Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗局部进展期直肠癌:多中心病例系列的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。

Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK; University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):108308. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108308. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Around 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total mesorectal excision (bTME) for radicality. Robotic bTME is under investigation. This study reports perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic bTME for locally advanced rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected robotic bTME resections (July 2015-November 2020). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated.

RESULTS

One-hundred-sixty-eight patients (eight centres) were included. Median age and BMI were 60.0 (50.0-68.7) years and 24.0 (24.4-27.7) kg/m. Female sex was prevalent (n = 95, 56.8%). Fifty patients (29.6%) were ASA III-IV. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was given to 125 (74.4%) patients. Median operative time was 314.0 (260.0-450.0) minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150.0 (27.5-500.0) ml. Conversion to laparotomy was seen in 4.8%. Postoperative complications occurred in 77 (45.8%) patients; 27.3% and 3.9% were Clavien-Dindo III and IV, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% (n = 2). R0 rate was 92.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 72 (42.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 34.0 (10.0-65.7) months. Distant and local recurrences were seen in 35 (20.8%) and 15 patients (8.9%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 91.7, 82.1, and 76.8%. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 84.0, 74.5, and 69.2%.

CONCLUSION

Robotic bTME is technically safe with relatively low conversion rate, good OS, and acceptable DFS in the hands of experienced surgeons in high volume centres. In selected cases robotic approach allows for high R0 rates during bTME.

摘要

背景

约 20%的直肠肿瘤局部进展,在就诊时侵犯邻近结构。这些肿瘤可能需要超越全直肠系膜切除术(TME)边界的手术切除以达到根治性。机器人 bTME 正在研究中。本研究报告了机器人 bTME 治疗局部进展期直肠肿瘤的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。

材料与方法

对 2015 年 7 月至 2020 年 11 月期间前瞻性收集的机器人 bTME 切除病例进行多中心回顾性分析。研究了人口统计学、临床病理特征、短期结果、复发和生存情况。

结果

共纳入 168 例患者(8 个中心)。中位年龄和 BMI 分别为 60.0(50.0-68.7)岁和 24.0(24.4-27.7)kg/m。女性占优势(n=95,56.8%)。50 例(29.6%)患者为 ASA III-IV 级。125 例(74.4%)患者接受新辅助放化疗。中位手术时间为 314.0(260.0-450.0)分钟。中位估计出血量为 150.0(27.5-500.0)ml。中转开腹占 4.8%。77 例(45.8%)患者发生术后并发症;27.3%和 3.9%分别为 Clavien-Dindo III 级和 IV 级。30 天死亡率为 1.2%(n=2)。R0 切除率为 92.9%。72 例(42.9%)患者接受辅助化疗。中位随访时间为 34.0(10.0-65.7)个月。35 例(20.8%)和 15 例(8.9%)患者出现远处和局部复发。总生存(OS)率在 1、3 和 5 年时分别为 91.7%、82.1%和 76.8%。无病生存(DFS)率在 1、3 和 5 年时分别为 84.0%、74.5%和 69.2%。

结论

在高容量中心经验丰富的外科医生手中,机器人 bTME 在技术上是安全的,转换率相对较低,OS 良好,DFS 可接受。在某些病例中,机器人方法在 bTME 期间可实现高 R0 率。

相似文献

2
3
Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2498-2505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11634-3. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Robotic-assisted resection for beyond TME rectal cancer: a novel classification and analysis from a specialized center.
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1103-1114. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00898-0. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (r-TAMIS): perioperative and short-term outcomes for local excision of rectal cancers.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3368-3377. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10829-4. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Beyond total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer with organ or pelvic side-wall involvement.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;44(8):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic surgery for locally advanced T4 rectal cancer: feasibility and oncological quality.
Updates Surg. 2023 Apr;75(3):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01450-6. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
The 'Pelvic exenteration lexicon': Creating a common language for complex pelvic cancer surgery.
Colorectal Dis. 2023 May;25(5):888-896. doi: 10.1111/codi.16476. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN.
Gut. 2023 Feb;72(2):338-344. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers.
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Dec 15;25(4):131-138. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.131.
5
Utility of the da Vinci Xi platform in extended resections for locally advanced rectal cancer: A video vignette.
Colorectal Dis. 2023 May;25(5):1051-1052. doi: 10.1111/codi.16430. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
8
Robotic total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer: case report and review of literature.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Mar;104(3):e74-e78. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0137. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Optimizing outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery with robotic platforms.
Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;37:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101559. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
Robotic Abdominoperineal Excision with Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Mar 1;64(3):e58-e59. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001943.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验