• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查行为的影响:一项系统综述

Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.

作者信息

Atkins Lou, Stefanidou Chryssa, Chadborn Tim, Thompson Katherine, Michie Susan, Lorencatto Fabi

机构信息

Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, WC1N 3AZ, London, UK.

Public Health England Behavioural Insights, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2
PMID:32938432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7495879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

National Health Service Health Checks were introduced in 2009 to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks and events. Since then, national evaluations have highlighted the need to maximise the programme's impact by improving coverage and outputs. To address these challenges it is important to understand the extent to which positive behaviours are influenced across the NHS Health Check pathway and encourage the promotion or minimisation of behavioural facilitators and barriers respectively. This study applied behavioural science frameworks to: i) identify behaviours and actors relevant to uptake, delivery and follow up of NHS Health Checks and influences on these behaviours and; ii) signpost to example intervention content.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies reporting behaviours related to NHS Health Check-related behaviours of patients, health care professionals (HCPs) and commissioners. Influences on behaviours were coded using theory-based models: COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Potential intervention types and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were suggested to target key influences.

RESULTS

We identified 37 studies reporting nine behaviours and influences for eight of these. The most frequently identified influences were physical opportunity including HCPs having space and time to deliver NHS Health Checks and patients having money to adhere to recommendations to change diet and physical activity. Other key influences were motivational, such as beliefs about consequences about the value of NHS Health Checks and behaviour change, and social, such as influences of others on behaviour change. The following techniques are suggested for websites or smartphone apps: Adding objects to the environment, e.g. provide HCPs with electronic schedules to guide timely delivery of Health Checks to target physical opportunity, Social support (unspecified), e.g. include text suggesting patients to ask a colleague to agree in advance to join them in taking the 'healthy option' lunch at work; Information about health consequences, e.g. quotes and/or videos from patients talking about the health benefits of changes they have made.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the application of behavioural science we identified key behaviours and their influences which informed recommendations for intervention content. To ascertain the extent to which this reflects existing interventions we recommend a review of relevant evidence.

摘要

背景

国民健康服务健康检查于2009年推出,旨在降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险和事件。自那时以来,全国性评估强调需要通过提高覆盖率和产出量来最大化该项目的影响。为应对这些挑战,了解在国民健康服务健康检查流程中积极行为受到影响的程度,并分别鼓励促进或减少行为促进因素和障碍,这一点很重要。本研究应用行为科学框架来:i)识别与国民健康服务健康检查的接受、实施和随访相关的行为及行为者,以及对这些行为的影响;ii)为示例干预内容提供指引。

方法

对报告患者、医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和专员与国民健康服务健康检查相关行为的研究进行系统综述。使用基于理论的模型(COM-B和理论领域框架(TDF))对行为影响进行编码。针对关键影响因素,提出了潜在的干预类型和行为改变技术(BCTs)。

结果

我们识别出37项研究,报告了9种行为以及其中8种行为的影响因素。最常识别出的影响因素包括物质机会,例如医疗保健专业人员有空间和时间进行国民健康服务健康检查,以及患者有钱遵循改变饮食和身体活动的建议;其他关键影响因素包括动机方面的,如对国民健康服务健康检查价值和行为改变后果的信念,以及社会方面的,如他人对行为改变的影响。针对网站或智能手机应用程序,建议采用以下技术:在环境中添加物品,例如为医疗保健专业人员提供电子日程安排,以指导及时进行健康检查,解决物质机会问题;社会支持(未明确说明),例如包含文本建议患者请同事提前同意与他们一起在工作时选择“健康选项”午餐;关于健康后果的信息,例如患者谈论他们所做改变的健康益处的引述和/或视频。

结论

通过应用行为科学,我们识别出关键行为及其影响因素,为干预内容提供了建议。为确定这在多大程度上反映了现有干预措施,我们建议对相关证据进行综述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/b44d00d3c99a/12889_2020_9365_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/2ba8085a59c2/12889_2020_9365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/805f04f29e6c/12889_2020_9365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/5eb407ab456e/12889_2020_9365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/b30e2f43c548/12889_2020_9365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/b44d00d3c99a/12889_2020_9365_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/2ba8085a59c2/12889_2020_9365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/805f04f29e6c/12889_2020_9365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/5eb407ab456e/12889_2020_9365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/b30e2f43c548/12889_2020_9365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b3/7495879/b44d00d3c99a/12889_2020_9365_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.对英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查行为的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09365-2.
2
Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions.降低导尿管相关尿路感染:对障碍因素与促进因素的系统评价及干预措施的策略性行为分析
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 6;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2.
3
Defining the content and delivery of an intervention to Change AdhereNce to treatment in BonchiEctasis (CAN-BE): a qualitative approach incorporating the Theoretical Domains Framework, behavioural change techniques and stakeholder expert panels.界定改变支气管扩张症治疗依从性干预措施的内容与实施方式(CAN-BE):一种融合理论领域框架、行为改变技术和利益相关者专家小组的定性研究方法
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 22;15:342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1004-z.
4
Exploring how health behaviours are supported and changed in people with severe mental illness: A qualitative study of a cardiovascular risk reducing intervention in Primary Care in England.探索如何在患有严重精神疾病的人群中支持和改变健康行为:英格兰初级保健中心心血管风险降低干预的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):428-451. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12415. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.了解英国二级和三级医疗保健机构中医护人员对患者投诉的反应:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价和行为分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 1;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.
6
'It's difficult, I think it's complicated': Health care professionals' barriers and enablers to providing opportunistic behaviour change interventions during routine medical consultations.“这很困难,我认为这很复杂”:医疗保健专业人员在常规医疗咨询中提供机会性行为改变干预措施的障碍和促成因素。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):571-592. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12368. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Using Behaviour Change Techniques to characterize patient educational interventions in tertiary individual prevention of work-related skin diseases.运用行为改变技术来描述三级个体职业性皮肤病预防中的患者教育干预。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 May 24;14(6):341-352. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad081.
8
Key influences on university students' physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour.关键影响因素大学生的身体活动:使用理论领域框架和人类行为的 COM-B 模型进行系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4.
9
Designing the Healthy Eating and Active Lifestyles for Diabetes (HEAL-D) self-management and support programme for UK African and Caribbean communities: a culturally tailored, complex intervention under-pinned by behaviour change theory.为英国非洲和加勒比社区设计健康饮食和积极生活方式(HEAL-D)自我管理和支持计划:基于行为改变理论的文化适应性、复杂干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):1146. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7411-z.
10
Applying the behaviour change wheel to develop a smartphone application 'stay-active' to increase physical activity in women with gestational diabetes.运用行为改变轮盘开发一款智能手机应用程序“保持活跃”,以增加妊娠期糖尿病女性的身体活动量。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04539-9.

