School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
School of Health & Psychological Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e081637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081637.
An association between deep sedation and adverse short-term outcomes has been demonstrated although this evidence has been inconsistent. The A2B (alpha-2 agonists for sedation in critical care) sedation trial is designed to determine whether the alpha-2 agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine, compared with usual care, are clinically and cost-effective. The A2B intervention is a complex intervention conducted in 39 intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK. Multicentre organisational factors, variable cultures, perceptions and practices and the involvement of multiple members of the healthcare team add to the complexity of the A2B trial. From our pretrial contextual exploration it was apparent that routine practices such as type and frequency of pain, agitation and delirium assessment, as well as the common sedative agents used, varied widely across the UK. Anticipated challenges in implementing A2B focused on the impact of usual practice, perceptions of risk, ICU culture, structure and the presence of equipoise. Given this complexity, a process evaluation has been embedded in the A2B trial to uncover factors that could impact successful delivery and explore their impact on intervention delivery and interpretation of outcomes.
This is a mixed-methods process evaluation guided by the A2B intervention logic model. It includes two phases of data collection conducted during and at the end of trial. Data will be collected using a combination of questionnaires, stakeholder interviews and routinely collected trial data. A framework approach will be used to analyse qualitative data with synthesis of data within and across the phases. The nature of the relationship between delivery of the A2B intervention and the trial primary and secondary outcomes will be explored.
All elements of the A2B trial, including the process evaluation, are approved by Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref. 18/SS/0085). Dissemination will be via publications, presentations and media engagement.
NCT03653832.
尽管有证据不一致,但深度镇静与短期不良结局之间存在关联。A2B(用于重症监护镇静的α-2 激动剂)镇静试验旨在确定与常规护理相比,α-2 激动剂可乐定和右美托咪定是否在临床上和具有成本效益。A2B 干预是在英国 39 个重症监护病房(ICU)中进行的一项复杂干预。多中心组织因素、不同的文化、观念和实践,以及医疗团队多个成员的参与,增加了 A2B 试验的复杂性。从我们的前期背景探索中可以明显看出,在整个英国,常规做法(如疼痛、躁动和谵妄评估的类型和频率,以及常用镇静剂)差异很大。在实施 A2B 方面预期面临的挑战集中在常规做法的影响、风险感知、ICU 文化、结构和均衡的存在。鉴于这种复杂性,A2B 试验中嵌入了一个过程评估,以揭示可能影响成功交付的因素,并探讨其对干预交付和结果解释的影响。
这是一项混合方法的过程评估,由 A2B 干预逻辑模型指导。它包括在试验期间和结束时进行的两个阶段的数据收集。数据将通过问卷、利益相关者访谈和常规收集的试验数据的组合进行收集。将使用框架方法对定性数据进行分析,并在各阶段内和各阶段之间对数据进行综合。将探索 A2B 干预的交付与试验主要和次要结果之间的关系性质。
A2B 试验的所有要素,包括过程评估,均已获得苏格兰 A 研究伦理委员会的批准(Ref. 18/SS/0085)。将通过出版物、演讲和媒体参与进行传播。
NCT03653832。