Morimoto Tadatsugu, Hirata Hirohito, Watanabe Kazuyuki, Kato Kinshi, Otani Koji, Mawatari Masaaki, Nikaido Takuya
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, JPN.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55772. eCollection 2024 Mar.
The deep tendon reflex (DTR) is a more objective indicator than sensory and muscle assessments for lumbar spine disorders. Further, unlike sensory and muscle assessments that require patient cooperation, the DTR can be assessed even in patients with impaired consciousness or cognition. Therefore, DTR assessment with a hammer is an essential neurological test for lumbar spinal diseases. However, despite the usefulness of DTR assessment, few reports have described the significance of increased, diminished, or absent deep lower extremity reflexes in lumbar spine diseases. This review outlines the history of DTR of the lower limbs and describes the techniques, evaluation, and interpretation of DTR for the diagnosis of lumbar spine diseases. The patellar tendon reflex (PTR) was the first parameter of lower extremity DTR identified to have clinical usefulness, followed by the Achilles tendon reflex (ATR), pathological reflexes (Babinski reflex), and reflex enhancement (Jendrassik maneuver). They have now become an integral part of clinical examination. To determine whether an increase or decrease in DTR is pathological, it is necessary to determine left-right differences, differences between the upper and lower extremities, and the overall balance of the limb. There are several critical limitations and pitfalls in interpreting DTRs for lumbar spine diseases. Attention should be paid to examiner and patient factors that make the DTR assessment less objective. When there is a discrepancy between clinical and imaging findings and the level of the lumbosacral nerve root disorder is difficult to diagnose, the presence of a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, nerve root malformation, or furcal nerve should be considered. In addition, assessing the DTR after the gait loading test and standing extension loading test, which induce lumbosacral neuropathy, will help provide a rationale for the diagnosis.
与腰椎疾病的感觉和肌肉评估相比,深腱反射(DTR)是一个更客观的指标。此外,与需要患者配合的感觉和肌肉评估不同,即使是意识或认知受损的患者也可以进行DTR评估。因此,用叩诊锤进行DTR评估是腰椎疾病必不可少的神经学检查。然而,尽管DTR评估有用,但很少有报告描述下肢深反射增强、减弱或消失在腰椎疾病中的意义。本综述概述了下肢DTR的历史,并描述了用于诊断腰椎疾病的DTR技术、评估和解读。髌腱反射(PTR)是第一个被确定具有临床实用性的下肢DTR参数,其次是跟腱反射(ATR)、病理反射(巴宾斯基反射)和反射增强(金德拉斯基手法)。它们现在已成为临床检查的一个组成部分。为了确定DTR的增加或减少是否为病理性,有必要确定左右差异、上下肢之间的差异以及肢体的整体平衡。在解读腰椎疾病的DTR时存在几个关键的局限性和陷阱。应注意使DTR评估缺乏客观性的检查者和患者因素。当临床和影像学检查结果存在差异且腰骶神经根疾病的水平难以诊断时,应考虑腰骶部移行椎、神经根畸形或分叉神经的存在。此外,在步态负荷试验和站立伸展负荷试验后评估DTR,这两种试验可诱发腰骶部神经病变,将有助于为诊断提供依据。