Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.
Department of Midwifery and Maternal-Infant Health Care, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Reprod Sci. 2024 Aug;31(8):2379-2391. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01525-8. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
Compared to Western populations, Chinese and Asians possess distinct genetics, lifestyles, and dietary habits. They tend to have shorter stature, lower Body Mass Index (BMI), and higher body fat percentages than Western populations. The aim of this study was to compare disparities in maternal-fetal outcomes by combining pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain (GWG) based on distinct US and Chinese guidelines. A total of 2,271 pregnant women who received perinatal care at Fooyin University Hospital from 2016 to 2021 were included. Logistic regression analysis categorized women into twelve groups based on the two criteria to explore the relationships between BMI and GWG, and maternal-fetal outcomes. Among the subjects, only 23.2% and 21.8% women had a normal weight BMI and adequate GWG, based on US and Chinese criteria, respectively. As BMI and GWG increase, the likelihood of developing complications such as gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, Cesarean section, and Large for Gestational Age also rises. Conversely, underweight women with excessive GWG exhibited lower risk of preterm birth either by US or Chinese guidelines. Two criteria exhibited similar odds for investigated outcomes, except for gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. Women had more than double the odds of developing gestational hypertension or preeclampsia when using US criteria compared to Chinese criteria. Therefore, it is essential for Asian, especially Chinese women, to be aware of the differences in adverse outcomes such as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia when using US criteria.
与西方人群相比,中国人和亚洲人具有独特的遗传、生活方式和饮食习惯。他们的身材通常更矮小,身体质量指数(BMI)更低,体脂百分比更高。本研究旨在比较基于不同的美国和中国指南的孕前 BMI 和孕期体重增加(GWG)来合并母胎结局的差异。共纳入了 2016 年至 2021 年在辅英科技大学医院接受围产期护理的 2271 名孕妇。使用逻辑回归分析将女性分为 12 组,基于这两个标准来探讨 BMI 和 GWG 与母胎结局之间的关系。在这些研究对象中,仅有 23.2%和 21.8%的女性符合美国和中国标准的正常体重 BMI 和足够的 GWG。随着 BMI 和 GWG 的增加,患妊娠糖尿病、妊娠高血压或子痫前期、剖宫产和巨大儿等并发症的可能性也会增加。相反,根据美国或中国标准,体重过轻但 GWG 过多的女性早产风险较低。这两个标准在调查结果方面表现出相似的几率,除了妊娠高血压或子痫前期。与中国标准相比,使用美国标准的女性患妊娠高血压或子痫前期的几率是中国标准的两倍多。因此,亚洲女性,特别是中国女性,在使用美国标准时,必须意识到妊娠高血压或子痫前期等不良结局的差异。