Zhang Hua, Qiu Shaodong, Chen Fei, Wang Xiaojun
Department of Medical Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 250, Changgang East Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2024 Mar 31;2024:9969628. doi: 10.1155/2024/9969628. eCollection 2024.
To explore the feasibility of serum albumin (Alb) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting all-cause death (ACD) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD).
Patients with SCAD were divided into 4 groups according to their Alb and LVEF levels: Group A: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF > 50%; Group B: Alb ≤4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group C: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF ≤50%; Group D: Alb >4 g/dL and LVEF >50%. The K-M curve and log-rank test were used to compare ACD among the four groups over three years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the efficacy of predicting ACD among the combination of Alb and LVEF and either Alb or LVEF alone. Cox regression analysis identified the influencing factors of ACD in patients with SCAD and detected the correlation between Alb and LVEF.
ACD occurred in 18 (8.9%) of 203 patients with SCAD, with an average follow-up of 26.53 ± 14.34 months. In the Kaplan‒Meier analysis, the risk of ACD in the four groups ranged from high to low: Group B (17.6%) > Group A (26.7%) > Group D (0.9%) > Group C (0%, < 0.001). The ROC curve showed that the combination of Alb and LVEF (AUC = 0.888) had better predictive value for ACD than either Alb (AUC = 0.879) or LVEF alone (AUC = 0.651), < 0.001. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Alb ≤4 g/dL predicted ACD events after adjusting for baseline (HR: 12.16, 95% CI: 1.57 to 94.41; =0.017) and treatment (HR: 19.36, 95% CI: 2.53-147.78, =0.004). Alb was positively correlated with LVEF ( = 0.22, =0.002).
Alb combined with LVEF is more effective than a single index in predicting ACD in SCAD and could be used as a new model to judge the prognosis of SCAD.
探讨血清白蛋白(Alb)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)预测稳定型冠状动脉疾病(SCAD)患者全因死亡(ACD)的可行性。
根据Alb和LVEF水平将SCAD患者分为4组:A组:Alb≤4 g/dL且LVEF>50%;B组:Alb≤4 g/dL且LVEF≤50%;C组:Alb>4 g/dL且LVEF≤50%;D组:Alb>4 g/dL且LVEF>50%。采用K-M曲线和对数秩检验比较3年中4组患者的ACD情况。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较Alb和LVEF联合、Alb或LVEF单独预测ACD的效能。Cox回归分析确定SCAD患者ACD的影响因素,并检测Alb与LVEF之间的相关性。
203例SCAD患者中18例(8.9%)发生ACD,平均随访26.53±14.34个月。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,4组患者的ACD风险从高到低依次为:B组(17.6%)>A组(26.7%)>D组(0.9%)>C组(0%,<0.001)。ROC曲线显示,Alb和LVEF联合(AUC=0.888)对ACD的预测价值优于Alb单独(AUC=0.879)或LVEF单独(AUC=0.651),P<0.001。多因素Cox回归分析显示,校正基线(HR:12.16,95%CI:1.57至94.41;P=0.017)和治疗因素(HR:19.36,95%CI:2.53-147.78,P=0.004)后,Alb≤4 g/dL可预测ACD事件。Alb与LVEF呈正相关(r=0.22,P=0.002)。
Alb联合LVEF预测SCAD患者ACD的效果优于单一指标,可作为判断SCAD预后的新模型。