School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 20;12:1334583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334583. eCollection 2024.
Determining the optimal number of emergency medical suppliers for the government to contract with in the context of public health events poses a challenging problem. Having too many suppliers can result in increased costs, while having too few suppliers can potentially expose the government to supply risks. Striking the right balance between these two factors is crucial in ensuring efficient and reliable emergency response and management. This study examines the process of determining the appropriate number of suppliers in emergency medical supply chain. By incorporating option contracts and employing the total cost of government procurement as the objective function, the analysis focuses on the impact of relevant parameters on the optimal number of suppliers. Furthermore, the study investigates the optimal supplier quantities under different types of option contracts. The proposed decision model for determining the optimal number of suppliers in this paper considers three key factors: the supply risk associated with emergency medical supplies, the reserve cost of government procurement, and the responsiveness of emergency medical supplies. Additionally, a method is introduced for selecting the quantity of emergency medical suppliers based on flexible contracts. This approach offers a scientific foundation for the government to effectively address the challenge of supplier quantity selection when faced with risks related to shortages, expiration, and the combination of both.
确定政府在公共卫生事件背景下与多少家紧急医疗供应商签订合同的最佳数量是一个具有挑战性的问题。供应商过多会导致成本增加,而供应商过少则可能使政府面临供应风险。在这两个因素之间取得正确的平衡对于确保高效可靠的应急响应和管理至关重要。本研究探讨了在紧急医疗供应链中确定适当供应商数量的过程。通过引入期权合同,并将政府采购总成本作为目标函数,分析侧重于相关参数对最佳供应商数量的影响。此外,研究还探讨了不同类型期权合同下的最优供应商数量。本文提出的确定最佳供应商数量的决策模型考虑了三个关键因素:与紧急医疗用品相关的供应风险、政府采购的储备成本以及紧急医疗用品的响应能力。此外,还介绍了一种基于灵活合同选择紧急医疗供应商数量的方法。该方法为政府提供了科学依据,使其能够在面临短缺、过期以及两者结合相关风险时,有效地解决供应商数量选择的挑战。