De Stefano Adriana Assunta, Valentini Leda Miriam, Musone Ludovica, Horodynski Martina, Macrì Monica, Galluccio Gabriella
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, Università degli Studi "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 25;14(17):5990. doi: 10.3390/jcm14175990.
This study aims to explore the relationship between mandibular asymmetry (MA), generalized joint hypermobility (GJH), and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in pre-orthodontic growing individuals. This cross-sectional study included 74 pre-orthodontic individuals aged 8-16 years. Mandibular asymmetry was evaluated through posteroanterior cephalometric analysis, using menton deviation ≥ 4 mm as the threshold for asymmetry. GJH was assessed using the Beighton Score (BS ≥ 4 = GJH-positive), while TMD was diagnosed based on Axis I of the DC/TMD. Associations among the variables were tested using a chi-square test ( < 0.05; SPSS v.24). The study included 74 patients (25.7% males; mean age 12.7 ± 2.16 years). The GJH-positive group ( = 41) showed a higher prevalence of TMD (85.4%) compared to the GJH-negative group (51.5%) ( = 0.002). MA was more frequent in the GJH-positive group (68.3% vs. 45.5%; = 0.041). A significant association was also found between TMD and MA (71.2% vs. 27.3%; < 0.001). In both groups, patients with TMD were more likely to present MA (GJH-negative = 0.022; GJH-positive = 0.046). MA emerged as a key factor associated with the presence of TMD, particularly when combined with GHJ. These findings indicate that MA alone is significantly related to the occurrence of TMD, regardless of joint hypermobility status. However, the risk appears to be amplified in individuals who also present with GJH. Effect size analysis indicated that most associations were small, with only the one between TMD and MA reaching a moderate level. This highlights the importance of evaluating statistical significance in the context of effect size to better assess clinical relevance.
本研究旨在探讨正畸治疗前生长发育期个体的下颌不对称(MA)、全身关节活动过度(GJH)与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)之间的关系。这项横断面研究纳入了74名年龄在8至16岁的正畸治疗前个体。通过后前位头影测量分析评估下颌不对称,以颏点偏移≥4 mm作为不对称的阈值。使用贝ighton评分(BS≥4 = GJH阳性)评估GJH,而TMD则根据DC/TMD的轴I进行诊断。使用卡方检验(<0.05;SPSS v.24)检验变量之间的关联。该研究包括74名患者(25.7%为男性;平均年龄12.7±2.16岁)。与GJH阴性组(51.5%)相比,GJH阳性组(=41)的TMD患病率更高(85.4%)(=0.002)。GJH阳性组中MA更为常见(68.3%对45.5%;=0.041)。还发现TMD与MA之间存在显著关联(71.2%对27.3%;<0.001)。在两组中,患有TMD的患者更有可能出现MA(GJH阴性组=0.022;GJH阳性组=0.046)。MA成为与TMD存在相关的关键因素,特别是与GHJ同时出现时。这些发现表明,无论关节活动过度状态如何,单独的MA与TMD的发生显著相关。然而,在同时存在GJH的个体中,风险似乎会增加。效应量分析表明,大多数关联较小,只有TMD与MA之间的关联达到中等水平。这凸显了在效应量背景下评估统计显著性以更好地评估临床相关性的重要性。