• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿和幼儿的因果学习:从计算理论到语言实践。

Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices.

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul-Aug;15(4):e1678. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1678. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1002/wcs.1678
PMID:38567762
Abstract

Causal reasoning-the ability to reason about causal relations between events-is fundamental to understanding how the world works. This paper reviews two prominent theories on early causal learning and offers possibilities for theory bridging. Both theories grow out of computational modeling and have significant areas of overlap while differing in several respects. Explanation-Based Learning (EBL) focuses on young infants' learning about causal concepts of physical objects and events, whereas Bayesian models have been used to describe causal reasoning beyond infancy across various concept domains. Connecting the two models offers a more integrated approach to clarifying the developmental processes in causal reasoning from early infancy through later childhood. We further suggest that everyday language practices offer a promising space for theory bridging. We provide a review of selective work on caregiver-child conversations, in particular, on the use of scaffolding language including causal talk and pedagogical questions. Linking the research on language practices to the two cognitive theories, we point out directions for further research to integrate EBL and Bayesian models and clarify how causal learning unfolds in real life. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development.

摘要

因果推理——即对事件之间因果关系进行推理的能力——是理解世界运转方式的基础。本文回顾了两种关于早期因果学习的重要理论,并为理论桥接提供了可能性。这两种理论都源于计算建模,虽然在几个方面存在差异,但有很大的重叠领域。基于解释的学习(EBL)侧重于幼儿对物理对象和事件的因果概念的学习,而贝叶斯模型则被用于描述婴儿期之后各个概念领域的因果推理。连接这两个模型提供了一种更综合的方法,可以从婴儿早期到儿童后期更清楚地阐明因果推理的发展过程。我们进一步提出,日常语言实践为理论桥接提供了一个很有前景的空间。我们回顾了关于照顾者-儿童对话的选择性工作,特别是关于使用包括因果讨论和教学问题在内的支架语言。将语言实践的研究与这两种认知理论联系起来,我们指出了进一步整合 EBL 和贝叶斯模型的研究方向,并阐明了因果学习是如何在现实生活中展开的。本文属于以下分类:心理学 > 学习、认知生物学 > 认知发展

相似文献

1
Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices.婴儿和幼儿的因果学习:从计算理论到语言实践。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul-Aug;15(4):e1678. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1678. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands.不要因贝叶斯推理而忽视了联想学习:在信息加工需求下进行回溯推理时,儿童的联想能力更强。
Dev Sci. 2024 May;27(3):e13464. doi: 10.1111/desc.13464. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Mechanisms of theory formation in young children.幼儿理论形成的机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.005.
4
Reconstructing constructivism: causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory.重构建构主义:因果模型、贝叶斯学习机制与理论理论。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1085-108. doi: 10.1037/a0028044. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Exploration, Explanation, and Parent-Child Interaction in Museums.博物馆中的探索、解释与亲子互动。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Mar;85(1):7-137. doi: 10.1111/mono.12412.
6
Learning about others and learning from others: Bayesian probabilistic models of intuitive psychology and social learning.从他人处学习和向他人学习:直观心理学和社会学习的贝叶斯概率模型。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2022;63:309-343. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
8
Pretense, counterfactuals, and Bayesian causal models: why what is not real really matters.伪装、反事实与贝叶斯因果模型:为何“非真实”之物至关重要。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep-Oct;37(7):1368-81. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12069. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
9
How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.如何培养思维:统计、结构与抽象。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1279-85. doi: 10.1126/science.1192788.
10
The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: evidence from everyday conversation.儿童因果解释与理论的出现:来自日常对话的证据
Dev Psychol. 2001 Sep;37(5):668-83. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.37.5.668.