Suppr超能文献

一项评估重症监护后多学科会诊对死亡率和 1 年生活质量影响的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of post-intensive care multidisciplinary consultations on mortality and the quality of life at 1 year.

机构信息

Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Pole Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Clinical Research Unit APHP. Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UMR1018 Anti-Infective Evasion and Pharmacoepidemiology Team, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, INSERM, Versailles, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):665-677. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07359-x. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Critical illness is associated with long-term increased mortality and impaired quality of life (QoL). We assessed whether multidisciplinary consultations would improve outcome at 12 months (M12) after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge.

METHODS

We performed an open, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible are patients discharged alive from ICU in 11 French hospitals between 2012 and 2018. The intervention group had a multidisciplinary face-to-face consultation involving an intensivist, a psychologist, and a social worker at ICU discharge and then at M3 and M6 (optional). The control group had standard post-ICU follow-up. A consultation was scheduled at M12 for all patients. The QoL was assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (Euro-QoL-5D-5L) which includes five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression), each ranging from 1 to 5 (1: no, 2: slight, 3: moderate, 4: severe, and 5: extreme problems). The primary endpoint was poor clinical outcome defined as death or severe-to-extreme impairment of at least one EuroQoL-5D-5L dimension at M12. The information was collected by a blinded investigator by phone. Secondary outcomes were functional, psychological, and cognitive status at M12 consultation.

RESULTS

540 patients were included (standard, n = 272; multidisciplinary, n = 268). The risk for a poor outcome was significantly greater in the multidisciplinary group than in the standard group [adjusted odds ratio 1.49 (95% confidence interval, (1.04-2.13)]. Seventy-two (13.3%) patients died at M12 (standard, n = 32; multidisciplinary, n = 40). The functional, psychological, and cognitive scores at M12 did not statistically differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A hospital-based, face-to-face, intensivist-led multidisciplinary consultation at ICU discharge then at 3 and 6 months was associated with poor outcome 1 year after ICU.

摘要

目的

危重病与长期死亡率增加和生活质量(QoL)受损有关。我们评估了多学科咨询是否会改善重症监护病房(ICU)出院后 12 个月(M12)的结局。

方法

我们进行了一项开放、多中心、平行组、随机临床试验。符合条件的患者为 2012 年至 2018 年期间在法国 11 家医院从 ICU 存活出院的患者。干预组在 ICU 出院时以及在 M3 和 M6 时(可选)进行了一次由重症监护医生、心理学家和社会工作者参与的面对面多学科咨询。对照组接受标准 ICU 随访。所有患者均在 M12 进行咨询。使用 EuroQol-5 维度-5 级(Euro-QoL-5D-5L)评估生活质量,该量表包括五个维度(行动能力、自理能力、日常活动、疼痛和焦虑/抑郁),每个维度的范围从 1 到 5(1:没有,2:轻微,3:中度,4:严重,5:极度困难)。主要终点是 M12 时的不良临床结局定义为死亡或至少一个 EuroQoL-5D-5L 维度的严重到极度受损。信息由一名经过盲法培训的调查员通过电话收集。次要结局是 M12 咨询时的功能、心理和认知状况。

结果

共纳入 540 例患者(标准组,n=272;多学科组,n=268)。多学科组的不良结局风险显著高于标准组[调整后的优势比 1.49(95%置信区间,1.04-2.13)]。72(13.3%)例患者在 M12 时死亡(标准组,n=32;多学科组,n=40)。两组患者 M12 时的功能、心理和认知评分无统计学差异。

结论

在 ICU 出院时以及在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行一次基于医院的、面对面的、由重症监护医生主导的多学科咨询与 ICU 后 1 年的不良结局相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验