引用本文的文献

1
From geroscience to precision geromedicine: Understanding and managing aging.从老年科学到精准老年医学:理解与应对衰老
Cell. 2025 Apr 17;188(8):2043-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.011.
2
The effectiveness of interventions used to improve general health check uptake by the older adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于提高老年人群体接受一般健康检查率的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;5(3):e0004362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004362. eCollection 2025.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an online tool for linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action based on triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus.基于文献综合和专家共识研究结果的三角测量,开发一种将行为改变技术与作用机制相联系的在线工具。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1049-1065. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa050.
2
Implementing multiple health behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction in primary care: a qualitative study.实施多种健康行为改变干预措施以降低初级保健中的心血管疾病风险:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 30;19(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0860-0.
3
Uptake of NHS health check: issues in monitoring.
利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.了解英国二级和三级医疗保健机构中医护人员对患者投诉的反应:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价和行为分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 1;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.
5
Feasibility of multiorgan risk prediction with routinely collected diagnostics: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.多器官风险预测的可行性与常规收集的诊断:英国生物库的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Sep 20;29(5):313-323. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112518.
6
"They are saying it's high, but I think it's quite low": exploring cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS health checks through video-stimulated recall interviews with patients - a qualitative study.“他们说这个数值很高,但我觉得挺低的”:通过对患者进行视频刺激回忆访谈探索英国国家医疗服务体系健康检查中的心血管疾病风险沟通——一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 23;25(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02357-w.
7
Identifying barriers and facilitators to primary care practitioners implementing health assessments for people with intellectual disability: a Theoretical Domains Framework-informed scoping review.识别初级保健从业者对智障人士进行健康评估的障碍和促进因素:一项基于理论领域框架的范围综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Apr 16;5(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00579-8.
8
Factors for the integration of prevention in primary care: an overview of reviews.初级保健中预防整合的因素:综述概述
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0141. Print 2024 Oct.
9
'It seems like a luxury to be able to offer that': Factors influencing the implementation of annual health checks for autistic people in England.“能够提供这一点似乎是一种奢侈”:影响英国自闭症患者年度健康检查实施的因素。
Autism. 2024 Mar;28(3):656-673. doi: 10.1177/13623613231182011. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
10
A Case-Finding Protocol for High Cardiovascular Risk in a Primary Care Dental School-Model with Integrated Care.在初级保健牙科学校模型中进行高心血管风险的病例发现协议-综合护理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4959. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064959.
国民保健服务健康检查的接受情况:监测中的问题。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Aug 20;20:e64. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000592.
4
Local authority commissioning of NHS Health Checks: A regression analysis of the first three years.地方当局对国民保健制度健康检查的委托:头三年的回归分析。
Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):1035-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review.NHS 健康检查在头 8 年的实施情况和影响:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68(672):e449-e459. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X697649. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature.糖尿病视网膜病变筛查参与的障碍因素和促进因素:已发表文献和灰色文献的系统评价。
Diabet Med. 2018 Oct;35(10):1308-1319. doi: 10.1111/dme.13686. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: formative evaluation of the programme in early phase implementation.英国国民保健制度糖尿病预防计划:该计划早期实施阶段的形成性评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 21;8(2):e019467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019467.
8
Views of commissioners, managers and healthcare professionals on the NHS Health Check programme: a systematic review.专员、管理人员和医疗保健专业人员对国民健康服务健康检查计划的看法:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e018606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018606.
9
GPs' knowledge, use, and confidence in national physical activity and health guidelines and tools: a questionnaire-based survey of general practice in England.全科医生对国家体力活动和健康指南及工具的了解、使用和信心:对英格兰普通实践的基于问卷调查的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Oct;67(663):e668-e675. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692513. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
Patient experience of NHS health checks: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)健康检查的患者体验:系统评价与定性综合分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e017169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017169.