Kleindorfer Sonia, Krupka Mara A, Katsis Andrew C, Frigerio Didone, Common Lauren K
Konrad Lorenz Research Center for Behavior and Cognition, Core Facility of the University of Vienna, Grünau im Almtal, Vienna 4645, Austria.
Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 3;11(4):231686. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231686. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Individual differences in aggressiveness, if consistent across time and contexts, may contribute to the long-term maintenance of social hierarchies in complex animal societies. Although agonistic interactions have previously been used to calculate individuals' positions within a dominance hierarchy, to date the repeatability of agonistic behaviour has not been tested when calculating social rank. Here, we examined the consistency and social relevance of aggressiveness as a personality trait in a free-flying population of greylag geese (). For each individual, we quantified (i) aggressiveness using a standardized mirror stimulation test and (ii) dominance ranking based on the number of agonistic interactions won and lost in a feeding context. We found that individual differences in aggressiveness were significantly repeatable and that individuals' aggressiveness predicted their dominance rank position. The flock showed a robust and intermediately steep dominance hierarchy. Social rank was higher in paired birds, males and older birds, and most agonistic interactions occurred between individuals with moderate rank differences. We suggest that selection favours aggressiveness as a personality trait associated with resource acquisition and social rank, whereby a dominance hierarchy may increase the benefits of group living and reduce costs over conflict within dyads.
攻击性方面的个体差异,如果在时间和情境中保持一致,可能有助于复杂动物社会中社会等级制度的长期维持。尽管先前已使用争斗性互动来计算个体在优势等级中的位置,但迄今为止,在计算社会等级时,争斗行为的重复性尚未得到测试。在此,我们研究了在自由飞行的灰雁群体中,攻击性作为一种个性特征的一致性和社会相关性。对于每只个体,我们进行了以下量化:(i)使用标准化镜像刺激测试来量化攻击性,以及(ii)根据在进食情境中赢得和输掉的争斗性互动次数来确定优势等级。我们发现攻击性方面的个体差异具有显著的重复性,并且个体的攻击性能够预测其优势等级位置。雁群呈现出一个稳固且中等陡峭程度的优势等级制度。成对的鸟、雄性鸟和年长的鸟社会等级更高,并且大多数争斗性互动发生在等级差异适中的个体之间。我们认为,选择有利于将攻击性作为一种与资源获取和社会等级相关的个性特征,由此优势等级制度可能会增加群体生活的益处,并降低二元组内冲突的成本。