Departments of1Neurology.
2Radiology, and.
J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 5;141(4):955-965. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS231852. Print 2024 Oct 1.
The risks and benefits of surgery for cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)-related lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are unclear. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on this topic.
The authors conducted a systematic review according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier were searched (on December 27, 2022) for relevant articles. Study inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT), cohort study, cross-sectional design, or case series with more than 5 patients; 2) possible, probable, or definite CAA according to the Boston criteria (version 1.0 or 1.5) or autopsy; 3) surgical intervention for acute ICH; and 4) data on peri- and/or postoperative outcomes. Primary outcomes were the presence of intraoperative hemorrhage (IOH), postoperative hemorrhage (POH), and early ICH recurrence. Secondary outcomes were 3-month mortality, late ICH recurrence, functional outcome at discharge, and factors associated with poor outcome. Pooled estimates were calculated, and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess risk of bias.
Four cohort studies and 15 case series (n = 738 patients, mean age 70 years, 56% women) were included. IOH occurred in 2 (0.6%) of 352 patients. Pooled estimates for POH were 13.0% (30/225) for less than 48 hours and 6.2% (3/437) for 48 hours to 14 days. Overall recurrent ICH (mean follow-up 19 months, n = 5 studies) occurred in 11% of patients. Outcome was predominantly poor with a pooled 3-month mortality rate of 19% and good outcome of 23%. Factors associated with poor outcome were advanced age, poor condition on admission, preexisting dementia, and concomitant intraventricular, subarachnoid, or subdural hemorrhage. All studies contained possible sources of bias and reporting was heterogeneous.
Surgery in CAA-related ICH is safe with no substantial IOH, POH, and early recurrent hemorrhage risk. Outcome appears to be poor, however, especially in older patients, although good quality of evidence is lacking. Patients with CAA should not be excluded from ongoing surgery RCTs in ICH to enable future subgroup analysis of this specific patient population.
脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)相关性脑叶脑出血(ICH)手术的风险和获益尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统地回顾该主题的文献。
作者根据 2020 年 PRISMA 声明进行了系统评价。检索了 PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、Emcare 和 Academic Search Premier 上的相关文章(截至 2022 年 12 月 27 日)。研究纳入标准为:1)随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究、横断面设计或超过 5 例的病例系列;2)根据波士顿标准(1.0 或 1.5 版)或尸检可能、可能或明确的 CAA;3)急性 ICH 的手术干预;4)围手术期和/或术后结局数据。主要结局为术中出血(IOH)、术后出血(POH)和早期 ICH 复发。次要结局为 3 个月死亡率、迟发性 ICH 复发、出院时的功能结局以及与不良结局相关的因素。计算了汇总估计值,并使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所批判性评估工具评估了偏倚风险。
纳入了 4 项队列研究和 15 项病例系列研究(n=738 例患者,平均年龄 70 岁,56%为女性)。352 例患者中有 2 例(0.6%)发生 IOH。POH 的汇总估计值为小于 48 小时为 13.0%(30/225),48 小时至 14 天为 6.2%(3/437)。总体上,ICH 复发(平均随访 19 个月,n=5 项研究)的发生率为 11%。结局主要较差,3 个月死亡率为 19%,预后良好为 23%。与不良结局相关的因素是年龄较大、入院时状况较差、存在预先存在的痴呆症以及伴有脑室内、蛛网膜下腔或脑皮下血肿。所有研究都存在潜在的偏倚来源,且报告存在异质性。
CAA 相关性 ICH 手术安全,无明显 IOH、POH 和早期复发性出血风险。然而,预后似乎较差,尤其是在老年患者中,尽管缺乏高质量的证据。CAA 患者不应被排除在正在进行的 ICH 手术 RCT 之外,以便对这一特定患者群体进行未来的亚组分析。