Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett St Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 9;32(5):278. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08484-5.
Decades following the introduction of vincristine as treatment for haematological malignancies, vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) remains a pervasive, untreatable side-effect. However there remains a gap in understanding the characteristics of VIPN in adults. This study presents a comprehensive phenotyping of VIPN.
Adult patients (n = 57; age = 59.8 ± 14.6) were assessed cross-sectionally following completion of vincristine (months post treatment = 16.3 ± 15.6, cumulative dose = 7.6 ± 4.4), with a subset of 20 patients assessed prospectively during treatment. Patient reported measures (EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20, R-ODS) were used to profile symptoms and disability. Neurological assessment was undertaken using the Total Neuropathy Score and nerve conduction studies. Sensory threshold and fine motor tasks were also undertaken. Comparisons of data between timepoints were calculated using paired-sample t tests or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Comparisons between outcome measures were calculated with independent sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric data.
The majority of patients developed VIPN by mid-treatment (77.8%, 7.0 ± 3.3 weeks post baseline) with the prevalence remaining stable by end-of-treatment (75%, 8.1 ± 1.7 weeks post mid-treatment). By 3 months post-completion, 50% of patients still reported VIPN although there were significant improvements on neurological grading and functional assessment (P < 0.05). VIPN presented with sensorimotor involvement in upper and lower limbs and was associated with decreased sensory and motor nerve amplitudes, reduced fine-motor function and increased disability.
VIPN in adults presents as a sensorimotor, upper- and lower-limb neuropathy that significantly impacts disability and function. Neuropathy recovery occurs in a proportion of patients; however, VIPN symptoms may persist and continue to affect long-term quality of life.
自长春新碱用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤以来的几十年中,长春新碱诱导的周围神经病变(VIPN)仍然是一种普遍存在且无法治疗的副作用。然而,成年人中 VIPN 的特征仍存在理解上的差距。本研究对 VIPN 进行了全面表型分析。
在完成长春新碱治疗后(治疗后月份= 16.3±15.6,累积剂量= 7.6±4.4),对 57 例成年患者进行了横断面评估,其中 20 例患者在治疗期间进行了前瞻性评估。使用 EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20 和 R-ODS 患者报告量表来评估症状和残疾情况。使用总神经病变评分和神经传导研究进行神经学评估。还进行了感觉阈值和精细运动任务。使用配对样本 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 匹配对符号秩检验比较各时间点之间的数据。使用独立样本 t 检验或非参数数据的 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较各结局测量值。
大多数患者在治疗中期(77.8%,基线后 7.0±3.3 周)就出现了 VIPN,在治疗结束时(75%,治疗中期后 8.1±1.7 周)其患病率仍然稳定。在完成治疗后 3 个月,仍有 50%的患者报告 VIPN,尽管在神经学分级和功能评估方面有显著改善(P<0.05)。VIPN 表现为上肢和下肢的感觉运动受累,并伴有感觉和运动神经幅度降低、精细运动功能下降和残疾增加。
成人 VIPN 表现为一种感觉运动性、上肢和下肢神经病,严重影响残疾和功能。一部分患者的神经病变会恢复;然而,VIPN 症状可能持续存在,并继续影响长期生活质量。