Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Poitiers, University Hospital Center of Poitiers, Poitiers, 86000, France.
Pprime Institute UPR 3346-CNRS, University of Poitiers, Axe RoBioSS, Poitiers, 86073, France.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06457-4.
The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a simulated forceps birth, and then to study the association of the obstetricians' experience with the technique adopted.
Fifty-seven volunteer obstetricians, 20 from the Limoges and 37 from the Poitiers University hospitals, were included in this multi-centric study. They were classified into 3 groups: beginners, intermediates, and experts, beginners having performed fewer than 10 forceps deliveries in real conditions, intermediates between 10 and 100, and experts more than 100. The posture and movements of the obstetricians were recorded between December 2020 and March 2021 using an optoelectronic motion capture system during simulated forceps births. Joint angles qualifying these postures and movements were analysed between the three phases of the foetal traction. These phases were defined by the passage of a virtual point associated with the forceps blade through two anatomical planes: the mid-pelvis and the pelvic outlet. Then, a consolidated ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) was applied to these data in order to objectify the existence of groups of similar behaviours.
The AHC distinguished four different postures adopted when crossing the first plane and three different traction techniques. 48% of the beginners adopted one of the two raised posture, 22% being raised without trunk flexion and 26% raised with trunk flexion. Conversely, 58% of the experts positioned themselves in a "chevalier servant" posture (going down on one knee) and 25% in a "squatting" posture before initiating traction. The results also show that the joint movement amplitude tends to reduce with the level of expertise.
Forceps delivery was performed in different ways, with the experienced obstetricians favouring postures that enabled observation at the level of the maternal perineum and techniques reducing movement amplitude. The first perspective of this work is to relate these different techniques to the traction force generated. The results of these studies have the potential to contribute to the training of obstetricians in forceps delivery, and to improve the safety of women and newborns.
本研究旨在通过三维运动学分析,确定并定性模拟产钳分娩过程中产科医生的姿势和动作,然后研究产科医生经验与所采用技术之间的关联。
本多中心研究纳入了来自利摩日和普瓦捷大学医院的 57 名志愿产科医生,其中 20 名来自利摩日,37 名来自普瓦捷。他们被分为 3 组:初学者、中级和专家,初学者在实际情况下进行的产钳分娩少于 10 次,中级为 10 至 100 次,专家则超过 100 次。在模拟产钳分娩过程中,使用光电运动捕捉系统记录 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 3 月期间产科医生的姿势和动作。在胎儿牵引的三个阶段分析了确定这些姿势和动作的关节角度。这些阶段是通过与产钳叶片相关联的虚拟点穿过两个解剖平面来定义的:中骨盆和骨盆出口。然后,对这些数据应用整合的升序层次分类(AHC),以客观地确定存在具有相似行为的组。
AHC 区分了穿过第一个平面时采用的四种不同姿势和三种不同的牵引技术。48%的初学者采用了两种抬高姿势中的一种,22%是在不弯曲躯干的情况下抬高,26%是在弯曲躯干的情况下抬高。相反,58%的专家采用“侍从骑士”姿势(单膝跪地),25%采用“蹲”姿势,然后开始牵引。结果还表明,关节运动幅度随着专业水平的提高而减小。
产钳分娩的方式不同,经验丰富的产科医生倾向于采用能够观察到产妇会阴部的姿势和减少运动幅度的技术。这项工作的第一个视角是将这些不同的技术与产生的牵引力联系起来。这些研究的结果有可能有助于产科医生在产钳分娩方面的培训,并提高妇女和新生儿的安全性。