Suppr超能文献

TactiFlex SE 激光切割灌流冷盐水消融导管的最佳消融参数:与 ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow 多孔灌流冷盐水消融导管的比较。

Optimal ablation settings of TactiFlex SE laser-cut irrigated-tip catheter: comparison with ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow porous irrigated-tip catheter.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;67(8):1755-1769. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01797-9. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The TactiFlex SE catheter (TFSE, Abbott) with a contact force (CF) sensor and a laser-cut irrigated-tip has recently become available but lacks a lesion quality marker. This study aimed to explore distinctions in lesion characteristics between the TFSE and the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter (STSF, Biosense Webster), which utilizes a porous irrigated tip, and to assess the most effective application settings for the TFSE.

METHODS

Lesions were generated using varying settings of radiofrequency power (30-50 W), CF (10-20 g), application duration (10-40 s), and catheter orientation (perpendicular or parallel) in an ex vivo porcine model. Comparative analysis between the TFSE and STSF was conducted for lesion characteristics and incidence of steam pops using predictive models in regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 720 applications, the TFSE exhibited a significantly lower incidence of steam pops compared to the STSF (0.6% vs. 36.8%, P < 0.001). Moreover, coefficients of determination (R) for the TFSE were higher than those for the STSF concerning lesion depth (0.710 vs. 0.541) and volume (0.723 vs. 0.618). The lesion size generated with the TFSE was notably smaller than that with the STSF under identical application settings. Additionally, to achieve a lesion depth ≥ 4.0 mm, the TFSE required an application duration 8-12 s longer than the STSF under similar settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The TFSE demonstrated a lower incidence of steam pops and superior predictability in lesion size compared to the STSF. However, the TFSE necessitated a longer application duration than the STSF to achieve an adequate lesion size.

摘要

背景

TactiFlex SE 导管(TFSE,雅培)带有接触力(CF)传感器和激光切割的灌洗尖端,最近已经上市,但缺乏病变质量标记。本研究旨在探讨 TFSE 与 ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow 导管(STSF,Biosense Webster)之间病变特征的差异,后者利用多孔灌洗尖端,并评估 TFSE 的最有效应用设置。

方法

在离体猪模型中,使用不同的射频功率(30-50 W)、CF(10-20 g)、应用时间(10-40 s)和导管方向(垂直或平行)设置生成病变。使用回归分析中的预测模型对 TFSE 和 STSF 的病变特征和蒸汽 pop 发生率进行比较分析。

结果

在 720 次应用中,TFSE 的蒸汽 pop 发生率明显低于 STSF(0.6% vs. 36.8%,P<0.001)。此外,TFSE 的决定系数(R)在病变深度(0.710 比 0.541)和体积(0.723 比 0.618)方面均高于 STSF。在相同的应用设置下,TFSE 生成的病变尺寸明显小于 STSF。此外,为了达到深度≥4.0mm 的病变,TFSE 在相似的设置下需要比 STSF 长 8-12 秒的应用时间。

结论

与 STSF 相比,TFSE 的蒸汽 pop 发生率较低,病变尺寸的可预测性更高。然而,TFSE 比 STSF 更需要更长的应用时间来达到足够的病变尺寸。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验