Keilig Ludger, Brieskorn Lena, Schwarze Jörg, Schupp Werner, Bourauel Christoph, Konermann Anna
Oral Technology, University Hospital Bonn, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1267. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051267.
Aligners are an effective and esthetic orthodontic treatment option for permanent and mixed dentition. There are only a few studies dealing with the effectiveness of orovestibular tooth movement using aligners and applying adequate examination methods. In the present retrospective study, the aligner efficiency of orovestibular movements for the entire dentition was systematically evaluated using 3D superimposition, taking into account the influence of jaw, tooth type and Invisalign system.
Group 1 ( = 18 adults, Invisalign) and Group 2 ( = 17 adolescents, Invisalign Teen) were treated with Invisalign Ex30 aligner material and Invisalign specific auxiliary means. In this non-interventional retrospective study, pre- and post-treatment maxillary and mandibular plaster cast models were scanned and superimposed with ClinChecks via Surface-Surface Matching Algorithm on unmoved teeth providing stable references. Effectivity of planned versus clinically realized movements was evaluated for each tooth. Statistics were performed with a -test and Bonferroni-Holm correction ( = 0.05).
Orovestibular movement efficiency was excellent without statistical significance regarding jaw, tooth type or Invisalign system. Mandibular translational tooth movements were highly effective, and outstanding for premolars (91-98%). Maxillary translational tooth movements were successful for incisors and premolars, but less effective for canines and molars. Almost all teeth were moderately or very effectively corrected by crown tipping, performing better for mandibular (70-92%) than maxillary (22-31%) canines as much as for adolescent upper front teeth (81-85%) and lower canines (92%).
Aligners are able to effectively implement translational orovestibular movements, supported by tilting the crowns for even more efficient implementation of the movements. This phenomenon was observed in our studies for all teeth in both jaws, regardless of the Invisalign system used. Treatment planning should nevertheless take into account the individual patient parameters with regard to the movements to be performed in order to make the aligner therapy as successful as possible in terms of realizing the desired therapeutic goal.
矫治器是恒牙列和混合牙列正畸治疗的一种有效且美观的选择。仅有少数研究使用矫治器并采用适当的检查方法来探讨口前庭牙齿移动的有效性。在本回顾性研究中,使用三维叠加技术,系统评估了整个牙列口前庭移动的矫治器效率,并考虑了颌骨、牙齿类型和隐适美系统的影响。
第1组(18名成年人,使用隐适美)和第2组(17名青少年,使用隐适美青少年版)采用隐适美Ex30矫治器材料和隐适美特定辅助手段进行治疗。在这项非干预性回顾性研究中,对治疗前和治疗后的上颌和下颌石膏模型进行扫描,并通过表面 - 表面匹配算法将其与ClinChecks在未移动的牙齿上进行叠加,以提供稳定的参考。评估每颗牙齿计划移动与临床实际移动的有效性。采用t检验和Bonferroni-Holm校正进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。
口前庭移动效率极佳,在颌骨、牙齿类型或隐适美系统方面无统计学差异。下颌平移牙齿移动非常有效,前磨牙的移动效果尤为突出(91 - 98%)。上颌平移牙齿移动对切牙和前磨牙成功,但对尖牙和磨牙效果较差。几乎所有牙齿通过牙冠倾斜得到中度或非常有效的矫正,下颌尖牙(70 - 92%)比上颌尖牙(22 - 31%)以及青少年上前牙(81 - 85%)和下尖牙(92%)的矫正效果更好。
矫治器能够有效地实现口前庭平移移动,并通过牙冠倾斜来支持,从而更有效地实现移动。在我们的研究中,无论使用何种隐适美系统,在上下颌的所有牙齿中均观察到了这种现象。然而,治疗计划仍应考虑个体患者在要进行的移动方面的参数,以便在实现期望的治疗目标方面使矫治器治疗尽可能成功。