Scheiber Isabella B R, Weiß Brigitte M, Frigerio Didone, Kotrschal Kurt
Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle für Ethologie, A-4645 Grünau 11, Austria.
Behaviour. 2005 Nov 1;142(11-12):1535-1557. doi: 10.1163/156853905774831873.
In general, support by social allies may reduce stress, increase success in agonistic encounters and ease access to resources. Social support was mainly known from mammals, particularly primates, and has been studied in birds only recently. Basically two types are known: (i) 'active social support', which describes the participation of a social ally in agonistic encounters, and (ii) 'passive social support' in which the mere presence of a social ally reduces behavioural and physiological stress responses. In greylag geese (Anser anser) offspring stay with their parents for an entire year or even longer and therefore are a candidate avian model to study support by social allies. We investigated the effects of active and passive social support in ten families (ten males, ten females, 33 juveniles) in a free-roaming, semi-tame flock of greylag geese. Focal individuals were observed during three time periods: (i) re-establishment of the flock in the fall, (ii) stable winter flock, and (iii) disintegration of the flock and break-up of family bonds. We recorded all agonistic interactions of the members of one focal family during morning feedings for two consecutive days: a control day, in which food was distributed widely, and a social density stress situation, in which the same amount of food was spread over a much smaller area. In addition, we collected faeces of all individuals within this family for three hours from the beginning of the feeding situation for determining excreted corticosterone immuno-reactive metabolites by enzyme immuno assay. We found that the small families, i.e. pairs with one or two accompanying young, were involved in more agonistic interactions, mainly through the lack of active social support, as compared to large families in the same situation. Members of greylag goose families lost agonistic encounters significantly less often when actively supported. In addition, the excretion of corticosterone metabolites was significantly decreased in large families during a social density stress situation, probably as an effect of passive social support. Via such a socially induced decrease in hormonal stress response during challenging situations, an individual's long term energy management may benefit.
一般来说,来自社会盟友的支持可以减轻压力,增加在争斗性遭遇中的成功率,并便于获取资源。社会支持主要在哺乳动物中为人所知,尤其是灵长类动物,而直到最近才在鸟类中进行研究。基本上已知两种类型:(i)“主动社会支持”,它描述了社会盟友参与争斗性遭遇,以及(ii)“被动社会支持”,其中社会盟友的单纯在场会降低行为和生理应激反应。在灰雁(Anser anser)中,幼鸟会与父母呆上一整年甚至更长时间,因此是研究社会盟友支持的候选鸟类模型。我们在一个自由放养、半驯化的灰雁群中,对十个家庭(十只雄性、十只雌性、33只幼鸟)的主动和被动社会支持的影响进行了调查。在三个时间段观察焦点个体:(i)秋季重新组建雁群时,(ii)稳定的冬季雁群时,以及(iii)雁群解体和家庭纽带破裂时。我们连续两天在早晨喂食期间记录一个焦点家庭成员的所有争斗性互动:一个对照日,食物分布广泛;以及一个社会密度应激情境,同样数量的食物分布在小得多的区域。此外,我们在喂食情境开始后的三个小时内收集这个家庭所有个体的粪便,通过酶免疫测定法测定排泄的皮质酮免疫反应性代谢物。我们发现,与处于相同情境的大家庭相比,小家庭,即一对成年雁带着一两只幼鸟的家庭,参与的争斗性互动更多,主要是因为缺乏主动社会支持。当得到主动支持时,灰雁家庭成员输掉争斗性遭遇的次数显著减少。此外,在社会密度应激情境下,大家庭中皮质酮代谢物的排泄显著减少,这可能是被动社会支持的作用。通过在具有挑战性的情境中社会诱导的激素应激反应降低,个体的长期能量管理可能会受益。