Suppr超能文献

慢性颈痛患者使用巴西版哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表的测量性能。

Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.

Rede Sarah de Hospitais de Reabilitação, São Luís, MA, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2022 Feb;31(2):346-352. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07070-1. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS) in patients with chronic neck pain.

METHODS

One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The structural validity of the CNFDS was assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with the following fit indices: chi-square divided by degrees of freedom (chi-square/df), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). To test the construct validity, the CNFDS score was correlated with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, the Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, and Neck Disability Index (NDI). A subsample of 43 patients filled the CNFDS at two different times, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC). The internal consistency of the CNFDS was analyzed by Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

CNFDS presented a unidimensional structure, with goodness of fit indices: chi-square/df = 1.37, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.059. The CNFDS showed satisfactory results of reliability (ICC = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84). The SEM was 1.72 and the MDC was 4.76. The CNFDS showed a high correlation with the NDI (rho = 0.718) and a low correlation with the other instruments. There were no floor and ceiling effects.

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian version of the CNFDS with a one-dimensional structure and 15 items has adequate measurement properties.

摘要

目的

评估慢性颈痛患者使用巴西版哥本哈根颈部功能障碍量表(CNFDS)的测量性能。

方法

本研究纳入了 105 名患者。通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估 CNFDS 的结构效度,使用以下拟合指数:卡方自由度比(chi-square/df)、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)。为了检验结构效度,将 CNFDS 评分与数字疼痛评分、坦帕运动恐惧量表、疼痛相关灾难化思维量表和颈部残疾指数(NDI)进行相关性分析。43 名患者的子样本在两个不同时间填写 CNFDS,使用组内相关系数(ICC)、测量误差标准(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)来测量测试-重测信度。使用 Cronbach's alpha 分析 CNFDS 的内部一致性。

结果

CNFDS 呈现出单维结构,拟合度指数良好:chi-square/df = 1.37,CFI = 0.94,TLI = 0.93,RMSEA = 0.059。CNFDS 具有令人满意的可靠性(ICC = 0.93)和内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.84)结果。SEM 为 1.72,MDC 为 4.76。CNFDS 与 NDI 高度相关(rho = 0.718),与其他工具低度相关。没有地板效应和天花板效应。

结论

具有一维结构和 15 个项目的巴西版 CNFDS 具有良好的测量性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验