Ezzati Kamran, Laakso E-Liisa, Salari Amir, Hasannejad Anahita, Fekrazad Reza, Aris Arash
Neuroscience Research Center, Poorsina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Allied Health Mater Research, Brisbane, Australia.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Winter;11(1):81-90. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2020.14. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been used more recently in the therapeutic protocols of pain managements. Adding therapeutic interventions to laser therapy is usual in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HILT and beneficial effects of adding cointerventions to HILT in musculoskeletal pain management. The following databases were searched up to August 2018: Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Springer and ISI. The keywords of pain, HILT, high power laser therapy, laser therapy, photobiomodulation, physical therapy and rehabilitation were searched. The quality of the articles was assessed using the PEDro scale. The primary measure was pain severity expected to be reported in all studies. Effect size was calculated as standardized mean differences divided by the standard deviation of either the treatment or other group. Initially 52 potential studies were found. Eighteen of these studies were excluded based on title and abstract. The full text of 34 remaining articles was screened and 15 of the studies were excluded. All included studies had high quality (PEDro ≥7). Approximately, 94% of included articles (n=18) revealed positive effects of HILT on pain. The effect sizes for HILT and placebo/comparator groups were 0.9-9.11 and 0.21-11.22 respectively. Also, the differences of effect size between two groups were between 0.03 to 5.85. It is early to determine that HILT may be an effective non-invasive agent in the management of musculoskeletal pain, as few studies have shown its clinical efficacy. Adding related co-interventions to HILT may enhance the beneficial effects of laser therapy. The variability of the study methods and outcomes suggests that further long-term follow-up, randomized controlled clinical trials with appropriate methodological design are needed regarding the effectiveness of HILT on pain.
高强度激光疗法(HILT)最近已被应用于疼痛管理的治疗方案中。在临床实践中,通常会在激光治疗中添加其他治疗干预措施。本研究旨在评估高强度激光疗法在肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中的疗效以及添加联合干预措施对高强度激光疗法的有益效果。截至2018年8月,对以下数据库进行了检索:医学索引数据库(Medline)、美国国立医学图书馆生物医学数据库(PubMed)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、考克兰图书馆(Cochrane)、谷歌学术搜索(Google Scholar)、施普林格(Springer)和科学信息研究所(ISI)。检索了疼痛、高强度激光疗法、高功率激光疗法、激光疗法、光生物调节、物理治疗和康复等关键词。使用PEDro量表评估文章质量。主要测量指标为预计在所有研究中报告的疼痛严重程度。效应量计算为标准化均数差除以治疗组或其他组的标准差。最初找到52项潜在研究。其中18项研究根据标题和摘要被排除。对其余34篇文章的全文进行了筛选,又排除了15项研究。所有纳入研究的质量都很高(PEDro≥7)。大约94%的纳入文章(n = 18)显示高强度激光疗法对疼痛有积极影响。高强度激光疗法组和安慰剂/对照组的效应量分别为0.9 - 9.11和0.21 - 11.22。此外,两组效应量的差异在0.03至5.85之间。由于很少有研究表明其临床疗效,因此现在确定高强度激光疗法可能是肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中一种有效的非侵入性手段还为时过早。在高强度激光疗法中添加相关联合干预措施可能会增强激光治疗的有益效果。研究方法和结果的可变性表明,关于高强度激光疗法对疼痛的有效性,需要进一步进行长期随访、采用适当方法设计的随机对照临床试验。