Charité Center for Global Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ärzte für Madagaskar, Berlin, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):e081482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081482.
There is a substantial lack of inter-facility referral systems for emergency obstetrical and neonatal care in rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa. Data on the costs and cost-effectiveness of such systems that reduce preventable maternal and neonatal deaths are scarce.
We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of a non-governmental organisation (NGO)-run inter-facility referral system for emergency obstetrical and neonatal care in rural Southern Madagascar by analysing the characteristics of cases referred through the intervention as well as its costs.
We used secondary NGO data, drawn from an NGO's monitoring and financial administration database, including medical and financial records.
We performed a descriptive and a cost-effectiveness analysis, including a one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis.
1172 cases were referred over a period of 4 years. The most common referral reasons were obstructed labour, ineffective labour and eclampsia. In total, 48 neonates were referred through the referral system over the study period. Estimated cost per referral was US$336 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was US$70 per additional life-year saved (undiscounted, discounted US$137). The sensitivity analysis showed that the intervention was cost-effective for all scenarios with the lowest ICER at US$99 and the highest ICER at US$205 per additional life-year saved. When extrapolated to the population living in the study area, the investment costs of the programme were US$0.13 per person and annual running costs US$0.06 per person.
In our study, the inter-facility referral system was a very cost-effective intervention. Our findings may inform policies, decision-making and implementation strategies for emergency obstetrical and neonatal care referral systems in similar resource-constrained settings.
撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区缺乏紧急产科和新生儿保健机构间转诊系统。关于此类系统(可降低可预防的孕产妇和新生儿死亡)的成本和成本效益的数据很少。
我们旨在通过分析通过干预措施转诊的病例的特征及其成本,确定非政府组织(NGO)运营的农村马达加斯加南部紧急产科和新生儿保健机构间转诊系统的成本效益。
我们使用了 NGO 的二级数据,这些数据来自 NGO 的监测和财务管理数据库,包括医疗和财务记录。
在 4 年期间,共转诊了 1172 例病例。最常见的转诊原因是产程梗阻、无效劳动和子痫。在此期间,共有 48 例新生儿通过转诊系统转诊。估计每次转诊的费用为 336 美元,增量成本效益比(ICER)为每挽救一个额外生命年 70 美元(未贴现,贴现后为 137 美元)。敏感性分析表明,该干预措施在所有情况下均具有成本效益,最低 ICER 为 99 美元,最高 ICER 为每挽救一个额外生命年 205 美元。当外推到研究区域内的人口时,该计划的投资成本为每人 0.13 美元,年运营成本为每人 0.06 美元。
在我们的研究中,机构间转诊系统是一种非常具有成本效益的干预措施。我们的研究结果可能为类似资源有限环境中的紧急产科和新生儿保健转诊系统的政策、决策和实施策略提供信息。