位数 = 11,四分位间距 = 5)(p < 0.001)。从术后到随访期间,平均压差平均值保持稳定(13.0±7.4与14.1±6.4毫米汞柱)。

结论

我们的研究证实了Trifecta™瓣膜在中年人群中具有出色的中期耐用性、临床和血流动力学性能,尽管在随访期间跨瓣压差有非统计学意义的上升趋势。需要进一步开展更大样本量的长期研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb94/10984674/759bc92fcd9e/sha1-7f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb94/10984674/759bc92fcd9e/sha1-7f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb94/10984674/759bc92fcd9e/sha1-7f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Original Article--Mid-term Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in Middle Age Patients Post Trifecta™ (Abbott) Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-center Study.原创文章——采用Trifecta™(雅培公司)主动脉瓣置换术的中年患者的中期临床和血流动力学结果:一项单中心研究。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 3;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1366. eCollection 2024.
2
Early hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta™ surgical bioprosthesis aortic valve in Indian patient population: 12 month outcomes of the EVEREST post-market study.Trifecta™ 外科生物人工心脏主动脉瓣膜在印度患者群体中的早期血流动力学表现:EVEREST 上市后研究的 12 个月结果
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Sep 25;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13019-018-0783-9.
3
Durability and Performance of 2298 Trifecta Aortic Valve Prostheses: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.2298 例 Trifecta 主动脉瓣假体的耐久性和性能:倾向匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr;111(4):1198-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Trifecta and Carpentier Edwards aortic bioprostheses: Comparison of six years follow-up outcomes.三尖瓣成形环和卡彭特-爱德华兹生物主动脉瓣:六年随访结果比较。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 May;31(4):312-320. doi: 10.1177/02184923231166339. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Performances of Trifecta and Perimount Bioprostheses following Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后Trifecta和Perimount生物瓣膜的中期临床结果及血流动力学表现
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Mar 24;10(4):139. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040139.
6
Structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve.经 Trifecta 瓣膜置换术后的主动脉瓣结构性瓣膜衰败。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan 1;32(1):39-46. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa236.
7
Long-term durability after surgical aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta and the Intuity valve-a comparative analysis.经 Trifecta 和 Intuity 瓣膜行主动脉瓣置换术后的长期耐久性:一项对比分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):416-424. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab470.
8
Early and mid-term haemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ valve.圣犹达医疗Trifecta™瓣膜的早期和中期血流动力学性能及临床结果
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):889-898. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.15.
9
Trifecta Bioprothesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: Our Experience.用于主动脉瓣置换的三联生物假体:我们的经验
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2017 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):157.
10
Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣在 PARTNER 试验中的纵向血流动力学比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1197-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306.

本文引用的文献

1
Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease aortic valves: Failure mechanisms. trifecta 与 perimount magna ease 主动脉瓣:失效机制。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2022 Sep;30(7):797-806. doi: 10.1177/02184923221100994. Epub 2022 May 22.
2
Long-term durability after surgical aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta and the Intuity valve-a comparative analysis.经 Trifecta 和 Intuity 瓣膜行主动脉瓣置换术后的长期耐久性:一项对比分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):416-424. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab470.
3
Durability and Performance of 2298 Trifecta Aortic Valve Prostheses: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
2298 例 Trifecta 主动脉瓣假体的耐久性和性能:倾向匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr;111(4):1198-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Early structural valve deterioration of a Trifecta bioprosthesis: a minimally invasive redo approach.Trifecta生物假体的早期结构性瓣膜退变:微创再次手术方法
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;57(6):1228. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz321.
5
Trifecta Aortic Bioprosthesis: Midterm Results in 1,953 Patients From a Single Center.三尖瓣成形环:单中心 1953 例患者的中期结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 May;107(5):1356-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.063. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
6
Trifecta vs. Magna for Aortic Valve Replacement - Differences in Clinical Outcome and Valve Hemodynamics.三尖瓣成形术与 Magna 瓣环成形术治疗主动脉瓣置换术的对比 - 临床转归和瓣膜血流动力学的差异。
Circ J. 2018 Oct 25;82(11):2767-2775. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0744. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
7
Early Trifecta valve failure: Report of a cluster of cases from a tertiary care referral center.早期三尖瓣瓣叶失效:一家三级转诊中心的一组病例报告。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Oct;154(4):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.原发性瓣膜反流的非侵入性评估建议:美国超声心动图学会与心血管磁共振学会合作制定的报告
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):303-371. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve.三尖瓣型牛心包主动脉瓣中期、多中心临床及血流动力学结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Mar;153(3):561-569.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
Mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.三尖瓣生物瓣置换治疗主动脉瓣反流的中期耐久性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;153(1):21-28.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.080. Epub 2016 Aug 30.