Suppr超能文献

翻译、跨文化调适及验证 10 项脊柱功能指数(SFI-10)在巴西有肌肉骨骼脊柱疾病患者中的应用。

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the 10-item spine functional index (SFI-10) in the Brazilians with musculoskeletal spine disorders.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 5;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07406-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Spine Functional Index (SFI) into Brazilian Portuguese (SFI-Br) in individuals with musculoskeletal spine disorders.

METHODS

Participants (n=194) answered the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for General Pain (RMDQ-g), and SFI-25 incorporating the SFI-10. Structural validity, from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), used comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and chi-square/degrees of freedom (DF). The best structure was considered from the lower values of the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Construct and criterion validity used Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho). Internal consistency used Cronbach's alpha, reliability used intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with ceiling and floor effects determined. Error used the standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change, 90% level (MDC).

RESULTS

Adequate fit indices demonstrated an unequivocal one-factor structure only for the SFI-10 (chi-square/DF <3.00, CFI and TLI >0.90, RMSEA <0.08). The SFI-10-Br correlation was high with the SFI-Br (rho=0.914, p<0.001), moderate for the RMDQ-g (rho=-0.78), SF-36 functional capacity domain (rho=0.718) and NPRS (rho=-0.526); and adequate for the remaining SF-36 domains (rho>0.30). Test-retest reliability (ICC=0.826) and internal consistency (alpha=0.864) were high. No ceiling or floor effects were observed, and error was satisfactory (SEM=9.08%, MDC=25.15%).

CONCLUSION

The SFI Brazilian version was successfully produced with the 10-item version showing an unequivocal one-factor structure, high construct and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and satisfactory error. Further research on responsiveness is required.

摘要

目的

将脊柱功能指数(SFI)翻译并跨文化适应为巴西葡萄牙语(SFI-Br),用于患有肌肉骨骼脊柱疾病的个体。

方法

参与者(n=194)回答数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、36 项简短健康调查(SF-36)、罗兰-莫里斯一般疼痛残疾问卷(RMDQ-g)和 SFI-25,其中包含 SFI-10。结构效度通过验证性因素分析(CFA),采用比较拟合指数(CFI)、塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)和卡方/自由度(DF)进行评估。从较低的 Akaike 信息准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)值中选择最佳结构。结构和标准效度采用斯皮尔曼相关系数(rho)进行评估。内部一致性采用克朗巴赫的 alpha,可靠性采用组内相关系数(ICC),确定天花板和地板效应。误差采用测量的标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化,90%水平(MDC)。

结果

仅 SFI-10 表现出明确的单因素结构,具有良好的拟合指数(卡方/DF<3.00,CFI 和 TLI>0.90,RMSEA<0.08)。SFI-10-Br 与 SFI-Br 高度相关(rho=0.914,p<0.001),与 RMDQ-g(rho=-0.78)、SF-36 功能能力域(rho=0.718)和 NPRS(rho=-0.526)中度相关;与其余 SF-36 域相关性良好(rho>0.30)。测试-重测可靠性(ICC=0.826)和内部一致性(alpha=0.864)较高。未观察到天花板或地板效应,误差令人满意(SEM=9.08%,MDC=25.15%)。

结论

成功生成了 SFI 巴西版本,其中 10 项版本表现出明确的单因素结构,具有较高的结构和标准效度、可靠性、内部一致性和令人满意的误差。需要进一步研究其反应度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/10996142/0f040866157b/12891_2024_7406_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验