Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2024 May;143:105052. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105052. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Global economic and health shocks, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic typically impact healthcare financing and delivery. Cutler found that profound societal changes in the 20th century induced three waves of healthcare reform across seven major OECD countries. Our study investigates whether major crises in the 21st century induced similar reform waves. Through thematic analysis, we systematically compared health system changes in response to these shocks, using data from the Observatory on Health Systems and Policies and the OECD. Our analysis reveals similar overarching reform trends across countries in response to the 2008 economic crisis: a tendency toward re-centralization of health system governance to control and leverage the efficient rationalization of public health resources. This, to some extent, countered the effects of the market-based reforms of the previous wave. The reforms induced by the 2008 crisis were mediated by its repercussions on the countries' economies. In contrast, reforms in response to the pandemic aimed primarily to address the direct impact of the shock on the health system. Despite its negative economic impact, the pandemic resulted in a substantial but temporary increase in public health spending. A better understanding reform dynamics and their impact on overarching conflicting health system objectives may prevent unintended consequences and enhance health systems' resilience in response to future shocks.
全球经济和卫生冲击,如 2008 年全球金融危机和 COVID-19 大流行,通常会影响医疗保健的融资和提供。Cutler 发现,20 世纪深刻的社会变革在七个主要经合组织国家引发了三波医疗改革浪潮。我们的研究调查了 21 世纪的重大危机是否引发了类似的改革浪潮。通过主题分析,我们使用来自卫生系统和政策观察站和经合组织的数据,系统地比较了应对这些冲击的卫生系统变化。我们的分析揭示了各国对 2008 年经济危机的反应中存在类似的总体改革趋势:倾向于重新集中卫生系统治理,以控制和利用公共卫生资源的有效合理化。这在一定程度上抵消了上一波基于市场的改革的影响。2008 年危机引发的改革受到其对各国经济影响的调节。相比之下,为应对大流行而进行的改革主要旨在解决该冲击对卫生系统的直接影响。尽管大流行对经济产生了负面影响,但它导致公共卫生支出大幅增加,但只是暂时的。更好地了解改革动态及其对总体冲突的卫生系统目标的影响,可以防止意外后果,并增强卫生系统对未来冲击的弹性。