Suppr超能文献

患者对医生的投诉和医疗法律索赔的特征,以及针对这些投诉和索赔的补救干预措施:文献快速综述。

Patient characteristics of, and remedial interventions for, complaints and medico-legal claims against doctors: a rapid review of the literature.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 9;13(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02501-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain if patient's characteristics are associated with complaints and claims against doctors. Additionally, evidence for the effectiveness of remedial interventions on rates of complaints and claims against doctors has not been synthesised.

METHODS

We conducted a rapid review of recent literature to answer: Question 1 "What are the common characteristics and circumstances of patients who are most likely to complain or bring a claim about the care they have received from a doctor?" and Question 2 "What initiatives or interventions have been shown to be effective at reducing complaints and claims about the care patients have received from a doctor?". We used a systematic search (most recently in July 2023) of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature. Studies were screened against inclusion criteria and critically appraised in duplicate using standard tools. Results were summarised using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

From 8079 search results, we reviewed the full text of 250 studies. We included 25 studies: seven for Question 1 (6 comparative studies with controls and one systematic review) and 18 studies for Question 2 (14 uncontrolled pre-post studies, 2 comparative studies with controls and 2 systematic reviews). Most studies were set in hospitals across a mix of medical specialties. Other than for patients with mental health conditions (two studies), no other patient characteristics demonstrated either a strong or consistent effect on the rate of complaints or claims against their treating doctors. Risk management programs (6 studies), and communication and resolution programs (5 studies) were the most studied of 6 intervention types. Evidence for reducing complaints and medico-legal claims, costs or premiums and more timely management was apparent for both types of programs. Only 1 to 3 studies were included for peer programs, medical remediation, shared decision-making, simulation training and continuing professional development, with few generalisable results.

CONCLUSION

Few patient characteristics can be reliably related to the likelihood of medico-legal complaints or claims. There is some evidence that interventions can reduce the number and costs of claims, the number of complaints, and the timeliness of claims. However, across both questions, the strength of the evidence is very weak and is based on only a few studies or study designs that are highly prone to bias.

摘要

背景

目前尚不确定患者特征是否与针对医生的投诉和索赔有关。此外,也没有综合评估补救干预措施对减少针对医生的投诉和索赔的效果。

方法

我们对近期文献进行快速综述,以回答以下两个问题:问题 1“最有可能对接受医生治疗的过程提出投诉或索赔的患者有哪些常见特征和情况?”问题 2“哪些举措或干预措施已被证明能有效减少针对患者接受医生治疗的投诉和索赔?”我们使用系统检索(最近一次检索时间为 2023 年 7 月),对 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和灰色文献进行了检索。研究经过纳入标准筛选,并使用标准工具进行了双人重复评估。结果采用叙述性综合法进行总结。

结果

从 8079 条检索结果中,我们对 250 篇研究的全文进行了审查。共纳入 25 项研究:7 项研究针对问题 1(6 项有对照的比较研究和 1 项系统综述),18 项研究针对问题 2(14 项无对照的前后研究、2 项有对照的比较研究和 2 项系统综述)。大多数研究在医院进行,涉及多种医疗专业。除了精神健康状况的患者(两项研究),没有其他患者特征显示与针对其治疗医生的投诉或索赔率有强相关或一致的关系。风险管理方案(6 项研究)和沟通与解决方案(5 项研究)是 6 种干预类型中研究最多的方案。这两种方案在减少投诉和法律索赔、成本或保费以及更及时的管理方面的证据是明显的。只有 1 到 3 项研究涉及同行方案、医疗矫正、共同决策、模拟训练和持续专业发展,结果难以推广。

结论

只有少数患者特征可以可靠地与法律投诉或索赔的可能性相关。有一些证据表明,干预措施可以减少索赔数量和成本、投诉数量以及索赔的及时性。然而,在这两个问题中,证据的强度非常弱,且仅基于少数研究或高度易受偏倚影响的研究设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/089d/11003134/0d5373ae84db/13643_2024_2501_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验