• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FAP 供应链中的契约选择与预售策略。

Contract choice and advance selling strategy in a supply chain of FAP.

机构信息

College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, PR China.

Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Change Management, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, PR China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265661. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265661
PMID:35324980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8947360/
Abstract

The advance selling (AS) has been widely applied in fresh industry for it can elevating the customer experience and increase flexibility thus profit for a retailer. However, the introduction of the AS will have an impact on spot market in pricing strategy, market share and the profit of the retailer. Hence, to coordinate the supply chain and improve the efficiency of the agricultural supply chain, a two-stage game theory model is constructed to analyze the effects of AS on three classic contracts: wholesale price, quantity discount and revenue-sharing contract. This paper also discusses the boundary conditions of whether a retailer should sell in advance. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: First, revenue-sharing contracts are superior to wholesale price and quantity discount contracts when retailers sell in advance, the wholesale price contract can perform better than the quantity discount contract in the presence of AS if the contract parameter is properly set. Second, a revenue-sharing contract that normally coordinates the supply chain can performs poorly when the retailer sells in advance that the social welfare would be higher if using a quantity discount contract instead. These conclusions have important implications for suppliers when retailers sell in advance. Such suppliers need to design appropriate contracts to distribute FAP that carefully take into consideration the AS activities in the market.

摘要

预售已广泛应用于新鲜产业,因为它可以提升顾客体验、增加零售商的灵活性和利润。然而,预售的引入将对现货市场的定价策略、市场份额和零售商的利润产生影响。因此,为了协调供应链并提高农业供应链的效率,构建了一个两阶段博弈论模型来分析预售对三种经典合同的影响:批发价、数量折扣和收益共享合同。本文还讨论了零售商是否应该预售的边界条件。本文的结论如下:第一,零售商预售时,收益共享合同优于批发价和数量折扣合同,如果合同参数设置得当,批发价合同在有预售时的表现要好于数量折扣合同。第二,零售商预售时通常协调供应链的收益共享合同表现不佳,如果采用数量折扣合同,社会福利会更高。这些结论对零售商预售时的供应商具有重要意义。这些供应商在设计 FAP 分配的合同时,需要考虑市场中的预售活动,谨慎地考虑这些活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/ca38584f226d/pone.0265661.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/f9f02253753d/pone.0265661.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/5bc0fe660e15/pone.0265661.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/e056185c70f8/pone.0265661.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/ab97d0a4c183/pone.0265661.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/9bdee1107d5b/pone.0265661.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/39d47b14b0d5/pone.0265661.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/ca38584f226d/pone.0265661.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/f9f02253753d/pone.0265661.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/5bc0fe660e15/pone.0265661.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/e056185c70f8/pone.0265661.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/ab97d0a4c183/pone.0265661.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/9bdee1107d5b/pone.0265661.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/39d47b14b0d5/pone.0265661.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47e1/8947360/ca38584f226d/pone.0265661.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Contract choice and advance selling strategy in a supply chain of FAP.FAP 供应链中的契约选择与预售策略。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265661. eCollection 2022.
2
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
3
Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract.供应链中具有定价和服务决策的零售商 Stackelberg 博弈与简单价格折扣契约
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195109. eCollection 2018.
4
Optimal control of carbon emission reduction strategies in supply chain with wholesale price and consignment contract.供应链中批发价格和寄售合同下的碳减排策略的最优控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61707-61722. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15080-1. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Research on supply chain performance based on retailers' fairness concerns: Wholesale prices versus cost sharing of efforts.基于零售商公平关切的供应链绩效研究:批发价格与努力成本分担。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0204482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204482. eCollection 2018.
6
A game-theoretic approach for pricing in a closed-loop supply chain considering product exchange program and a full-refund return policy: a case study of Iran.考虑产品交换计划和全额退款退货政策的闭环供应链中的定价博弈论方法:伊朗案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10390-10413. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22671-z. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation.消费者环境意识和总量管制与交易制度下的三级供应链的碳排放减排合作。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(54):82411-82438. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20190-5. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Coordinating a three-level contract farming supply chain with option contracts considering risk-averse farmer and retailer.考虑风险厌恶型农户和零售商的三级期权契约型合同农业供应链协调
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0279115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279115. eCollection 2023.
9
Green supply chain game model and contract design: risk neutrality vs. risk aversion.绿色供应链博弈模型与契约设计:风险中性与风险规避
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51871-51891. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18804-z. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Research the effect of anticipated regret and fairness concerns on retailer-led supply chain.研究预期后悔和公平关切对零售商主导供应链的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0279334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279334. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal trade-in strategy for advance selling with strategic consumers proportion.考虑战略消费者比例的预售最优以旧换新策略
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0273124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273124. eCollection 2023.
2
Optimization and selection of cause marketing mode with the warm glow effect.带有温暖光辉效应的公益营销模式的优化与选择。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0272724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272724. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Coordination of a fresh agricultural product supply chain with option contract under cost and loss disruptions.考虑成本和损耗干扰下的带期权合同的新鲜农产品供应链协调。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252960. eCollection 2021.
2
Analysis on the stability and evolutionary trend of the symbiosis system in the supply chain of fresh agricultural products.分析生鲜农产品供应链共生系统的稳定性及演化趋势。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236334. eCollection 2020.
3
Social and natural risk factor correlation in China's fresh agricultural product supply.
中国新鲜农产品供应中的社会和自然风险因素相关性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 2;15(6):e0232836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232836. eCollection 2020.