Departament de Cognició, Desenvolupament i Psicologia de l'Educació, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedagogía Aplicada y Psicología de la Educación Didáctica y Organización Escolar, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1788-1816. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13032. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
The ability to understand the mental state of others (social cognition), as well as language, is crucial for children to have good social adaptation. Social cognition (SC) has been shown to be a hierarchical model of three factors (Cognitive, intermediate and affective SC) interrelated with linguistic processes. Children on the autism spectrum and children with developmental language disorder (DLD) or social communication disorder (SCD) manifest language and SC difficulties, albeit in different ways.
This systematic review aims to find how language and SC interact with each other and identify linguistic and socio-affective profiles in the target population.
About 1593 articles were systematically reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide in November 2022, obtaining, through inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 38 articles for qualitative assessment. The majority of them were on autism (26) or DLD (14) and to a lesser extent SCD (3).
Although SC is related to all components of language, SC is strongly related to narrative and morphosyntax and partially related to lexicon. Pragmatics shows a complex relation with SC due to greater sensitivity to other factors such as age or task, and prosody appears to be more related to emotional processes. Besides, autistic, SCD and DLD children showed differences in their language and socio-affective performance. Mainstream DLD children have lower performance in general language, where autistic and SCD children have more linguistic variation and are lower in pragmatic and SC tasks, SCD children being more associated with language production difficulties and autistic children with both receptive and productive language.
Each language component has a different interaction with SC. Likewise, different linguistic profiles are partially found for each disorder. These results are important for future lines of research focusing on specific components of interaction and socio-emotional processes, as well as for clinical and educational treatment.
What is already known on the subject The hierarchical model of Schurz et al. (2021), divide social cognition into three brain constructs: cognitive social cognition (CSC), affective social cognition (ASC) and intermediate social cognition (ISC). They observe a large relationship between language and ISC, a fact that has been corroborated with some other studies. Studies have also found lower linguistic and socio-affective abilities in children with autism and language and communication disorders compared with children with neurotypical development, and large behavioural and neurocognitive overlaps between these disorders (Durrleman et al., 2019; Löytömäki et al., 2019). What this paper adds to existing knowledge This is the first review that relates all linguistic components (narrative, lexicon, morphosyntax, pragmatic and prosody) with the three constructs of social cognition (Cognitive, intermediate and affective). Moreover, it is the first review that studies the socio-linguistic factors comparing autism, developmental language disorder and social communication disorder with each other and with neurotypical development in children aged from 4 to 9 years. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Understanding how language and social cognition interact with each other in autism spectrum disorder, developmental language disorder and social communication disorder allows us to trace socio-linguistic profiles for each of the studied disorders, understand better children with these difficulties, and, with this, find specific potential intervention points to improve and prevent these difficulties.
理解他人心理状态(社会认知)的能力以及语言对儿童良好的社会适应至关重要。社会认知(SC)已被证明是一个由三个因素(认知、中间和情感 SC)组成的层级模型,与语言过程相互关联。患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童以及患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)或社交沟通障碍(SCD)的儿童表现出语言和 SC 困难,尽管方式不同。
本系统评价旨在寻找语言和 SC 如何相互作用,并确定目标人群中的语言和社会情感特征。
根据 2022 年 11 月的《系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,系统地回顾了大约 1593 篇文章,通过纳入/排除标准,共获得了 38 篇文章进行定性评估。其中大多数是关于自闭症(26 篇)或 DLD(14 篇),其次是 SCD(3 篇)。
尽管 SC 与语言的所有成分都有关系,但 SC 与叙事和形态句法关系密切,与词汇部分相关,语用学由于年龄或任务等其他因素的敏感性而呈现出复杂的关系,韵律似乎与情感过程关系更密切。此外,自闭症、SCD 和 DLD 儿童在他们的语言和社会情感表现上表现出差异。主流 DLD 儿童在一般语言方面表现较差,而自闭症和 SCD 儿童在语言和 SC 任务中表现出更多的语言变化,SCD 儿童在语言产生困难方面表现更为明显,而自闭症儿童在接受性和产生性语言方面都存在困难。
每个语言成分与 SC 都有不同的相互作用。同样,每个障碍也部分发现了不同的语言特征。这些结果对于未来专注于特定互动和社会情感过程的研究以及临床和教育治疗具有重要意义。
主题已知的内容 Schurz 等人(2021 年)的层级模型将社会认知分为三个大脑结构:认知社会认知(CSC)、情感社会认知(ASC)和中间社会认知(ISC)。他们观察到语言和 ISC 之间存在很大的关系,这一事实已经得到了一些其他研究的证实。研究还发现,与神经典型发育的儿童相比,自闭症儿童和有语言和沟通障碍的儿童在语言和社会情感能力方面较低,并且这些障碍之间存在较大的行为和神经认知重叠(Durrleman 等人,2019 年;Löytömäki 等人,2019 年)。
本文对现有知识的新增内容 这是第一个将所有语言成分(叙事、词汇、形态句法、语用和韵律)与社会认知的三个构念(认知、中间和情感)联系起来的综述。此外,这是第一个研究社会语言因素的综述,将自闭症、发育性语言障碍和社交沟通障碍与神经典型发育的儿童进行比较,并与他们进行比较。
该研究的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?理解语言和社会认知在自闭症谱系障碍、发育性语言障碍和社交沟通障碍中的相互作用,使我们能够为每个研究障碍描绘社会语言特征,更好地了解这些有困难的儿童,并以此找到具体的潜在干预点,以改善和预防这些困难。