Philip Sridhar Rajeevan, Raghunath Rajat, Ranjan Jesudason Mark, Mittal Rohin
General and Colorectal Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 7;16(3):e55700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55700. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Background Nutritional and immunological indices, such as prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), have been used as predictors of outcomes and survival in a few cancers. However, the literature is unclear about their usefulness in predicting postoperative complications in rectal cancer resection operations. Additionally, the prescribed cut-off values as well as the timing of the tests for these indices vary among studies. We aimed to determine the role of PNI, NLR, and PLR in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing rectal resection. Methods This is a retrospective analysis from a colorectal unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. All consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection for rectal cancer between April 2018 and March 2021 were included. PNI, NLR, and PLR were calculated from preoperative blood tests, and all morbidity and mortality within 30 days of operation were considered. Results A total of 202 patients were included. Three patients who did not have the necessary preoperative blood test reports were excluded. Of the remaining 199, 142 (71.4 %) were males. The mean age was 47.3 years. Of the patients, 13.6% (n = 27) had major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5), including one mortality. The mean PNI, NLR, and PLR were 49.9, 4.3, and 230.5, respectively. The mean PNI between the groups (no complication vs. complication) was 49.6 vs. 50.1 (p = 0.46) and the mean NLR between the same groups was 4.7 vs. 3.8, (p = 0.06), and both were not significant. The mean PLR between the groups (256.3 vs. 203.4, p = 0.01) was found to be significant but significance was not elicited when only major complications were considered. Hence, none of the indices were a good predictor of postoperative complications in our study. Conclusion The role of nutritional and immunological indices (PNI, NLR, and PLR) is limited in predicting postoperative morbidity in rectal resection operations.
背景 营养和免疫指标,如预后营养指数(PNI)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)以及血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR),已被用作一些癌症预后和生存的预测指标。然而,关于它们在预测直肠癌切除手术术后并发症方面的实用性,文献报道并不明确。此外,这些指标的规定临界值以及检测时间在不同研究中也有所不同。我们旨在确定PNI、NLR和PLR在预测接受直肠切除术患者术后并发症中的作用。方法 这是一项来自三级护理教学医院结直肠科的回顾性分析。纳入了2018年4月至2021年3月期间所有因直肠癌接受直肠切除术的连续患者。根据术前血液检查计算PNI、NLR和PLR,并考虑手术30天内的所有发病率和死亡率。结果 共纳入202例患者。排除3例没有必要术前血液检查报告的患者。在其余199例中,142例(71.4%)为男性。平均年龄为47.3岁。患者中,13.6%(n = 27)发生严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo 3 - 5级),包括1例死亡。平均PNI、NLR和PLR分别为49.9、4.3和230.5。两组(无并发症组与并发症组)之间的平均PNI为49.6对50.1(p = 0.46),相同两组之间的平均NLR为4.7对3.8(p = 0.06),两者均无统计学意义。两组之间的平均PLR(256.3对203.4,p = 0.01)具有统计学意义,但仅考虑严重并发症时未得出显著性差异。因此,在我们的研究中,没有一个指标是术后并发症的良好预测指标。结论 营养和免疫指标(PNI、NLR和PLR)在预测直肠切除手术术后发病率方面的作用有限。