Shaik Izaz, Kusuma Manisha, Elsayed Mennattallah, Veluru Keerthini, Nabeel Aeliya, Sindhura Ravi
Lakewood Family Dental, Bloomington, Illinois, USA.
BDS, RDH, Florida, USA.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S90-S92. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_556_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
This systematic review was conducted with the purpose of analyzing the effects of root-end sealers in endodontic re-treatment cases and comparing calcium-based sealers with sealers, which were resin-based.
We conducted this review based on the principles of Cochrane systematic type of studies and also based on guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). An exhaustive search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases for the studies, which were based on root end sealers in cases of endodontic re-treatments. The data were then analyzed statistically with the help of SPSS 25.0.
It was seen that when comparing pain levels in post-obturation cases with these sealers after 24 hours and 48 hours, not much of statistically noteworthy differences were evident. Mean difference (MD) values at 24 hours were -0.20 with confidence intervals between -0.44 and 0.07 and value of 0.15, whereas in case of 48 hours, MD was -0.36, CI- 0.65, and value was 0.03. However, the results were slightly better with calcium-based sealers.
Calcium silicate-based root end obturation sealers had similar performance when compared to resin-based sealers when we compared variables like pain intensity, etc.
进行本系统评价以分析根管充填封闭剂在根管再治疗病例中的效果,并比较钙基封闭剂和树脂基封闭剂。
我们基于Cochrane系统评价类型的研究原则以及系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行本评价。在PubMed、Medline和Embase数据库中对基于根管再治疗病例中根管末端封闭剂的研究进行了详尽检索。然后借助SPSS 25.0对数据进行统计分析。
可以看出,在比较使用这些封闭剂进行根管充填后24小时和48小时的疼痛水平时,没有明显的统计学显著差异。24小时时的平均差值(MD)为-0.20,置信区间为-0.44至0.07,P值为0.15;而在48小时时,MD为-0.36,CI为-0.65,P值为0.03。然而,钙基封闭剂的结果略好。
当我们比较疼痛强度等变量时,硅酸钙基根管末端充填封闭剂与树脂基封闭剂具有相似的性能。