• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有明确的证据表明,在听觉意象任务中,自我报告不存在听觉意象的个体与典型的想象者之间存在差异。

No clear evidence of a difference between individuals who self-report an absence of auditory imagery and typical imagers on auditory imagery tasks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0300219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300219. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300219
PMID:38568916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10990234/
Abstract

Aphantasia is characterised by the inability to create mental images in one's mind. Studies investigating impairments in imagery typically focus on the visual domain. However, it is possible to generate many different forms of imagery including imagined auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, motor, taste and other experiences. Recent studies show that individuals with aphantasia report a lack of imagery in modalities, other than vision, including audition. However, to date, no research has examined whether these reductions in self-reported auditory imagery are associated with decrements in tasks that require auditory imagery. Understanding the extent to which visual and auditory imagery deficits co-occur can help to better characterise the core deficits of aphantasia and provide an alternative perspective on theoretical debates on the extent to which imagery draws on modality-specific or modality-general processes. In the current study, individuals that self-identified as being aphantasic and matched control participants with typical imagery performed two tasks: a musical pitch-based imagery and voice-based categorisation task. The majority of participants with aphantasia self-reported significant deficits in both auditory and visual imagery. However, we did not find a concomitant decrease in performance on tasks which require auditory imagery, either in the full sample or only when considering those participants that reported significant deficits in both domains. These findings are discussed in relation to the mechanisms that might obscure observation of imagery deficits in auditory imagery tasks in people that report reduced auditory imagery.

摘要

心像缺失症的特征是无法在脑海中产生心理意象。研究意象损伤的通常集中在视觉领域。然而,人们可以产生许多不同形式的意象,包括想象中的听觉、动觉、触觉、运动、味觉和其他体验。最近的研究表明,心像缺失症患者报告说,除了视觉之外,其他感觉模式(包括听觉)也缺乏意象。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究检查这些自我报告的听觉意象减少是否与需要听觉意象的任务中的缺陷有关。了解视觉和听觉意象缺陷的程度是否共同发生,可以帮助更好地描述心像缺失症的核心缺陷,并为关于意象在多大程度上依赖于特定感觉模式或一般感觉模式的理论争论提供另一种视角。在当前的研究中,自我认定为心像缺失症的个体和具有典型心像的匹配对照组参与者执行了两项任务:基于音乐音高的意象和基于声音的分类任务。大多数心像缺失症患者自我报告在听觉和视觉意象方面都存在明显的缺陷。然而,我们没有发现需要听觉意象的任务的表现有相应的下降,无论是在整个样本中,还是仅在考虑那些报告在两个领域都存在明显缺陷的参与者时。这些发现与可能掩盖在报告听觉意象减少的人进行听觉意象任务中观察到的意象缺陷的机制有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/d3668d773395/pone.0300219.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/50d887aa545b/pone.0300219.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/9f4be5f39d1c/pone.0300219.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/d3668d773395/pone.0300219.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/50d887aa545b/pone.0300219.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/9f4be5f39d1c/pone.0300219.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aacb/10990234/d3668d773395/pone.0300219.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
No clear evidence of a difference between individuals who self-report an absence of auditory imagery and typical imagers on auditory imagery tasks.没有明确的证据表明,在听觉意象任务中,自我报告不存在听觉意象的个体与典型的想象者之间存在差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0300219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300219. eCollection 2024.
2
Multisensory subtypes of aphantasia: Mental imagery as supramodal perception in reverse.幻像缺失的多感觉亚型:作为逆向超感官知觉的心理意象。
Neurosci Res. 2024 Apr;201:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2023.11.009. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.在涉及意象的神经心理学任务中,先天性失像者和具有典型意象者之间只有微小的差异。
Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:180-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception.探究难以想象的领域:空想缺失对视觉表象和视觉感知不同领域的影响。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Revisiting the blind mind: Still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia.重新审视盲视的心灵:个体的空想视觉中仍没有感觉视觉意象的证据。
Neurosci Res. 2024 Apr;201:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Visual working memory in aphantasia: Retained accuracy and capacity with a different strategy.想象缺失个体的视觉工作记忆:使用不同策略保持准确性和容量。
Cortex. 2021 Oct;143:237-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
7
Defining and 'diagnosing' aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?定义和“诊断”想象缺失症:病症还是个体差异?
Cortex. 2023 Dec;169:220-234. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.通过绘图对想象缺失症进行量化:那些没有视觉意象的人在物体记忆方面存在缺陷,但在空间记忆方面没有。
Cortex. 2021 Feb;135:159-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Assessing aphantasia prevalence and the relation of self-reported imagery abilities and memory task performance.评估心盲症的患病率以及自我报告的意象能力与记忆任务表现之间的关系。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Aug;113:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103548. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
10
The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia.盲视思维:空想者中不存在感官视觉意象。
Cortex. 2018 Aug;105:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"The Giant Black Elephant with white Tusks stood in a field of Green Grass": Cognitive and brain mechanisms underlying aphantasia.“长着白色象牙的巨型黑象站在一片绿草如茵的田野里”:心盲症背后的认知与大脑机制。
Conscious Cogn. 2025 Jan;127:103790. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103790. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development.无想象能力的系统综述:概念、测量、神经基础及理论发展
Vision (Basel). 2024 Sep 22;8(3):56. doi: 10.3390/vision8030056.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia.视觉意象在人脸识别和面部合成构建中的作用。来自空想症的证据。
Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:318-334. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception.探究难以想象的领域:空想缺失对视觉表象和视觉感知不同领域的影响。
Cortex. 2023 Sep;166:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces.
没有发现脸盲症在空想症患者中更普遍:视觉识别缺陷很小,且不限于面部。
Perception. 2023 Sep;52(9):629-644. doi: 10.1177/03010066231180712. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination.主观信号强度将现实与想象区分开来。
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 23;14(1):1627. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1.
5
Memories with a blind mind: Remembering the past and imagining the future with aphantasia.盲视记忆:运用空想记忆法回忆过去和想象未来。
Cognition. 2022 Oct;227:105192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105192. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Proposal for a consistent definition of aphantasia and hyperphantasia: A response to Lambert and Sibley (2022) and Simner and Dance (2022).关于心盲症和超心象症统一定义的提议:对兰伯特和西布利(2022年)以及西姆纳和丹斯(2022年)的回应
Cortex. 2022 Jul;152:74-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
On the importance of consistent terminology for describing sensory imagery and its absence: A response to Monzel et al. (2022).论描述感觉意象及其缺失时术语一致性的重要性:对蒙泽尔等人(2022年)的回应。
Cortex. 2022 Jul;152:153-156. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength.瞳孔光反应作为心像缺失、感觉和现象意象强度的生理指标。
Elife. 2022 Mar 31;11:e72484. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72484.
9
Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery.在涉及意象的神经心理学任务中,先天性失像者和具有典型意象者之间只有微小的差异。
Cortex. 2022 Mar;148:180-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.010. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
The prevalence of aphantasia (imagery weakness) in the general population.一般人群中想象缺失(意象缺失)的流行率。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Jan;97:103243. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103243. Epub 2021 Dec 3.