Ferreira Inês, Braga Ana Cristina, Pina-Vaz Irene
Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, CINTESIS, University of Porto, Portugal.
Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of Porto, CINTESIS, University of Porto, Portugal.
Iran Endod J. 2021;16(1):17-25. doi: 10.22037/iej.v16i1.29297.
The aim of our systematic review was to assess the impact of gutta-percha solvents on the bond strength of endodontic sealers to intraradicular dentin using the push-out bond test.
The literature was searched in databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) up to September 2020, using the following search terms: (bond strength AND solvent* AND sealer* AND (tooth root OR dentin OR retreatment OR root canal). No date limits were implemented, and English languages were included. The question research was constructed based on the PICO () strategy: "Does gutta-percha solvents effect the bond strength of sealers to intraradicular dentin?". The studies were analyzed by two reviewers and were included if they utilized extracted permanent human teeth with completely formed apices, as well as assessed the influence of gutta-percha solvents on the bond strength of sealers to intraradicular dentin using push-out bond test. Review articles, case reports and studies that included immature, bovine or artificial teeth were excluded. The risk of bias was evaluated based on the Cochrane criteria adopted to studies.
Thirty-two papers were analyzed, seven accomplished the eligibility criteria and were selected for our systematic review. The global risk of bias was high. Due to variations in the methodological variables, a meta-analysis could not be performed.
Our systematic review highlighted the adverse effect of chloroform, which decreased the bond strength of different sealers, and the generally higher bond strength of epoxy resin-based sealers, detected with the push-out bond test. We recommend the standardization of methods in future studies to obtain a more definitive conclusion about the influence of solvents on the bond strength of sealers to intraradicular dentin.
我们系统评价的目的是使用推出粘结试验评估牙胶溶剂对根管封闭剂与根管内牙本质粘结强度的影响。
截至2020年9月,在数据库(PubMed、科学网和Scopus)中检索文献,使用以下检索词:(粘结强度 AND 溶剂* AND 封闭剂* AND(牙根 OR 牙本质 OR 再治疗 OR 根管))。未设置日期限制,纳入英文文献。基于PICO()策略构建问题研究:“牙胶溶剂是否会影响封闭剂与根管内牙本质的粘结强度?”。由两名 reviewers 对研究进行分析,若研究使用根尖完全形成的拔除恒牙,且使用推出粘结试验评估牙胶溶剂对封闭剂与根管内牙本质粘结强度的影响,则纳入研究。排除综述文章、病例报告以及包含未成熟牙、牛牙或人造牙的研究。基于适用于研究的Cochrane标准评估偏倚风险。
分析了32篇论文,7篇符合纳入标准并被选入我们的系统评价。整体偏倚风险较高。由于方法学变量存在差异,无法进行荟萃分析。
我们的系统评价强调了氯仿的不良影响,即降低了不同封闭剂的粘结强度,以及通过推出粘结试验检测到的基于环氧树脂的封闭剂通常具有较高的粘结强度。我们建议未来研究中对方法进行标准化,以获得关于溶剂对封闭剂与根管内牙本质粘结强度影响的更明确结论。