• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中预防整合的因素:综述概述

Factors for the integration of prevention in primary care: an overview of reviews.

作者信息

Clet Estelle, Leblanc Pierre, Alla François, Cohidon Christine

机构信息

Prevention Department, University Hospital Centre Bordeaux Division of Public Health, Bordeaux, France

I-prev/PHARES (INSERM U1219), Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0141. Print 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0141
PMID:38580389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523499/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global burden of non-communicable diseases is increasing and the need for prevention is huge. Policies have yet to produce results and prevention indicators remain low. Primary care (PC) represents an opportunity to optimise the practice of prevention, but GPs are coming up against barriers that are holding back their prevention practices.

AIM

To identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of routine prevention practices in PC.

DESIGN & SETTING: This study is an international overview of reviews focusing on the integration of prevention in PC settings.

METHOD

The search was conducted in July 2022 using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Included reviews are systematic reviews or scoping reviews adopting a systematic approach.

RESULTS

The 35 reviews included identify multiple barriers and facilitators related to the integration of prevention in PC. These factors are heterogeneous with regard to their source (the patient, the professional, and the health system) and their level of action (individual, organisational, or contextual). The results show the need to organise PC at the professional level (for example, in training), at the local level (for example, the information system), and at the political level (for example, the unclear definition of the role of professionals).

CONCLUSION

The factors influencing the integration of prevention in PC are multiple and act at different levels (individual, organisational, and health-system level). Organisation factors play a major role and seem to be a means of overcoming the difficulties encountered by healthcare professionals in developing preventive practices.

摘要

背景

非传染性疾病的全球负担正在增加,预防需求巨大。相关政策尚未产生成效,预防指标仍然很低。初级保健(PC)是优化预防实践的一个契机,但全科医生(GPs)面临着阻碍其预防实践的障碍。

目的

确定在初级保健中实施常规预防实践的障碍和促进因素。

设计与背景

本研究是一项关于将预防纳入初级保健环境的综述的国际概述。

方法

2022年7月使用MEDLINE、Embase、科学引文索引和Cochrane系统评价数据库进行检索。纳入的综述为采用系统方法的系统评价或范围综述。

结果

纳入的35篇综述确定了与将预防纳入初级保健相关的多个障碍和促进因素。这些因素在来源(患者、专业人员和卫生系统)及其作用层面(个人、组织或背景)方面具有异质性。结果表明,需要在专业层面(如培训方面)、地方层面(如信息系统方面)和政策层面(如专业人员角色定义不明确方面)对初级保健进行组织。

结论

影响将预防纳入初级保健的因素是多方面的,且在不同层面(个人、组织和卫生系统层面)发挥作用。组织因素起着主要作用,似乎是克服医疗保健专业人员在开展预防实践中遇到的困难的一种手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/11523499/e57ce47461ec/BJGPO.2023.0141-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/11523499/84ad49603242/BJGPO.2023.0141-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/11523499/e57ce47461ec/BJGPO.2023.0141-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/11523499/84ad49603242/BJGPO.2023.0141-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5e0/11523499/e57ce47461ec/BJGPO.2023.0141-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors for the integration of prevention in primary care: an overview of reviews.初级保健中预防整合的因素:综述概述
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0141. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Achieving change in primary care--causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews.实现初级保健变革——证据与实践差距的成因:综述的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 22;11:40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating prevention into primary care organizations: a case study in France.将预防工作纳入基层医疗组织:法国的一个案例研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 10;26(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02849-3.
2
Exploring the Feasibility of a 5-Week mHealth Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity and an Active, Healthy Lifestyle in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.探索为期5周的移动健康干预措施在社区居住的老年人中增强身体活动及促进积极健康生活方式的可行性:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 27;8:e63348. doi: 10.2196/63348.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel.基层医疗保健从业者临床行为改变的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架和行为改变轮对综述的理论启发式系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;11(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2.
2
A review of primary healthcare practitioners' views about nutrition: implications for medical education.初级保健医生对营养的看法综述:对医学教育的启示。
Int J Med Educ. 2022 May 26;13:124-137. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6271.3aa2.
3
Implementation of evidence-based nutritional management in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review.
基层医疗卫生机构循证营养管理的实施:一项系统综述性研究
Aust J Prim Health. 2022 Feb;28(1):1-17. doi: 10.1071/PY20280.
4
Delivering brief physical activity interventions in primary care: a systematic review.在初级保健中实施简短的身体活动干预措施:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Feb 24;72(716):e209-e216. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0312. Print 2022 Mar.
5
Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants.全球高血压患病率趋势及 1990 至 2019 年治疗和控制进展情况:1040 万参与者、1201 项人群代表性研究的汇总分析
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
6
A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations.系统评价和综合定性和定量研究,评估提供者、患者和医疗保健系统相关障碍,以进行皮肤癌诊断检查。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2022 May;314(4):329-340. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02224-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Assessing primary care organization and performance: Literature synthesis and proposition of a consolidated framework.评估初级保健组织和绩效:文献综述与综合框架的提出。
Health Policy. 2021 Feb;125(2):160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.对英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查行为的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2.
10
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.