Šteinbuka Inna, Austers Aldis, Barānovs Oļegs, Malnačs Normunds
Productivity Research Institute, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
European Policy Research Institute, Latvian Academy of Sciences, Riga, Latvia.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;10:866639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.866639. eCollection 2022.
The decision of EU and the response of the national governments to COVID-19 crisis provide the basis for returning "back to normal". A key challenge is the transition to economic recovery in the presence of the ongoing COVID-19 risk. Adequate policy mix and forward-looking actions of the public institutions are crucial to mitigate the devastating impact of the crisis and to preserve growth. Governments need to facilitate positive changes in the labor market, adjust the macroeconomic and fiscal regimes, and mitigate the post-crisis "fatigue" of societies. The turmoil of the EU economy is symmetrical, as the pandemic has affected all EU Member States, but the impact of the pandemic varies considerably from one country to another, as does their ability to absorb the economic crisis. Also, variation in the vaccination performance is partly due to different institutional characteristics across countries. Small countries are more vulnerable to external economic shocks; however, they can increase their resilience by efficient governance and social response. Extraordinary pandemic crisis can be seen as a stress test for the small and open Latvian economy, and it is worth analyzing the lessons that Latvia had learned and its future prospects. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the economic and social consequences of the ongoing crisis in Latvia, assess the effectiveness of the response of the government to the crisis, analyse people's perceptions, and to identify the future scenarios. The authors applied a special theoretical framework for the assessment of the effectiveness of institutions. Institutional analysis of crises response by the Latvian government reveals that the government managed to avoid serious functional disruptions; however, it failed to show convincing ability to learn by doing. The authors also provide a comprehensive analysis of the macroeconomic trends of the "COVID-sick" Latvian economy and conclude that future-oriented solutions relate to international competitiveness and that the key factor of competitiveness is a productivity renaissance. The pandemic crisis has fostered the state support for healthcare, which in Latvia for decades has been underfinanced. The right choice of fiscal instruments is crucial to accelerate the economic recovery and better healthcare. Research is based on the macroeconomic assessment and survey-based analysis. The comparison of statistically justified findings with the public perception helps formulate conclusions on the future scenarios and policies.
欧盟的决策以及各国政府对新冠疫情危机的应对措施为回归“正常状态”奠定了基础。一个关键挑战是在新冠疫情风险持续存在的情况下向经济复苏过渡。公共机构采取适当的政策组合和前瞻性行动对于减轻危机的破坏性影响以及维持经济增长至关重要。各国政府需要推动劳动力市场的积极变革,调整宏观经济和财政制度,并缓解社会在危机后的“疲态”。欧盟经济的动荡是对称的,因为疫情影响了所有欧盟成员国,但疫情的影响在不同国家之间差异很大,它们吸收经济危机的能力也是如此。此外,疫苗接种成效的差异部分归因于各国不同的制度特征。小国更容易受到外部经济冲击;然而,它们可以通过有效的治理和社会应对来增强自身的复原力。这场非同寻常的疫情危机可被视为对拉脱维亚小型开放型经济的一次压力测试,分析拉脱维亚吸取的教训及其未来前景是很有价值的。本文旨在评估拉脱维亚当前危机的经济和社会后果,评估政府应对危机的成效,分析民众的看法,并确定未来的情景。作者运用了一个特殊的理论框架来评估机构的成效。对拉脱维亚政府应对危机的制度分析表明,政府成功避免了严重的功能紊乱;然而,它未能展现出令人信服的边干边学的能力。作者还对“受新冠疫情影响的”拉脱维亚经济的宏观经济趋势进行了全面分析,并得出结论,面向未来的解决方案与国际竞争力相关,而竞争力的关键因素是生产力复兴。疫情危机促使国家加大了对医疗保健的支持,而在拉脱维亚,几十年来医疗保健资金一直不足。正确选择财政手段对于加速经济复苏和改善医疗保健至关重要。研究基于宏观经济评估和基于调查的分析。将经统计验证的结果与公众认知进行比较,有助于就未来情景和政策得出结论。