Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 13;21(9):e1004461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004461. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency. While PPH-related deaths are relatively rare in high-resource settings, PPH continues to be the leading cause of maternal mortality in limited-resource settings. We undertook a systematic review to identify, assess, and synthesise cost-effectiveness evidence on postpartum interventions to prevent, diagnose, or treat PPH.
This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023438424). We searched Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), EconLit, CINAHL, Emcare, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus between 22 June 2023 and 11 July 2024 with no date or language limitations. Full economic evaluations of any postpartum intervention for prevention, detection, or management of PPH were eligible. Study screening, data extraction, and quality assessments (using the CHEC-E tool) were undertaken independently by at least 2 reviewers. We developed narrative syntheses of available evidence for each intervention. From 3,993 citations, 56 studies were included: 33 studies of preventative interventions, 1 study assessed a diagnostic method, 17 studies of treatment interventions, 1 study comparing prevention and treatment, and 4 studies assessed care bundles. Twenty-four studies were conducted in high-income countries, 22 in upper or lower middle-income countries, 3 in low-income countries, and 7 studies involved countries of multiple income levels. Study settings, methods, and findings varied considerably. Interventions with the most consistent findings were the use of tranexamic acid for PPH treatment and using care bundles. In both cases, multiple studies predicted these interventions would either result in better health outcomes and cost savings, or better health outcomes at acceptable costs. Limitations for this review include that no ideal setting was chosen, and therefore, a transferability assessment was not undertaken. In addition, some sources of study uncertainty, such as effectiveness parameters, were interrogated to a greater degree than other sources of uncertainty.
In this systematic review, we extracted, critically appraised, and summarised the cost-effectiveness evidence from 56 studies across 16 different interventions for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PPH. Both the use of tranexamic acid as part of PPH treatment, and the use of comprehensive PPH bundles for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment have supportive cost-effectiveness evidence across a range of settings. More studies utilizing best practice principles are required to make stronger conclusions on which interventions provide the best value. Several high-priority interventions recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) such as administering additional uterotonics, non-pneumatic anti-shock garment, or uterine balloon tamponade (UBT) for PPH management require robust economic evaluations across high-, middle-, and low-resource settings.
产后出血(PPH)是一种产科急症。虽然在高资源环境中,与 PPH 相关的死亡相对较少,但 PPH 仍然是资源有限环境中产妇死亡的主要原因。我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定、评估和综合产后干预措施预防、诊断或治疗 PPH 的成本效益证据。
本系统评价前瞻性地在 PROSPERO(CRD42023438424)上注册。我们于 2023 年 6 月 22 日至 2024 年 7 月 11 日在 Medline、Embase、NHS 经济评估数据库(NHS EED)、EconLit、CINAHL、Emcare、Web of Science 和全球医学索引之间进行了无日期或语言限制的搜索。任何预防、检测或管理 PPH 的产后干预措施的全经济评估都符合条件。研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估(使用 CHEC-E 工具)由至少 2 名评审员独立进行。我们为每项干预措施的现有证据进行了叙述性综合。从 3993 条引文,纳入了 56 项研究:33 项预防干预研究,1 项研究评估了诊断方法,17 项治疗干预研究,1 项预防和治疗比较研究,4 项护理包评估研究。24 项研究在高收入国家进行,22 项在中上收入或中下收入国家进行,3 项在低收入国家进行,7 项研究涉及多个收入水平的国家。研究环境、方法和发现差异很大。最一致的发现是氨甲环酸用于 PPH 治疗和使用护理包。在这两种情况下,多项研究预测这些干预措施将要么改善健康结果并节省成本,要么以可接受的成本获得更好的健康结果。本综述的局限性包括未选择理想的环境,因此未进行可转移性评估。此外,对一些来源的研究不确定性,如有效性参数,进行了比其他来源的不确定性更深入的探讨。
在这项系统评价中,我们从 16 种不同的干预措施中提取、批判性评价并总结了 56 项关于预防、诊断和治疗 PPH 的成本效益证据。氨甲环酸作为 PPH 治疗的一部分的使用,以及综合 PPH 护理包用于预防、诊断和治疗,在一系列环境中都有支持性的成本效益证据。需要更多利用最佳实践原则的研究来对哪些干预措施提供最佳价值做出更强有力的结论。世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的一些高优先级干预措施,如在 PPH 管理中给予额外的宫缩剂、非充气抗休克衣或子宫球囊压迫(UBT),需要在高、中、低资源环境中进行稳健的经济评估。