Department of Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 167# Beilishi Road, Beijing, 100037, China.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, 2999 Jinshan Road, Huli 25 District, Xiamen, 361008, China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Apr 5;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02634-w.
Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated by mesenteric malperfusion is a critical and complicated condition. The optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, debate exists as to whether aortic dissection or mesenteric malperfusion should be addressed first, and the exact time window for mesenteric ischemia intervention is still unclear. To solve this problem, we developed a new concept based on the pathophysiological mechanism of mesenteric ischemia, using a 6-hour time window to divide newly admitted patients by the time from onset to admission, applying different treatment protocols to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with ATAAD complicated by mesenteric malperfusion.
This was a retrospective study that covered a five-year period. From July 2018 to December 2020(phase I), all patients underwent emergency open surgery. From January 2021 to June 2023(phase II), patients with an onset within 6 h all underwent open surgical repair, followed by immediately postoperative examination if the malperfusion is suspected, while the restoration of mesenteric perfusion and visceral organ function was performed first, followed by open repair, in patients with an onset beyond 6 h.
There were no significant differences in baseline and surgical data. In phase I, eleven patients with mesenteric malperfusion underwent open surgery, while in phase II, our novel strategy was applied, with sixteen patients with an onset greater than 6 h and eleven patients with an onset less than 6 h. During the waiting period, none died of aortic rupture, but four patients died of organ failure, twelve patients had organ function improvement and underwent surgery successfully survived. The overall mortality rate decreased with the use of this novel strategy (54.55% vs. 18.52%, p = 0.047). Furthermore, the surgical mortality rate between the two periods showed even stronger statistical significance (54.55% vs. 4.35%, p = 0.022). Moreover, the proportions of patients with sepsis and multiorgan failure also showed differences.
Our novel strategy for patients with ATAAD complicated by mesenteric malperfusion not only improves the surgical success rate but also reduces the overall mortality rate.
急性 A 型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)合并肠系膜血运障碍是一种危急且复杂的情况。最佳治疗策略仍存在争议,对于应首先处理主动脉夹层还是肠系膜血运障碍存在争议,肠系膜缺血干预的确切时间窗仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们根据肠系膜缺血的病理生理机制提出了一个新概念,使用 6 小时的时间窗将新入院的患者根据从发病到入院的时间进行分组,应用不同的治疗方案来改善 ATAAD 合并肠系膜血运障碍患者的临床结局。
这是一项回顾性研究,涵盖了五年时间。2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月(I 期)期间,所有患者均接受急诊开放手术。2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月(II 期)期间,6 小时内发病的患者均行开放手术修复,如怀疑有血运障碍,立即行术后检查,而 6 小时以上发病的患者,先恢复肠系膜灌注和内脏器官功能,再行开放修复。
两组患者的基线和手术数据无显著差异。在 I 期,11 例肠系膜血运障碍患者行开放手术,而在 II 期,我们应用了新策略,16 例发病超过 6 小时的患者和 11 例发病少于 6 小时的患者采用了新策略。在等待期间,没有患者因主动脉破裂而死亡,但有 4 例患者死于多器官功能衰竭,12 例患者器官功能改善并成功接受手术治疗。采用新策略后,总死亡率降低(54.55%比 18.52%,p=0.047)。此外,两期之间的手术死亡率差异具有更强的统计学意义(54.55%比 4.35%,p=0.022)。此外,败血症和多器官功能衰竭患者的比例也有所不同。
我们对 ATAAD 合并肠系膜血运障碍患者采用的新策略不仅提高了手术成功率,还降低了总体死亡率。