School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2024 Apr 24;138(8):537-554. doi: 10.1042/CS20240220.
Patients with pulmonary fibrosis (PF) often experience exacerbations of their disease, characterised by a rapid, severe deterioration in lung function that is associated with high mortality. Whilst the pathobiology of such exacerbations is poorly understood, virus infection is a trigger. The present study investigated virus-induced injury responses of alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells (AECs and BECs, respectively) from patients with PF and age-matched controls (Ctrls). Air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures of AECs, comprising type I and II pneumocytes or BECs were inoculated with influenza A virus (H1N1) at 0.1 multiplicity of infection (MOI). Levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-36γ and IL-1β were elevated in cultures of AECs from PF patients (PF-AECs, n = 8-11), being markedly higher than Ctrl-AECs (n = 5-6), 48 h post inoculation (pi) (P<0.05); despite no difference in H1N1 RNA copy numbers 24 h pi. Furthermore, the virus-induced inflammatory responses of PF-AECs were greater than BECs (from either PF patients or controls), even though viral loads in the BECs were overall 2- to 3-fold higher than AECs. Baseline levels of the senescence and DNA damage markers, nuclear p21, p16 and H2AXγ were also significantly higher in PF-AECs than Ctrl-AECs and further elevated post-infection. Senescence induction using etoposide augmented virus-induced injuries in AECs (but not viral load), whereas selected senotherapeutics (rapamycin and mitoTEMPO) were protective. The present study provides evidence that senescence increases the susceptibility of AECs from PF patients to severe virus-induced injury and suggests targeting senescence may provide an alternative option to prevent or treat the exacerbations that worsen the underlying disease.
肺纤维化 (PF) 患者常经历疾病恶化,其特征为肺功能迅速严重恶化,与高死亡率相关。虽然此类恶化的病理生物学机制尚不清楚,但病毒感染是一个诱因。本研究调查了 PF 患者和年龄匹配的对照 (Ctrl) 肺泡和支气管上皮细胞 (AECs 和 BECs) 的病毒诱导损伤反应。用流感 A 病毒 (H1N1) 以 0.1 感染复数 (MOI) 接种 AECs 的气液界面 (ALI) 培养物,包含 I 型和 II 型肺泡细胞或 BEC。PF 患者 (PF-AECs,n = 8-11) 的 AEC 培养物中白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、IL-36γ 和 IL-1β 水平升高,接种后 48 小时 (pi) 明显高于 Ctrl-AECs (n = 5-6) (P<0.05);尽管接种后 24 小时病毒 RNA 拷贝数无差异。此外,PF-AEC 的病毒诱导炎症反应大于 BEC (来自 PF 患者或对照),尽管 BEC 中的病毒载量总体上比 AEC 高 2-3 倍。PF-AEC 中的衰老和 DNA 损伤标志物核 p21、p16 和 H2AXγ 的基线水平也明显高于 Ctrl-AEC,感染后进一步升高。依托泊苷诱导衰老增加了 AEC 中的病毒诱导损伤 (但不增加病毒载量),而选定的衰老治疗药物 (雷帕霉素和 mitoTEMPO) 具有保护作用。本研究提供的证据表明,衰老增加了 PF 患者 AEC 对严重病毒诱导损伤的易感性,并表明靶向衰老可能是预防或治疗恶化潜在疾病的恶化恶化的另一种选择。