Jang Seong Jun, Rosenstadt Jake, Lee Eugenia, Kunze Kyle N
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70Th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Jun;17(6):185-206. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09893-z. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) play a critical role in evaluating the success of treatment interventions for musculoskeletal conditions. However, predicting which patients will benefit from treatment interventions is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) may better anticipate the propensity to achieve clinically meaningful outcomes through leveraging complex predictive analytics that allow for personalized medicine. This article provides a contemporary review of current applications of AI developed to predict clinically significant outcome (CSO) achievement after musculoskeletal treatment interventions.
The highest volume of literature exists in the subspecialties of total joint arthroplasty, spine, and sports medicine, with only three studies identified in the remaining orthopedic subspecialties combined. Performance is widely variable across models, with most studies only reporting discrimination as a performance metric. Given the complexity inherent in predictive modeling for this task, including data availability, data handling, model architecture, and outcome selection, studies vary widely in their methodology and results. Importantly, the majority of studies have not been externally validated or demonstrate important methodological limitations, precluding their implementation into clinical settings. A substantial body of literature has accumulated demonstrating variable internal validity, limited scope, and low potential for clinical deployment. The majority of studies attempt to predict the MCID-the lowest bar of clinical achievement. Though a small proportion of models demonstrate promise and highlight the utility of AI, important methodological limitations need to be addressed moving forward to leverage AI-based applications for clinical deployment.
患者报告结局测量(PROM)在评估肌肉骨骼疾病治疗干预的成功与否方面起着关键作用。然而,预测哪些患者将从治疗干预中获益是复杂的,且受多种因素影响。人工智能(AI)或许可以通过利用复杂的预测分析来更好地预测实现具有临床意义结局的倾向,从而实现个性化医疗。本文对目前开发的用于预测肌肉骨骼治疗干预后临床显著结局(CSO)达成情况的AI应用进行当代综述。
文献数量最多的领域是全关节置换术、脊柱和运动医学亚专业,其余骨科亚专业合并起来仅有三项研究。各模型的表现差异很大,大多数研究仅将区分度作为一种表现指标进行报告。鉴于此任务预测建模中固有的复杂性,包括数据可用性、数据处理、模型架构和结局选择,各研究在方法和结果上差异很大。重要的是,大多数研究尚未经过外部验证,或存在重要的方法学局限性,这使得它们无法应用于临床环境。大量文献积累显示出内部效度各异、范围有限且临床应用潜力低。大多数研究试图预测最小临床重要差异(MCID)——临床成就的最低标准。虽然一小部分模型显示出前景并突出了AI的效用,但为了将基于AI的应用用于临床部署,需要解决重要的方法学局限性。