da Silva Trandafilov Alessandra Aparecida, Grazziotin-Soares Renata, Nogueira Amanda Palmeira Arruda, Maia-Filho Etevaldo Matos, Ferreira Meire Coelho, de Jesus Tavarez Rudys Rodolfo, Bauer José, Carvalho Ceci Nunes
School of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
Iran Endod J. 2024;19(2):112-119. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i2.43108.
The final step of irrigation has been considered to of increase the bonding strength of filling material to dentin. This study investigated the impact of three final-step irrigation methods on the endodontic sealer bond strength to dentin by using a micro push-out test.
Palatal roots of human maxillary molars were cleaned and shaped and randomly divided in six groups (n=15) according to the final-step irrigation method and the type of root canal sealer used. The solutions used for the final-step irrigation were 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, which underwent three methods: 1) syringe-needle irrigation/conventional, 2) passive ultrasonic irrigation, and 3) XP-endo Finisher agitation. The root canal sealers used were: EndoSequence BC Sealer, and AH-Plus sealer. Roots were obturated with the single cone technique and then, cross-sectioned in 2-mm-thick slices (3 slices from each root). Push-out test was performed on the sliced specimens (cervical, middle, and apical thirds) with a universal testing machine. Bond strength values were recorded in megapascal (MPa). Subsequently, each specimen was longitudinally split to verify the type of failure. Data analysis was performed using Johnson transformation, three-way analysis of variance, Tukey's post-hoc tests, and the partial Eta squared test.
There were significant differences in bond strength between the sealers [AH: 4.46±2.24 and BC: 3.47±2.19 MPa (<0.001)]; between final-step irrigation methods [passive ultrasonic irrigation: 4.52±2.25, XP-endo Finisher: 3.93±3.93 and syringe-needle irrigation/conventional: 3.37±2.51 MPa (<0.001)], and between the root canal thirds represented by the sliced specimens [cervical: 5.45±2.39, middle: 4.14±1.99 and apical: 2.30±1.30 MPa (<0.001)]. The interaction between the variables had no significance (>0.05).
Agitation of the final irrigating solution may improve the bonding of the sealer to canal walls. AH-Plus sealer had the highest bond strength. The bond strength reduced significantly towards the apical third.
冲洗的最后一步被认为可提高充填材料与牙本质的粘结强度。本研究通过微推出试验,调查了三种最后一步冲洗方法对根管封闭剂与牙本质粘结强度的影响。
将人类上颌磨牙的腭根进行清理和预备,根据最后一步冲洗方法和所用根管封闭剂的类型随机分为六组(n = 15)。用于最后一步冲洗的溶液为17%乙二胺四乙酸和2.5%次氯酸钠,采用三种方法:1)注射器针头冲洗/传统方法;2)被动超声冲洗;3)XP-endo Finisher搅拌。所用的根管封闭剂为:EndoSequence BC封闭剂和AH-Plus封闭剂。采用单锥技术对根管进行充填,然后将牙根切成2毫米厚的切片(每个牙根切3片)。用万能试验机对切片标本(颈部、中部和根尖三分之一处)进行推出试验。粘结强度值以兆帕(MPa)记录。随后,将每个标本纵向劈开以确定失败类型。数据分析采用约翰逊变换、三因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和偏η²检验。
封闭剂之间的粘结强度存在显著差异[AH:4.46±2.24,BC:3.47±2.19 MPa(<0.001)];最后一步冲洗方法之间[被动超声冲洗:4.52±2.25,XP-endo Finisher:3.93±3.93,注射器针头冲洗/传统方法:3.37±2.51 MPa(<0.001)],以及切片标本所代表的根管三分之一处之间[颈部:5.45±2.39,中部:4.14±1.99,根尖:2.30±1.30 MPa(<0.001)]。变量之间的相互作用无显著性(>0.05)。
最后冲洗溶液的搅拌可改善封闭剂与根管壁的粘结。AH-Plus封闭剂的粘结强度最高。粘结强度向根尖三分之一处显著降低。